Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Twist (2003)
The best small, gay independent film I've seen in awhile.
15 December 2004
For a small independent film I thought it was good. I kept comparing it--in my mind--to "Love and human remains" and "Eclipse" probably because it too was distributed by Strand and that Strand intro always catches me. I'll agree with others that it was overlong, or would have benefited from tighter editing; some scenes should have been tightened up. But the overlong scenes are probably there because those making the film were really eager to get a point across or create an atmosphere.

Each reviewer seemed to get a different message, as is true of just about all the films reviewd at this site. I was impressed with the way the hustlers absorbed and accepted the opinions others have of them; I've sort-of gotten that same opinion watching boys at work at a local mall and transit depot. Society thinks of them as lepers or diseased or garbage and they begin to think of themselves that way. I often get the impression that they've come to think of themselves as so dirty that even if help were offered they would just say that it's "too late for me." I have heard one-or-two say that, by the way. Someday I'd like to meet one who didn't accept the role society assigned him and actually developed a positive self-image. That's the important gift my mother gave me.. "you're as good as anybody."

Being an romantic old fag I was, of course, much taken by the character of Oliver before he became angry and bitter. Thank God I've become too old to think that I can save anyone who's become hard, angry and bitter; that's for the experts.

The character of Fagan was interesting just because he was played as a person who seemed to have moments of caring that came across to me as sincere; I hadn't expected that. I know I've seen that actor somewhere else, but I can't remember where.

I really thought that the final scene with Oliver in the motel got the film's message across forcefully. It's a shame that the film maker didn't stop there; the empty bed scene over stated the obvious.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I second G.P. (Orange County)'s comments.
27 November 2004
At some point I want to go through more reviews and see if I can gain a greater understanding of this film. The AIDs thing was predictable; hard to find a recently released "gay" movie without that element. For a while I thought that it had become possible to make "gay" movie without a AIDs subplot. The adult Farrell character reminded me of an old stereotype of AmIndian, black and female characters; somehow he really had no life other than making the lives of those around him better. The picture of him alone--after the last has died--on that desolate farm somehow fits the stereotype. I guess my big question is, why in a relationship that is depicted as so fluid and "hippy-like" do the two main characters (not Farrell's) leave when they find that the other loves or is-having-sex with "Bobby?" I lived among many hippies in S.F. way back when and most wouldn't have given up a roof over their heads because of an element in a relationship that should have been obvious to all for a long time. I find the female characters exit particularly confusing. Once through this film was more than enough.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed