You'll learn more about this case from it's Wikipedia page than you will from watching this.
There is a strange, disjointed timeline of events, interspersed with inappropriate scenes of KC walking through woods spouting nature metaphors and such.
Her scenes add absolutely nothing to the documentary; it felt like a sponsored advertisement every time she spoke. I fail to understand why she was on screen at all, it is jarringly out of place every time she pops up - really takes you out of the story of the case and for no purpose.
But more annoying than KC, though, is the lack of cohesive structure to the documentary overall. It doesn't 'flow', it's all over the place. It doesn't cover enough ground, doesn't lean in to the science and evidence/investigation anywhere near as much as one would expect from this sort of documentary.
This could have been a really compelling look at a tragic and multi faceted cold case. It's not.
There is a strange, disjointed timeline of events, interspersed with inappropriate scenes of KC walking through woods spouting nature metaphors and such.
Her scenes add absolutely nothing to the documentary; it felt like a sponsored advertisement every time she spoke. I fail to understand why she was on screen at all, it is jarringly out of place every time she pops up - really takes you out of the story of the case and for no purpose.
But more annoying than KC, though, is the lack of cohesive structure to the documentary overall. It doesn't 'flow', it's all over the place. It doesn't cover enough ground, doesn't lean in to the science and evidence/investigation anywhere near as much as one would expect from this sort of documentary.
This could have been a really compelling look at a tragic and multi faceted cold case. It's not.
Tell Your Friends