Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
S.F.W. (1994)
8/10
Was a sad sign of things to come.
30 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
It's sorry to see this movie get panned by critics, but I can also see why critics hated it, because critics are a part of the media that "S.F.W." tried to make fun of. For every person claiming this to be the worst movie ever, you took it too seriously. The whole point of the film was not to take it too seriously, and focus on what animals people can become when someone they know becomes famous. All his friends and family didn't care what he and the others went through, they wanted whatever dime they could make off of him, and it portrays it very subtly. Joe's (his friend that died) older sister sleeps with him, only to sell his "bedroom stories" to the tabloids, but it's only revealed in a split-second when Spab sees it posted on a tabloid cover on display.

His other friend (Jake Busey) takes Spab to a place, where he beats up some kid, then goes to another place, pulls a gun on a girl he slept with, and then takes him to his sister's house (who happens to be a lawyer), all in the name of hiding him from the press. Shortly after she sleeps with him and has him throw Busey's gun in the lake, she starts talking about suing people and splitting the money with her and her brother. He gets disenchanted and runs off, only to hear a radio APB placed on him for beating up the kid that Busey's character roughed up, long story short, they set him up so that if he didn't play ball, they'd frame him for a crime.

Long story short, if you were a teenager in the 90's and you watched this then, watch it again and you'd be surprised how it probably went in your memory from being a stoner-drama flick to a decently made indie film that was simply a sign of things to come about the never-ending pseudo-celebrity.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silent Hill (2006)
9/10
If you're a fan, awesome, if not....still good
23 April 2006
By leaps and bounds the best video-game adaptation ever. First off, it wasn't done by Uwe Boll, secondly, anyone who says this movie sucked obviously expected way too much. It's a video-game adaptation, so don't nitpick and expect it to be an Oscar winner. It's a good, scary, (and pretty gory) horror film. I will admit, it's one of those movies where if you REALLY don't pay attention to every minute, you WILL get lost. And just so all of you know, if you're not at least halfway intelligent, don't even try to figure this movie out, it's too advanced for you then, because the story does take some thought to figure out by the ending. I'm sick of hearing a bunch of kids come on here and saying "it sucked because it didn't follow the game %110", or sitting there nitpicking it down to a T...give me a break, it was a great movie, and if you're gonna give it a bad rating just because you can't look past the fact that it's based on a video game, then you don't deserve to watch this VERY well-made film, given it's origins.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
BloodRayne (2005)
1/10
Man, I hate ignorant moviegoers, Bloodrayne sucks
18 December 2005
I'm already frustrated because the rating system only only goes down to 1 instead of -10....Because Uwe Boll has done it again! He has managed to make a completely god-awful movie, and has caused to me lose respect for the "actors" in this filth. Granted the only one that had my respect was Kingsley...well, not anymore. The non-existent "story" was worthless. There are actually ignorant people that LIKE this crap, and it's sad, because anyone who rates this more than a 1 is probably some 15-year-old kid who got off on that "love scene" that looked like it was straight out of a Ron Jeremy flick. Kristanna Loken's got the personality of used toilet paper, and Michael madsen...well....he just kinda looked like he was drunk..wouldn't put it past him anyway. The only reason why Uwe Boll is still allowed to make movies is because ignorant movie goers and the few fans he has defend him to the death, he is horrible and he should be barred from ever touching a camera again.
229 out of 408 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed