Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Heartbreaking and Brilliant
23 June 2007
To criticise the participants in this film, to "want to jump into the TV and start punching people" is as misguided and pointless as railing at the "racism" in the films of the Marx Brothers or Buster Keaton. These were different times (for instance the word "retarded" is no longer acceptable) and the people here were working to standards deemed normal at the time. The Sergeant depicted here, George Ray, in particular comes across as humane, yet you cringe when he towers over a seven year old boy who whimpers as he interrogates him about a stolen cowboy suit. The officers spend a lot of time visiting schools and homes in order to keep these kids OUT of court. They shout at them, humiliate them and make them cry - all seeming like abuse by today's standards - but the fact remains that the matters ended there and not in a juvenile court. Nowadays, with the bean-counting culture endemic in today's legal system, these would all be seen as easy detections and criminal records would ensue.

The lack of training in these officers is apparent when you hear "Police Woman Mrs Brooks" badgering children over and over again with unanswerable questions like "Why are you not at school? Why are you not at school?" and "Why are you stealing?" A nervous smile or shrug is met with a shout of "IT'S NOT FUNNY!" When one girl, unable by her own admission to think of anything to say to these closed questions apart from "I felt like it" flees in tears to her bedroom, the female officer follows and attempts to calm her but continues to badger her, demanding "Are you listening?" over and over again.

However, the lack of training was not the officers' fault. They were working within the parameters of the then current system. They were probably regarded as the "wet" wing of the force by their colleagues who were accustomed simply to arresting offenders.

It's heartbreaking to see George, in his filthy underwear, wailing as he is pulled out of bed and then, incongruously, putting his tie on before leaving the house in a sulk! No baseball caps or hoodies in evidence here...

Similarly, the beautiful young Asian girl, Rashida (who unfortunately continued to offend before entering into an arranged marriage) is obviously devious yet charming, and stands before Sergeant Ray as he counts out felt tip markers and grills her about a stolen apple! Watched in conjunction with the sequel from 15 years later, Juvenile Liason 2, this becomes even more heart-rending. One of the two boys caught truanting, and not much else, in Woolworths is now a career criminal and describes himself as "a loser" with no hope. Another boy featured is a petty criminal, drinking from a can and grinning as he recounts his life of crime.

Broomfield has produced a work of genius here. Sergeant Ray complains about the editing - that the good works they did were not included - but sadly unfair editing usually makes for better viewing. This is a brilliant snapshot of how we used to treat our children, and is worth watching any time you feel like going back to the old ways.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Should have been put down.
22 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
It's no good saying "Don't compare it to Wanda" - the makers rode on Wanda's coat-tails for publicity and there's an in-joke about it at the end between Cleese and Curtis. Also, some scenes are virtual remakes of others from Wanda (Cleese caught in state of undress! My aching sides.)

Even without its brilliant predecessor, this movie stinks on ice. If you find silly animal costumes, "flustered man sex jokes" ("Titsbits! I mean tidbits!" - repeat ad nauseam), repeated shots of JLC's cleavage (not on as good form as in Wanda, it has to be said) and fart gags entertaining then hallelujah! You've found your ultimate movie. For my part, I find all of the above tedious, hence my antipathy towards this movie. Cleese does his Fawlty schtick AGAIN ("SORRY!!" "WHAT?!?" etc), Palin does the same routine he's been doing throughout Python, Life Of Brian, Wanda etc. Kline is almost always funny, but even he labours in this. He gets marks for his "suicidal" line towards the end, but he seems in a state of panic throughout.

The recurring theme of Cleese being caught in compromising positions and as a result being thought a sex-maniac was old when the Carry On team did it to death in the Seventies. Similarly in Barbara Windsor territory were Curtis' lines in front of the Lemur cage - "Aren't they beautiful? Don't you just want to fondle them?" - while Cleese gurns like Sid James eating a nettle. We're entitled to expect better from these people.

Avoid.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
dinnerladies (1998–2000)
A Strange Brew
4 July 2005
I never watched this when it was originally transmitted, but taped an evening of it on UK Gold on the recommendation of a friend. I've watched three episodes, and I don't know where they figure chronologically in the series (they're preparing to go to Marbella), but it seems to assume some knowledge of the characters.

I've never been a huge fan of Victoria Wood - that cosy twin-set'n'pearls/there's a sale on at Marks's type humour leaves me cold. And I can see what she's trying to do here - it's very densely written, with great attention to wordplay and rhythm - but it still doesn't completely work for me.

As with the Royle Family (which I detest) I find this slightly patronising. I don't like to see acting folk showing us how they think working class people act and speak - would EVERYBODY in the canteen really say "Mar-BELL-a"? I don't know a single person who does, and I spend my time with people of all classes.

Some of it raises a wry smile, but I don't know whether I'll sit through three hours of it. Duncan Preston is always good value, ditto Celia Imrie.

I would rate it as a curate's egg, gone off slightly.
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Buttons' Fate (Spoilers)
11 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
He may even have gone to "the chair", this being as you say Fifties' America! I thought the detective was going to let him off when he helped him save the Boss Man's life - when he took him away, I even thought he was going to come back and say it had all been a misunderstanding! Still, the circus folk had forgotten him within a couple of hours, laughing, joking and getting on with their love lives. And I wonder what the kid's parents said when she turned up with a dog, saying "the clown gave him to me"!

Good job they rounded up all those lions and tigers too.

I was amazed at the size of the crowds - these were simpler times, and people, not as jaded as today, were more easily amused.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed