Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Best Movie of 2007
31 December 2007
2007 was a good year and offers many excellent films; domestic and international but among them all, NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, is perhaps the best of the best. (Yes, I have seen THERE WILL BE BLOOD and loved it but due to this film having 10s in all categories, think it best).

Others have already commented in great detail about the storyline so will not address other than to say it was stellar and delivered some of the most memorable one-liners of a single movie that I can easily recall. Though I will say for those who had a problem with the ending, consider seeing it again.

QUESTIONABLE ENDING: The ending was brilliant. We all want to think good guys will triumph and we'll finally know more about the sociopath killers and there will be an end will be in sight but (regrettably) the older we get, the more we come to realize there is likely not going to be an end to maniacal killings, not back when, now or in the future. "Whatever is coming is coming" as the old man says later in the movie. It is a ghost that continues to appear time and time again despite modern technology or know how. Though we've grown accustomed to our Westerns showing the good guys winning we see a realistic, mature and modern Western through the eyes of realism an older experienced lawman who now perhaps recognizes in a dream that a father is preparing the way for him. Think about it. Coen Brothers are brilliant.

SANS MUSIC: No music risky? Yes and oh what a good choice. The screenwriter is so gifted; that combined with impeccable direction, grade A actors,and camera/sound work makes the choice to forgo not only purposeful but actually intensifies the suspense.

Too, one can argue that there was a natural chorus of background sounds, i.e. the wind rustling, car on gravel road, boots on pavement, gravel, the sounds that seem to echo loudly especially in tense moments. While music can be crucial to building dramatic tension it can also detract.

From the very beginning we are purposefully placed, frame by frame, within the film along with the characters; we see and hear what they see and hear. Immediately we - through the passport of our senses, see and hear where we are - vast Texas country flatlands. Instead of a beautiful score to match the panoramic view we hear the beauty of a mature, older man's telling or overview of his experience and we begin to prepare ourselves for what "might be coming".

We hear the sounds of that vastness of country road and see a cop placing a man (only a side-view of Bardem) in handcuffs in backseat of car, then in jail house seated behind him. The camera allows us to focus on conversation of the good-looking deputy in foreground and prisoner in the background with a first look at his face though not clearly the focal point. Then, within seconds we see his advancement, hear and see (from above) the look and sounds of a maniacal first and then second killing.

Then shift to another countryside scene and are behind the gun focus of hunter, Josh Brolin's character, Llewelyn, who is taking aim of a deer. All we hear and see is what he hears. Wind rustling, natural sounds. He's quiet and focused. We're quiet and focused and then, BANG! No music is needed, the action, the natural noise places us squarely where the director wants us, suspensefully riding shotgun throughout the entire movie. And, it works!

CAST: Stellar cast. You know it's stellar when you can't make up your mind which star shines brightest. They all do. Perhaps one of my favs was the character with so little lines, Kelly MacDonald who plays Llewelyn's wife. First, she does a killer southern accent and second, her character is completely believable and you want to see her even more. Each times she's on screen is meaningful and memorable, especially the last scene.

Brolin is also entirely believable as a Texan whose Nam experience (we learn latter) prepares him for absolutely any encounter. His performance deserves nomination for best actor category. The Texas mindset, dry wit, economy of words juxtaposed to swift and decisive actions have never delivered more authentically than they do in this screenplay. Brolin, Lee et-al get it and deliver.

Javier Bardem in the opening scene tells us with no words, only his action and body movements what evil looks like. He is ruthless, calculating and crazed. He's the kind of character that engenders immediate fright and respect for his "principles" as Harrelson describes later. We learn all of this within ONE singular frame shot (from above) in the jail cell when he is strangling the deputy. It is that camera work and focus on Bardem's facial expression (no words and no music) that says it all. This is brilliant direction and acting perfection. He also deserves nomination for best actor and is phenomenal, period!

Tommy Lee Jones delivers a perfect performance. I am always in awe of his ability to develop his character. He can take any role, lead or character, and make you wait with baited breath for his return to the screen. The sheriff is perhaps my favorite character in this movie. Again, the screenwriter really understands Texan mindsets and motivations. TLJones understands it and what he does with the lines and the silence in between the lines is what translates into a winning performance and movie.

CREW: Camera (incredible),Sound (especially), sets, folio, editing, costumes, etc. all impeccable and a real blend of talent.

See this movie and see it again. There's so much that makes it great. It's a winner now and will no doubt become a classic. Well done!
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Masterful Direction, Acting, Cinematography, Set, Lighting, Has it all.
30 December 2007
Those who happen not to have a musical theater affinity may likely be surprised by the ease and inclusiveness of this masterful musical film creation. Perhaps, because I do love stage musicals it was natural to anticipate this film on the one hand, but on the other I wondered and worried about how successful the director and crew would be at transferring the Sondheim genius on to the big screen. I was not disappointed!

Burton and Logan supremely translate the stageplay on screen into the thrilling unfolding of the tale of the Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street, offering brilliant and authentic sets with eery lighting and once the viewer gets passed the first ten minutes or so of lyrics in lieu of lines, even the anti-musical enthusiast will either become a convert or at the least - in this particular instance - easily make the leap into the genre for the next few delightfully thrilling hours.

Of course, the Sondheim tunes are fabulous, the cast talent stellar and Depp's musicality surprised and impressed. Not only with his debut singing abilities but honestly, in his never-ending labryinth of character development and genius. This film, more than any other to date(and he has a lot), shows how incredibly gifted and willing to take risks he is,despite what is or is not kosher in Hollywood or even with public.The hallmark of a gifted actor is one who can really take on the whole spectrum of characters and therefore not a typecast. This man is an actor's actor.

Helena Bonham Carter was hysterical and developed character in a way that mesmerizes you when she's on screen. I could not wait for she and Depp to be back on screen. That said, Alan Rickman was stupendously evil and loved his portrayal of Judge Turpin. Timothy Spall - OMG, he could not have been more deliciously smarmy as Tourpin's sycophant. Sacha Baron Cohen was seriously funny and showed his skills as a dramatic actor. Kudos for Jamie Campbell Bower as perfect Anthony Hope and really enjoyed the performance of Ed Sanders as Toby; worked great with Bonham Carter.

Set design, lighting and cinematography is a dream and in large part is what helps to make the translation from stage to screen so great and enjoyable.

Burton and the entire cast and crew is spot-on and I plan to see this film again and again. Brilliant!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ridley Rocks!
2 November 2007
Finally a good, accurate, gangster drug-trafficking film that makes you think. It's far from Polyanna and lets no-one group off; not gangsters of any race or ethnicity, not cops on the take, addicts, etc. And importantly, the story, based upon the true life story of Frank Lucas, does not profile a stereotypical black gangster gone wrong but instead shows an elegant, intellectual man who rises to the top of his game but then learns something new in the end. The film is a sure-shot into the Oscars but more importantly, for me, it's a film that is socially responsible and imparts a thoughtful message for any viewer,especially in light of current times.

Technically, it's got it all going on. Script,Camera, lighting,and not only par excellence from Crowe and Washington but the entire acting cast. The film uses fabulous close-ups and unbelievably good action shots. I disagree with any reviews that claim the movie is not packed with enough action or violence. How tiresome that would be! Instead, while including some of the best action/violent shots ever filmed, Mr. Ridley gives us a relevant and real-life look into the narcotics business top-to-bottom and across the board. I would far prefer to see a movie that has a dozen or so magnificently staged violent shots that dare to go deeper and translate both internal as well as external motivations as to depict real life. The film is not only entertaining; its portrayal is authentic to the real life grizzly and sometimes grayed world of crime/justice as well as didactic and amazingly...uplifting. What a nice surprise.
152 out of 214 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Original, Warm, Witty, Sensitive
23 October 2007
Ryan Gosling was perfect choice for this witting, warm, original script. His acting ability and range continues to impress. Body language/movements to speech were a 10-match up. Others in cast very good as well. Like "Little Miss Sunshine" this film, while highly unlikely to actually play-out in real-life, was heart-warming and thought-provoking; made me think and stretch some of my own preconceived ideas...and when a film does this, I think it hits the mark. While quite funny in several scenes, this movie is not a comedy but rather a lovely drama of a wounded child who makes his adult passage in an usual way with an unusual amount of love, support and it-takes-a-village kind of patience. Would not be surprised if this film is the new Little Miss Sunshine of the year. Very original and clever film.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lust, Caution (2007)
9/10
Powerful, Mastercrafted Writing/Direction/Cinematography
20 October 2007
Ang Lee proves masterful again - one of the best films this year (foreign or domestic). Lee dares to envision and go where others won't or cannot and does so with such elegance and impact. The film set in pre-Shanghai revolution era (Hong Kong and Shanghai). Dialogues open with fast-paced-authentic-to-Chinese-culture-and-idiosyncrasies women playing at mahjong table. At the table is the lovely protagonist (Tang Wei) and antagonist's wife (Joan Chen) and enter antagonist, Tony Leung Chiu Wai). One initially struggles slightly to keep up with the sub-titles but the camera does such a good job at translating the action that what word or two gets missed is nuanced in meta-message. Also, relief comes soon as we are transported back in time to how the drama begins. This longer film is worth every moment. It engages from start to finish packing top-notch acting from entire cast, superior camera, lighting, costumes and set work. This thrilling espionage takes the viewer through a vast array of mature, complex motives and feelings, intricately woven betwixt and between the contrastual tapestry of the bourgeois and horrors of war. The violence and sex are raw but done in a way to perfectly reflect the characters juxtaposed to wartime/freedom fighter tension. The craftsmanship of this film will no doubt claim awards and will stand the test of time.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant writing, directing,acting, photography& sound/folio
17 June 2007
La Vie en Rose is one of the best films this year! It is, despite those who say the direction and writing and artistic choices to go back and forth in time and screen sequence was less than perfect. It was awesome and needed a vehicle such as this to show the depth and layering of this oh-so-intricate-character and artist. Her life was far from linear and it would have been a mistake to attempt that kind of reasoning and formula. The artistic direction was sophisticated.

But what really impressed me was the acting by Marion Cotillard. Not only did she imbue the heart and soul of the Little Sparrow, Edith Piaf, but she lived her in every scene, every body movement, gesture, especially as her character aged and her body wore out with drugs/alcohol. The camera capture was exquisite. The details in folio were flawless.

Even for those who are not familiar with the life and work of Edith Piaff, despite it's non-linear progression, it's a jewel of a film and one I plan to see many times. Bravo!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shopgirl (2005)
8/10
Great little movie!
13 November 2005
Excellent movie! What a surprise. Steve Martin does a brilliant thing here in cinematography. From the very first scenes and throughout the movie, you feel as though you are watching a movie within an art gallery somehow. It's so masterful and sublime. Each frame is beautifully captured - colors, texture, angles.

The screenplay is very good; current, believable, profound, comedic and touching. If I could change anything it would be Mr. Martin's voice-over towards the end. I've scratched my head about why I feel this way. It's a small point really, but he did such a fine job of transporting you through this very carefully crafted, artistic lens that it somehow did not fit for me. Perhaps it is because his voice is SO very "branded" as a comedian, or too close to the movie that he failed to "color" the profoundity of the words he was using. Mr. Martin, et all were excellent in the acting however and I would still, give this move an 8 or 9 - well worth seeing...more than once!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good, interesting choices in direction, casting and editing
13 November 2005
The actor I thought I would be most adverse to was the one I was the most impressed with -- MacFayden. He portrayed a very believable Darcy and was - in his own choices and style - convincing and quite attractive. Less impressed was I with other actors and their character development. Knightly as E.Bennett was not believable and lacked a certain kind of, let's say, sophistication that Austin fans are so attracted to. I far preferred the Caroline Bingley that was portrayed in the mini-series. The character development was superior and timeless to the qualities of snobbery and prejudice. Kelly Reilly was transparently "today" and again, lacked the period sophistication portrayed so brilliantly in the book and mini series. Also, In the book and in the mini series, one could hardly wait for Lady Catherine de Bourg to be on camera. The editing choices in this movie left her part wanting and as much as I admire Dame Judi Dench, was not at all satisfied with the portrayal. Tom Hollander was a terrific Mr. Collins - physical type and acting ability, choices seemed a good match! I especially liked the camera angles and shots of the countryside.I wondered long and hard about the edits that would be necessary to make this movie and knew it would be tough. On the one hand it was believable to see the chickens, geese and animals back-dropped on the Bennett property and perhaps filled in questions that people have speculated about over the years. But, on the other hand,I did not get a sense of connectedness from character to character, family to family and an authentic connection especially to the period sophistication and mannerisms. I did not want the script changed or interpreted for me as though it were iambic pentameter or something. I wanted it portrayed exactly as it were - an enchanting piece of literature representing an enchanting period of time. That said, if you've not ever seen the mini series or read the book, it is a good movie.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed