14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Nefarious (2023)
4/10
Starts off great
18 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
...but quickly deteriorates into standard "faith" clichés. Others have synopsized the film so I'll skip it. What I can tell you is that no Atheist *or* Psychologist would, with any kind of experience under his belt, give any credence to this scenario. That the Atheist Psychologist had first profited millions from an assisted suicide and then stood to avoid responsibility by letting his girlfriend abort their child was too much and I had to stop watching at that point. I knew that the "you will commit three murders" thing would be some other Catholic talking point just like all the others in such films. It's essentially the same script as God's Not Dead and all other films with "atheist" characters who are torn down by the "truth of faith."

That being said, Flannery gave a stellar performance shifting back and forth between emotions and voices, hampered only by the fact that both personalities had a stutter--if they had spoken different accents or dialects, that would have sold it completely.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Damsel (2024)
2/10
Evil Wins
14 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This movie doesn't understand the first thing about how European royalty or nobility works--but it hates men, doesn't it?

In a vain attempt to invert the trope of St. George & The Dragon, the movie revises history to make George a coward who murders unborn dragons in their eggs instead of a living, adult one. This angers the dragon, who then demands female sacrifices in perpetuity for the offense. Several remarkably diverse girls later and white Girl Boss is selected, doped with a few drops of prince blood and tossed into the dragon's cave to be eaten (it's a lot of effort and subterfuge for what could have been done faster and more efficiently with kidnapping and drugs). Several remarkably convenient coincidences later and Girl Boss defeats but befriends the dragon to take revenge on the royals who tossed her to her death.

The "throw off the chains of the patriarchy" narrative is hilariously over-the-top, aided along the way by a complete misunderstanding of European tradition--or even basic biology and physics. And without that "A Doll's House" reversal of all continuity near the end this story would have been credible. As it is, it's an empowerment fantasy in which a girl with little value in her adventure immediately gains exactly what she needs merely by needing it, and ends up crushing much more experienced adversaries without taking any real damage along the way. Basically it's Rey Palpatine meets 1981's Dragonslayer--but this time a lot of people doing what they can to save their kingdom are all massacred to protect one female's sense of her own value.
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Chosen (2017– )
5/10
Same as all the others
11 February 2024
The description calls it "groundbreaking" but that's false from the outset.

The Chosen is an historical fiction covering well-trod material that's been in circulation for thousands of years already. All the usual tropes are here: oppressed people, anachronistic 21st century ideology in an Iron Age setting, blithe disregard for the tribalism and vicious savagery that plagued the land prior to Romans bringing law and order, all the usual straw men arguments which Christians struggle and easily defeat, et al.

I bailed after the first episode because the show just didn't hold my interest. It's the same material recycled for the zillionth time in a vain effort to make it appealing to the mythical "modern audience" by changing the aesthetics. Good budget, modern slang, lots of attempts to make it "relatable" but ultimately the same old schlock that's been told thousands of times before.

And in a few more years, the next iteration will replace this one. Rinse and repeat.
2 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Escape Room (II) (2017)
7/10
Good for what it is
20 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Escape Room is a budget film focused on a well-trod story, however they make the best of what they have and put a nice little spin on things. Some things stand out:

First, there's a red herring when one girlfriend says "I never cheat" while lingering on the boyfriend. I admit my mind jumped to: she's set him up as revenge for infidelity. Happily that's not what happened and she was as much a victim as he. Nice fake-out, writer/director!

Second, the puzzles are genuinely good and intellectual, unlike the "you have to bleed into this vial" one finds in other, similar fare. The camera doesn't linger on them to the point that the viewer can figure them out, so there's an element of trusting the audience's view of the characters.

It's not a bloody (to the point of boring) gore-fest like the Saw movies, but neither is it shy about portraying the deaths. It's in a confined space which is normal for budget films, but they use that space well to add to the claustrophobia the viewer is meant to feel.

If I had any complaints, it's that there's not enough character development--traits are explicitly described ("He's good at this sort of thing!") that should be demonstrated earlier.

I like it, and look forward to more work from Wernick.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good for a mid-budget movie
8 June 2023
Reminds me a lot of early 80s horror in which they didn't have a lot to work with but still made it good. One can tell that the crew did a lot with a little, particularly when compared to "modern" movies. The ambience is gorgeous, atmosphere creepy and malign when it needs to be, and they really know how to set up and pay off a scene. The stories are typical horror fare, but with enough variation and twists to make each treatment interesting and relatively new.

This is one of those instances in which skill and dedication wins over money. They had enough of a budget to get their points across, which puts them WAY ahead of a lot of big budget productions relying too much on jump scares and CGI. The film in its various parts rely on competent storytelling and cinematography and succeeds every time. We need more films like this one.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Four hours of unsubstantiated anecdotes
10 March 2019
This is it? This is the smoking gun of Jackson's guilt: two guys who've changed their stories over and over depending on the possible financial gain over the years making claims that never go anywhere but who emote for the camera. This is Last Jedi level of incompetent.
20 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One Day at a Time (2017–2020)
1/10
If you can't do someting original...
25 January 2019
Modern films and TV shows have a recurring problem: they can't sell their liberal agenda on its own, so they take preexisting properties (Star Wars, Ghostbusters, Star Trek, Dr. Who, etc.) and "reboot" them using whatever cliches are hip in San Francisco and New York on that given week. This, because they know their ideas will fail unless they're associated with a beloved franchise or show. The shills will review them at 10/10 with broad-brush cliches and plenty of exclamation points!!!, which fools no one.

The original ODAAT addressed real problems affecting real lives during its run in the 1970s and early 80s. It was *relatable*. This recycling of the ODAAT title is full of flat cliches & plastic virtue signaling, and their dilemmas (choosing the right pronoun to address a transgendered person) have no bearing on 99.7% of American lives, no matter how aggressively they push them.
38 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Total and complete genius
10 December 2018
When I grow up, I hope to have the level of IDGAF exhibited by this crotchety old man. While I can give or take the song, the visuals of Nimoy going about his business with zero care for the feelings of people around him have elevated this to my favorite video of all time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Annihilation (I) (2018)
3/10
Great concept, poorly executed.
6 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
A biologist, an anthropologist, a psychologist, a surveyor, and a lesbian (which they establish right away) EMT (I think, it went by pretty fast) go into an unknown zone with NO PROTECTIVE GEAR; touch everything they can even though it's alien animal, plant and fungi; fumble around in various stages of confused (but emotionally agitated) and demonstrate they don't know how to handle guns. Leads to a conclusion meant to be scary, but is quite tedious.

They're going for "women in STEM" thing, but... no. The lack of basic discipline inherent in the sciences was apparent to even the layman. It's a therapy session masquerading as science-fiction.
31 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Samson (2018)
4/10
Not a faithful Biblical rendition
17 February 2018
The story of Samson from the book of Judges poses a serious problem for most Biblical storytelling. Taken literally, Samson is a serial killer with a penchant for torturing animals (setting the tails of 300 foxes on fire) who destroys another man's property for marrying his ex-girlfriend. It also demonstrates that Yahweh's blessings can be incredibly arbitrary--such as great strength tied to hair length--and that his chosen representatives on Earth are easily and repeatedly duped. In all, the character of Samson continues to be one of the oddest "heroes" in the four Abrahamic faiths' canon.

That said, the film was bland, plodding, and required a greater suspension of disbelief than one normally must put forward to believe mythological stories. It wants to be taken seriously, as if magic powers weren't the thing of fairy tales.
14 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ugh...
19 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
A couple of years ago, it appeared that a 14yo girl saw the original Star Wars trilogy and decided to re-write the original 1977 film as a fanfic with herself as an über-powered Mary Sue who instinctively had the powers of a Jedi and more of Han Solo's piloting skills than he had in his own ship. Not only that, but she had perfect skin, teeth, and hair despite living on a desert planet, orphaned at a young age and scraping by on scrap metal sales. She had no scars, body marks, burns or anything else--she was a flawless little princess in an extremely hostile (yes, I deployed to the Middle East in the early 1990s) environment. The rest of the story we know, because that fanfic was turned into a movie, The Force Awakens.

The Last Jedi is the fanfic her daddy wrote, to make all the mean people go away by playing fast & loose with forty years of preexisting lore so that it made his baby girl even more impressive. The easiest thing in the world is to look at an established lore and say "that, plus me, times infinity," which is what they did with Rey AND Snoke (which is the kind of name a child gives a snot-based villain).

We're required to believe that the First Order has all but destroyed the Resistance, but just like The Party's propaganda against Immanuel Goldstein in 1984, the former are only portrayed as clumsy buffoons against the latter's pluck and daring. I guess they were trying for a "girl power" angle on the Resistance fleet, with two women in charge. But when male villains are comically inept--and the girls still run away--it turns female empowerment into a farce because there are no real stakes against an incompetent opponent.

We're required to believe that Luke Skywalker tossed aside his father's (and later his own) lightsaber--the only remaining item of the good in the man--as immaterial.

We're required to believe that a neophyte has all (if not more than) the knowledge of a Jedi master, without training, and that she came not from force-sensitive parents but from random civilians with no unique traits. Didn't we already have this character, named Bella Swan?

There's a useless middle section about the evils of wealth and animal abuse which does not belong in the story. A single line from Laura Dern's vice admiral could have saved us this tedium. Nostalgia Critic calls this a "big-lipped alligator moment," but this is easily 1/4 of the film--it serves no purpose other than filling time.

We're required to believe that the man who led the Rebellion, destroyed the Death Star, defeated the Emperor, brought Vader back from the Dark Side, and restored order to the galaxy has become a cowardly recluse because ONE student started going bad. This is the sort of wish-fulfillment a teenager writes about himself after being kicked out of school. We also learn that Yoda was available to advise him as a force ghost, but chose instead to undermine him and destroy the legacy he spent 900 years to build. It's a bit like that godawful trend in Marvel Comics where the "classic" hero meets the new SJW version, has an epiphany and realizes that the latter is a better product, and that he (the classic) should bend the knee.

We're required to believe that the snot-based villain predates the Empire and is more powerful than Palpatine, but his evil consists mostly of saying "I knew that" and making snarky remarks at his emo apprentice, which undermines his own credibility and sets up the "your overconfidence is your weakness" strike you see coming ten miles away.

We're required to believe that the Resistance's survival will be threatened because... well, in The Empire Strikes Back the Imperial fleet couldn't bombard Hoth from orbit and sent walkers instead. But no such barrier exists here and the land-based attack just drags out the run time.

It's obvious that this poor imitation of a Star Wars film was intended to provoke emotions in people who can't maintain intellectual consistency from one moment to the next, but want to be associated with something greater than they are capable of handling.

Han's gone, Luke's gone, and Carrie Fisher can't reprise her role. That leaves Lando, Chewbacca & the droids as the last vestiges of the original series for Disney to throw under the bus for Episode IX: The Final Cash Grab.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slasher (2016–2023)
6/10
Getting better
12 December 2017
Season one of Slasher is what happens when a creator combines the theme of Se7en with the narrative device of Silence of the Lambs and the obnoxious high school reporter from Smallville. It's largely derivative and gets boring rather quickly.

Season two is better, as the story is revealed in various flashbacks over the course of the episodes and not nearly such a copycat of other sources. I puzzled out the killer's identity around episode 3 of 8, but the story kept me interested until the final resolution--which proved me right, but not in the way I'd expected.

Hopefully S3 will be better still.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Never mess with a successful formula
14 November 2017
Pureflix has a single story to sell: family/person in conflict, conflict gets worse, invoke the supernatural and everything magically gets resolved. SKoDaM is the same thing because they know religious people like repetition.

I won't synposize the story here... what's the point? You've already met the characters in a previous Pureflix movie, so it's repetition now. If you liked the previous installments of the family/person, conflict, worsens, magical resolution, you'll like this one.
41 out of 95 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nearly fell asleep twice
12 June 2017
Well that was completely pointless. The trailers sell it as a paranoid mystery, but really it's just a drama of disconnected interactions set in a never-explained crisis. There's no reason to call the film by that title.

Good cinematography and engaging score, tho.
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed