Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Intimate Encounters (1986 TV Movie)
4/10
A housewife who daydreams...
1 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Julie Atkins has been married for 15 years to Nick (James Brolin, I really had forgotten he was in this movie!) who's a very busy man always in business meetings and trips (it's not clear what he does for a living, but he works hard to keep their lifestyle).

As a housewife she's bored. She and her husband used to be seen by others as "Barbie and Ken", and she misses the old days of young lust, adventures and passion. At the same time, she attends college to get a diploma in Special Education. Apparently, she's good with kids, but she's always distracted which makes difficult to retain theory.

Nick is very aloof of her wife's attempts to revive their relationship that has become stale and very domestic. Julie starts daydreaming with sexual fantasies that are really hilarious because Donna Mills doesn't show one bit of skin. There's nothing steamy about them. As if they're porn inspired (smoking environment, hot guys with chiseled features, heavy sax in the background, etc.), but she's still dressed from head to toe.

Due to her constant daydreaming, she burns the breakfast, floods the kitchen while washing the dishes, almost crashes her car.

The script is really cheesy. The only thing Julie comes up with is "fear" every time someone is asking what is wrong with her, including her therapist (Cicely Tyson). I mean, if you're not honest with your own therapist who's there to listen to your darkest thoughts, so then, who else can help you?

By the time she goes back to therapy, she already started acting on those sexual fantasies and can't stop. I'm not sure whether she wants romance or just wants to have sex with other men...because in the end, that's all what she gets from her lovers: one-night stands. She seems to be a sex addict? Plus, we don't see a change from the supposedly "frumpy" wife to a sexier wife now that she gets more attention from men.

It is as if production or the suits couldn't let this movie be about a woman who wanted to explore her sexuality, and they tried to fix it hinting that Julie only misses her husband's attention (there's a pathetic scene in a restaurant when she tries to tell him that the man at the next table is flirting with her just get him jealous).

Anyway, it's good '80s nostalgia. Don't ask for quality, just dive into it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
She Led Two Lives (1994 TV Movie)
5/10
INTERESTING SUBJECT
23 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Connie Sellecca plays Rebecca, a very immature woman who clearly doesn't know what real love is. She feels abandoned by her first husband, Jeffrey (Perry King), who's a surgeon and doesn't have much time for her, which is the normality in such a well-paid and high-end profession, especially if you work in a hospital. Her attitude annoys me because Jeffrey provides her the lifestyle she always wanted (as a socialite), with only a part time job as a professor in a university out of town. She is academically ambitious and her husband, although not perfect, is very supportive.

When she meets Mike, her old high-school sweetheart, things get complicated.

She doesn't tell Mike she's married and starts a whirlwind love affair that leads her to marry him on a whim just because Mike is a very pushy man and she wants to continue to live in this romantic fantasy world.

Foolishly, Rebecca believes she can keep two separate lives and love two men at the same time, since she only sees Jeffrey (her first husband) on the weekends.

She tries to convince herself that she loves both men for different reasons: Jeffrey is dependable and safe and Mike is passionate and makes her high.

This movie is not high art, it's rather entertaining because it's a trainwreck. They try to make it dramatic but it's borderline comedic. I really wanted to throttle Connie Sellecca for acting so silly and believing she could hold the charade forever. If you ask me, there is no way I would have cheated on Perry King because he's PERRY KING. LOL.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
TRAINWRECK THAT I CAN'T STOP WATCHING
21 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
It's not a perfect movie, but the depicting of the crazy 1920s is convincing.

Jolly Grimm (James Coco) is a silent comic whose career is circling the drain. Nobody is interested in his celebrity and tries desperately to sell his last production. For that reason, he organizes a party at his mansion and invites la créme de la créme in Hollywood to close a deal.

Queenie (Raquel Welch), a former vaudeville dancer and singer, is his loyal lover. Grimm abuses her verbally and physically. He says he loves her, but unloads all his anger and frustration on her, especially when drunk. Long time ago, when Queenie was a young and starving starlet, he promised her a movie career, but in reality, he only gave her the job as his arm-candy and nothing else for fear of losing her. He even says that her only work is to look pretty and keep her mouth shut.

Dale Sword (Perry King) is the new kid in town, a dashing and handsome young actor who has taken Lalaland by assault with only one movie under his arm.

From then on, the movie takes a 180° turn from a sort of goofy musical to a very dark story.

To be honest, I watched this movie because I was interested in a young Perry King. I was surprised to know that his career wasn't only about Riptide or Class of 1984, but he had other interesting roles during the '70s like this one, directed by James Ivory.

The ending is a bit abrupt. Grimm would be the only character who's more rounded. You don't have time to feel sorry for Queenie or James Morrison (David Dukes), the narrator.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
INTERESTING SUBJECT
14 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
What can I say? I'm on a mission of tracking down most of Don Johnson's movies he made before becoming famous and I came across this one. I thought it was made for TV, but I was stunned to see naked people and a frontal nude by Johnson almost at the beginning of this flick.

It's very much a product of its era tackling topics such as sexual revolution, free love, the institution of marriage and possessiveness within a couple. They even talk about group marriages.

Don Johnson plays one of the students at the Harrad College who are involved in an one-month experiment in which they are paired with other students of the oppposite sex. They don't know each other, have been assigned by the couple of psychologists-sexologists leading this investigation, a sort of rip off of Masters and Johnson played by James Whitmore and Tippi Hedren. They're expected to start a sexual relationship and explore the dynamics of love, jealousy, exclusivity and honesty.

Stanley (Johnson) is paired with Sheila (Laurie Walters), a conservative, sweet and virginal girl who has self-esteem and shyness issues and wants to develop a loving relationship before starting to have sex. She wants to "make it right". So she is the quintessential "good girl". Sheila falls almost immediately for Stanley (and who wouldn't?, Don Johnson looks beautiful here), but Stanley has compulsive sexual encounters as if he drinks a bottle of cola and tosses it to the side. "No strings attached" or "as many as he can" should be his motto. Stanley is not capable of feeling love, but only lust. He doesn't want to connect at a personal level. Although, Sheila seems to touch something inside of him.

It's not the best movie, but it was entertaining...Sometimes I think how is it that the actors didn't burst into laughing during the naked yoga scene? However, it has a charm. It's a rarity.

I felt awkward watching Tippi Hedren getting hit on by her future son-in-law Don Johnson (I think this is the movie where he met Melanie Griffith. She worked as an extra).
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Plenty (1985)
7/10
SHALLOWNESS AFTER WAR
13 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I remember this movie was panned by some critics. Sting was a target of their ironies.

When I had access to cable TV I could watch it for the first time and it seemed like a series of vignettes of Susan's different stages in life and I hated her. I thought she was self-centered and self-righteous. Despicable character. Well, that's what I thought when I was 18.

I watched it once again recently now as an adult and I had a different perspective. I saw a woman who spent her youth as part of an exciting period of history (WWII), risking her life for a cause that she thought was significant. When the war was over, the film shows her difficulty at fitting in back to her mundane life in England with a string of unsatisfactory jobs. The main issue here is that she tries to find a meaning to her life now that there is nothing to fight for. Her mind is still in France when she joined the resistance.

She is desperate to find something exciting again. So she finds a man to father a child (she doesn't want a relationship, just a man to get her impregnated) and fails, then, she marries a dull diplomatic employee who, for some reason, stands by her for more than a decade hoping for this selfish woman to appreciate him, and she fails. She's unlikeable, but at the same time realistic.

Add to the mix a mental illness and it's not a movie for the ones who expect a resolution. Because there's none. Just like real life. She feels empty in an upper-class world plenty of material things, but nothing of substance.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Idol (1966)
5/10
I watched it because of Michael Parks
6 May 2021
As I just watched Wild Seed (1965), I wanted to try with another movie where Michael Parks looked his best and I found it. Someone here compared it with Plan 9 From Outer Space by Ed Wood...C'mon! It's not that terrible. That's an exaggeration. Plan 9 is senseless and terribly acted. Hilariously horrible, though.

The Idol is not the best movie, but not the worse. I love that it was shot in London. The problem here is that I never understood the motivation behind The Idol (Parks). And I believe it's a problem with the script. They don't hint why he is self-destructive and obnoxious towards people around. As some reviewer said here, James Dean had a reason behind his rebelliousness. Here, we're left with nothing, but a bad taste.

I thought I was going to hate Jennifer Jones' character, but then, I kind of understood her point of view of a repressed woman from a different era, who felt a bit thrown-off by the modern generation and their liberties. It was an interesting and entertaining story, but without much explanation by the end.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed