Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Still better than most Hollywood garbage
8 February 2005
I saw this movie a view times. I would agree that this is not the best of his movies. However, it is still superior to most Hollywood garbage. The kind of honest writing that this movie has that seems down to earth and not full of cheap tactics to grab the audience's attention is an example of why I still love Woody Allen movies. I have very few complaints about his work although my favorite films are definitely over 10 to 15 years old. I would still recommend it to Woody Allen fans.

The film making is thought provoking. the film's characters' life is hectic, disorganized and falling apart at the seams, Meanwhile his creative works are organized and stable. If you watch closely you will notice that the camera work is jumpy, chaotic and unstable during the scenes that depict his personal life. The camera work in The scenes that are depicting the stories written by the main character are steady, organized and calm. I thought it was still pretty rare to find something this thoughtful in a movie.

I think that Allen may be getting progressively self-indulgent. I think it is a little painful to see him pairing himself with gorgeous blonds and other young model types ("curse of the Jade Scorpion" and "Hollywood ending" are great examples). For the simple reason that one of his best qualities in his comedy was his self-deprecating style that seemed to differentiate himself from the run of the mill "movie star films". This being said, this movie is not a good example of his increasing self-indulgence.

It actually shows Woody loose the girl to a younger (Crystal who really isn't that young) more hip man-of-the-world. In this film, you see the character having to face reality, which pains him because he can only functionally exist in a world of fantasy. This is interesting content.

Part of the problem is there are such great expectations with such an all star cast (Williams and Crystal for example). I would say this is far from his ground-breaking work. The jokes aren't that hilarious and the acting is just "OK" ,with the exception of the more relaxed/sincere scenes with Bob Balaban. It is still 10 times more intelligent than the average movie. Movies that has to use buckets of blood and flashes of naked bodies just to keep you awake.

I would not recommend this movie for anyone with a short attention span. In fact I wouldn't recommend this film unless you have seen Woody's earlier films first (like Bananas, Annie Hall etc). However, I am a fan of Woody's writing and film making and I still enjoyed it quite a bit.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bowfinger (1999)
I liked it - (the second time around)
13 November 2004
I watched this film for the second time tonight. As a result, the second viewing left me with a different impression than my first viewing. It did seem funnier the second time around. Mostly because my high expectations for it were already flushed down the toilet the first time I viewed it. This is not always a bad thing.

When you watch a movie for the first time you often have unrealistic or misguided expectations about what it should be. Part of the problem with this movie is that people watch it and hope that both Steve Martin and Eddie Murphy will be the same cutting-edge type groundbreaking comedians that they were in their prime. So, when you see this film you are inevitably disappointed.

My biggest complaint about this film would be that it could have been a bit more Zany. By this I mean that at their (Martin and Murphy's) age and level of success it seems they don't want to take chances. As a result they produce a kind of Bland tasting quaker-oats-esque style of comedy. It kind of leaves you with a bad taste in your mouth.

The truth is that they are both still very good. They are just not the same comedians that they once were. So, this movie is actually not all that bad, if you watch it without expecting too much. this is also why people usually say it could have been better.

After seeing this film for the second time I would say that I liked it. It showed Steve Martin's creative writing ability (ie. the dog in designer pumps). It was also nice to see Murphy playing a role where is not the smartest/wittiest/most talented person in the room for a change.

So, I guess some movies are just better the second time around. I could think of dozens of movies on the top of my head that did well at the box office yet were intellectually inferior to this film. Definitely worth a $0.99 rent at your local gas station.

Jack P.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed