Excellent, possibly, but not great in context of film of the period. Few might, but I would rank Shoot the Piano Player over Jules et Jim (while virtually no one would argue The 400 Blows).
That's just Truffaut. Then consider Godard's Breathless, or even Contempt. That's before mentioning Fellini: 8 1/2, La Strada, La Dolce Vita.
For film buffs today, the Italian Neo-Realists (and post) and the French New Wave represent the most prolific period of innovation in film, driven by creatives who rejected most of what they saw in contemporary "manufactured", dumbed-down films. American film was at its nadir as the studio system was plummeting on miscalculated automatic pilot.
Jules et Jim feels like a pulling back, a reaction on Truffaut's part to the failure of Shoot the Piano Player to match The 400 Blows with critics or audiences. This, his third film, contains some of the spirit of his earlier work, of Godard and Fellini, but fails to lift beyond, to be an evolution, much less another salvo in the revolution.
Yes, it was controversial for its content. Jeanne Moreau matches the best of American actresses (as in an apt comparison to Bette Davis on the overall dreadful DVD commentary). Raoul Coutard's cinematography is the fourth lead actor of the film. There's very little to criticize, in fact.
This film is enjoyable for many reasons, and required for devotees or students of film as art.
But greatness? Even in its time and context, many more foreign and some American films surpassed it. Hitchcock and Welles, even Kubrick were already on stage.
While worthwhile, it doesn't rank with those films that changed film, or culture itself.
That's just Truffaut. Then consider Godard's Breathless, or even Contempt. That's before mentioning Fellini: 8 1/2, La Strada, La Dolce Vita.
For film buffs today, the Italian Neo-Realists (and post) and the French New Wave represent the most prolific period of innovation in film, driven by creatives who rejected most of what they saw in contemporary "manufactured", dumbed-down films. American film was at its nadir as the studio system was plummeting on miscalculated automatic pilot.
Jules et Jim feels like a pulling back, a reaction on Truffaut's part to the failure of Shoot the Piano Player to match The 400 Blows with critics or audiences. This, his third film, contains some of the spirit of his earlier work, of Godard and Fellini, but fails to lift beyond, to be an evolution, much less another salvo in the revolution.
Yes, it was controversial for its content. Jeanne Moreau matches the best of American actresses (as in an apt comparison to Bette Davis on the overall dreadful DVD commentary). Raoul Coutard's cinematography is the fourth lead actor of the film. There's very little to criticize, in fact.
This film is enjoyable for many reasons, and required for devotees or students of film as art.
But greatness? Even in its time and context, many more foreign and some American films surpassed it. Hitchcock and Welles, even Kubrick were already on stage.
While worthwhile, it doesn't rank with those films that changed film, or culture itself.
Tell Your Friends