Reviews

29 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Basquiat (1996)
8/10
Beautiful, flawed film
21 April 2024
A striking black artist gazes at an angelic diner waitress bathed in sunlight in a Manhattan breakfast shop. He pours maple syrup over a bare wood table carving out beautiful, elongated eyes that mimic the server's cat-like features. A manager erases the beautiful image with a wet rag and throws out the artist, but the server chases after him. This early scene alone showcases the film's strengths: visual composition and actor Jeffery Wright. Natural sunlight on film seemed so refreshing and stunning like the crown Basquiat often featured in his paintings. The surreal flashbacks of Basquiat's childhood were dreamy and stylish. Early scenes depicting Basquiat's late night calls to mental health hot lines then remixing his own calls into club music are troubling. Basquiat seems to think art as therapy may save him, while anyone watching will not. Basquiat's professional life gets better when his targeted restaurant hustle pays off and Andy Warhol loves his work. I'm a major David Bowie fanatic, so I found his Andy Warhol portrayal delightful. The movie showcases the collaboration but also shows Basquiat dealing with racism and scrutiny from others within the high fashion world. Tatum O'Neal and Courtney Love make memorable appearances. Although Basquiat's star is rising, his personal life suffers and the film takes a sadder turn.

1996 was a transitional year in films. Blockbusters and sequels were usually huge summer movies like Terminator 2. Basquiat would have been unusual for Hollywood to make. I wasn't surprised the movie downplayed Basquiat's relationships with men. There is only one line Basquiat says referencing bisexuality at all: "My boyfriend left me." Some critics find other aspects of the portrayal troubling; I felt at times drug use was glorified (this was at the height of heroin chic). But even making this film at all in 1996 was a task. I don't recall the film being shown in a theater near me in Birmingham, Alabama, but that was not my best year (to say the least) and there may be memory gaps. Birmingham was notorious for not showing controversial movies at the time, however.

I can't forgive the movie's crimes of fashion. The characters often dress as if it's 1996 instead of 1986 when the film is set. The clothes look great but feel more nineties than eighties to me at times. Basquiat walked runways and loved clothes. He wore beautiful suits and ties; where are the suits? Jeffery Wright said he clashed with the director over the portrayal of Basquiat during filming. He felt Basquiat was being portrayed as weaker. The strange censorship of suits could be evidence that he had a point. Did the director want Basquiat to dress in more flowy clothes that looked less powerful? I don't have enough information to say.

Finally, I disagree with the consensus of some critics that the director made the film to promote his own career. Gary Oldman's character is based on the writer/ director but he was a very minor character. Basquiat is the sun and he's Pluto. There is a humility in that. Creating the film was perhaps a friend's loving tribute.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Artful Dodger (2023– )
8/10
Amazing performances
20 March 2024
As a fan of both the 1967 movie Oliver! And author Charles Dickens, I was excited about watching The Artful Dodger. The casting is extraordinary. Familiar characters are given a twist without that "wet lettuce" Oliver Twist. And yet... I couldn't shake off some of the show's departures from Dickens. Is Fagin even Jewish anymore? Would Dodger really settle into a surgeon's workhorse life? But, a series even bringing up such questions must be doing something right.

The show may share some of Dickens' faults as a writer: moralizing. Of course, our heroine rejects Victorian womanhood and loves science as she should. And she loathes the ignorance and filth around her just as a modern young woman might. But, some of the Victorian tropes from Oliver Twist come up. Do we admire Belle more because she is "the closest thing to royalty...here."? Just like Oliver was really an heir and not a poor street urchin (sorry, spoiler alert for Oliver Twist.) Maybe Belle the Governor's daughter just reminds me of Hermione Granger at times.

The Australian setting does offer possibilities and perils. But I can't help but mourn what we're losing- Victorian London. Of course, I'm only two episodes in as of now. I'm hoping Fagin will discuss his Judaism and everyone will jaunt off to see Big Ben- but I'm not holding my breath. Dickens based Fagin on a real criminal who was also sent to Australia before being hung- if I remember Wikipedia correctly. I'm fascinated by Ron Moody's take on Fagin in Oliver! And how the actor insisted on avoiding antisemitism from old stage traditions. I'm glad to see another take on the character. I look forward to the next episode. As for Fagin's partner in crime, have no notes on the Artful Dodger performance- it's perfect.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Feud (2017–2024)
9/10
Review: Season 2 Feud Capote vs. the Swans
9 March 2024
I'd enjoyed the first season of Feud and I was so excited about the second. It did not disappoint. The ensemble cast is truly a dream. Naomi Watts, Tom Hollander, Demi Moore, Calista Flockhart, Molly Ringwald, Chloe Seveigny and Diane Lane? It's too much. But, swans themselves are too much. The series recreates a slice of 1960's NYC glamour- the hair is big and so is the drama. I love French food so the landmark restaurant where much of the series takes place, La Cote Basque, would be amazing to visit. As long as someone else is paying the bill.

It's amazing how well Calista Flockhart and Chloe Seveigny disappear into characters very different from themselves. I've always been obsessed with the Kennedy's, so Jackie O's sister, Lee Radziwell, is a particularly interesting character. Calista Flockhart plays her as a mean girl down to the bone. The Swans memorably side eye anyone who dares sit down at their premium table at La Cote Basque without an invite. Poor Demi Moore's character is often caught in the glare of disapproval.

Tom Hollander's characterization of Capote is beyond amazing. Somehow, in spite of the funny voice, Capote is terribly human. My favorite episode was "the James Baldwin" episode where the activist and writer visits Truman. The actor portraying Baldwin does an amazing job, but his sonorous voice was more reminiscent of Keith David than the real Baldwin. Despite how much fun I was having watching the two characters simply visit a museum, I couldn't shake an awareness that the actors were straight men portraying gay characters. But, the performances were so charismatic that I'm sure even Truman Capote and James Baldwin are delighted in heaven by the handsome actors' portrayals.

The heart of the series, however, is the lifelong connection between Truman and Babe Paley. Naomi Watts looks a bit ridiculous in Babe's beehive updo and affects a throaty voice, but her scenes still made me cry at times. She does bring leading lady gravitas to the show, but it's hard to understand what Truman and Babe had in common. Treat Williams gives an amazing performance as Babe's husband, William Paley. His masculine character seems foreign to the Swan's domain, but that's probably the point.

The only real complaint I have about the series is that there aren't enough episodes. The fictional Truman Capote somehow even manages to sell some aspects of late stage alcoholism. My husband noticed the character stirring his vodka with a peppermint stick and wanted to try it for himself. Maybe we all need another "drinkie poo" and a table at La Cote Basque. RIP Truman.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a sad, tragic story
6 March 2024
Max seems to play on Netflix's documentary style in this sad tale. There's even a slim, hyper man who keeps reminding us "I'm a journalist," but he isn't nearly as kooky as Netflix's self-described "aviation journalist." (As a kooky, semi-successful writer, I can relate.)

The story follows the tale of a John Doe found dead in a tent. Along the way, we learn about Appalachian trail culture, internet sleuths (and trolls), and, finally, the rather disappointing ending. When the previously mentioned journalist hyped about "a bad, bad man" in the trailer, I was expecting a serial killer or something to emerge. The truth is much sadder.

One wonders if Max isn't a bit condescending to its interviewees. Why show us the saddest geriatric square dance ever performed? Why linger on petty squabbles amongst internet sleuths? What was the point of a camera shot of a ceiling fan and then a Mr. Coffee machine? I still love Max, but I might choose a documentary about something historical next time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Luminous performances
3 November 2023
I'd never watched Ordinary People until a few days ago. I'd forgotten what a drama could be. The town and the family house are almost characters themselves. To see wood paneling on walls in a stately home brings back nostalgia. Of course, Timothy Hutton is our protagonist and stand out, but it's Mary Tyler Moore's work that really resonates with me. Her character might be dismissed as a "bad mother trope" by feminists today, but, for me, she embodies the values and shortcomings of The Silent Generation and their ultimate failure as perfect parents. Moore's triumph in creating a character so opposite of her sitcom triumphs cannot be overstated. There is no television charisma in the stiffness and stoic silence Mary Tyler Moore brings to her performance.

A nagging loose end that permeates the film is the deceased brother. Without spoiling the reveal at the end, the brother simply seems to be unintelligent and unbelievable. So much so, I've imagined a sequel in which the brother is revealed to have faked his death resulting in the main character beating him up for all the unnecessary therapy and trauma.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This movie is the hero DC needs right now...
28 August 2023
Watching The Flash on streaming last night left a void in my psyche that only The Dark Knight could fill. In 2008, how could I have appreciated what I was seeing in the theater? How could I know it was the end of an era before CG took over completely? Or that it was a masterpiece? I hadn't liked Batman Begins wholeheartedly. I hadn't liked the "excessive" martial arts in the movie because Batman "wasn't a kung fu hero", in my typically myopic opinion. But The Dark Knight never pulled its punches and outdid its predecessor in its psychotic bank heist opening scenes.

In the wake of my disenchantment in the MCU and the Snyderverse at DC (as of this writing), my heart now skips a beat at movie moments I'd taken for granted. Aerial shots of beautiful, glittering buildings. Practical effects and explosions. We may never get such sights back again, or a such a massive budget being used effectively.

Heath Ledger's performance has become legend and deservedly so. However much we may mourn the late actor, his Joker is still very much viscerally frightening. I should perhaps wrap up this review with a conclusion, a discussion of plot, or a paragraph that encapsulates ordered thought. But, I can occasionally be an agent of chaos (in writing anyway) like the Joker. He would never linger too long after something stops being fun. Maybe superhero movies have stopped being fun and The Dark Knight is just a relic from the past.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Devil's Hour (2022– )
8/10
Hooked in...
22 August 2023
Brilliant acting, glossy production. Eagerly awaiting more episodes... This will no doubt be a triumph.

Picky, picky paragraph: Did the ghost of Charles Dickens appear in the writing room? The seedy lower class characters seem to have stepped out of his novels. Bill Sykes' bull dog even makes an appearance in the first episode. It's easy to spot our leading actors, though, because they're Milan runway thin. Maybe Capaldi put an addendum on his contract that leading actors should share his body type?

Struggling to relate to the lead character. Even if she has issues with her ex, why would she choose to be alone in the house with her creepy child and her nightmares? As a teenager, I felt like the social worker who visited after a house fire was condescending, so I'm not biased towards her particular profession. However, she has empathy while on the job despite her imperfections.

All of these nitpicks floated in my mind during the first episode. But, then, Capaldi appears on screen. The plot thickens. I'm going to keep watching.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Idol (2023)
7/10
tongue in cheek?
5 June 2023
The buzz around The Idol lured me to watch the first episode. It was... interesting. My favorite scene involved the Vanity Fair interview: the reporter with a frightening red bob, long legs, and an androgynous voice keeps pausing her phone's recording to "go off the record," but Jaclyn(?) keeps hitting the play button. Someone whispers "Brigitte Bardot" during the leading lady's photo shoot, but her uncanny, airbrushed looks reminded me more of a mature Bratz Doll. The orchestrated nudity seemed PG... is she really topless if she's an CG?

It's often the supporting actors that command attention. Is that Eli Roth? Is that an insane balcony outdoor sectional? That's the son of the Dad from American Pie? Is that the she-pimp from Hung?

The artist formerly know by a W name shows up to his own party fashionably late. And I learned something new from the dialogue. You see, I had mistakenly thought Diana Ross sung "I Love to Love You Baby," but it was the queen of disco, Donna Summer.

Perhaps the next episode will reveal more of the growing relationship between "Choke Me- Bratz Doll" and "Mr. Trench Coat," but I'm not sure I'll stick around.
24 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love & Death (2023)
7/10
Great performances in a mixed bag
28 April 2023
My mother converted away from the Methodist to nondenominational Christianity because she called the Methodist Church a "dead church." Well, Mom must never have visited Candy Montgomery's Methodist church because there was a whole lot of something going on! I was fascinated by the sets and costumes and the series gets a lot right. The music department sets the scene with disco hits from the era, but no country music is played. Wouldn't the soundtrack of Texas at the time include Dolly Parton and Kenny Rogers or Eddie Rabbit? It's as if the production department has no real interest or ability to capture the scene or humanize the characters; it's kind of a melodrama in a groovy wax museum.

Elizabeth Olson is pitch perfect here as the restrained yet unhinged Candy. The awkward "affair" plays out in fits and starts, yet I can't imagine someone as beautiful as Elizabeth Olson settling for tacky motel rooms in real life. Candy's joyful sensuality seems to be contrasted with Betty's (her romantic rival) rigid views of sex. A scene where Betty forbids her daughter from trick-or-treating dressed as a pink lady from Grease reveals the character to be a ticking time bomb. I'm only three episodes in and I know the series is building momentum to an explosive conclusion.

The series is weird and interesting. Elizabeth Olson is a leading lady who can carry a show and she has a lot of talent to back her up. I wish Kristen Ritter had more to do here than play a supporting friend to Candy. Her noncommittal "cool" disco dance was unforgettable and a perfect contrast to Candy's crazed freestyle dancing in a rare dance scene.
24 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Molly's Game (2017)
7/10
Well-paced, thoughtful
23 February 2023
I chose Molly's Game while scrolling through Netflix because of the high-quality cast: Jessica Chastain, Kevin Costner, Michael Cera, and Idris Elba. Being the sort of Las Vegas tourist who does not gamble, but enjoys the city's slot machines as beautiful scenery, perhaps I'm not the intended audience for a poker movie. And that brings me to my first ambiguity: what is the film's genre? Thriller, sports movie, biopic, true crime? I'm not sure, even after watching.

Ambiguity is a word that could be applied to Jessica Chastain. There's a measured neuroticism to her performance that does fit an ex-Olympic level skier turned professional poker maven, yet, like poker, the actress is hard to read. Her voice doesn't quite lose its modulated pitch, not even when upset, but she is playing a perfectionist, high achiever who is so tightly wound, her emotional coils often pop. Frequent off-camera narration illustrating her character Molly Bloom's sensationalized memoir must be intended to invoke the book, but it seems a bit much at times. (I became aware of the pitfalls of too much movie narration watching the infamous Plan 9 from Outer Space.) Is Chastain miscast? I did not get a sense of the character's real-life Jewish roots from the performance and I can't help but wonder what a more emotive actor like Lady Gaga could have brought to the role. But, the supporting cast knocks it out of the park. I have never enjoyed a Kevin Costner performance quite so much. Idris Elba makes some quirky acting choices and his lawyer character stands out.

The film wears a feminist veneer with Molly Bloom being subjected to abuse by several unhinged male criminal types. I say "veneer" because Chastain is largely the only woman in the film, and the unhinged male performances are the most interesting thing on camera. In effect, the bad behavior steals every scene. Michael Cera as Player X is a hoot. I also enjoyed "Bad Brad" and "Harlan." Another scene in which a poker player asks Molly to go to Cabo with him seems strangely performative. The lines might as well have been: "You're a leading lady who meets all the contemporary beauty standards. I'm going to go through the motions of a come-on without any sex appeal involved." "Yes, I check all the boxes. All the men here succumb to my obvious charms. Let's end the dialogue."

Other abusive gamblers use and abuse Molly throughout the film, and as someone who's been dismissed unfairly by male bosses in my life, I can relate. But when Molly hires women herself, stunning looks are a prerequisite, but we're told in narration that all the hires are inordinately clever "play mates." Much less screen time is devoted to Molly's working relationships with other women. In her family life, Molly's relationship with her mother is never quite fleshed out; only her relationship with her father is developed.

It's an interesting well-paced movie that is worth watching. One scene at an ice rink is so good that it makes the entire film worth watching.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amsterdam (2022)
6/10
disappointed
9 December 2022
Upon seeing the preview, I was very excited to see Amsterdam. So many superb actors, beautiful lighting, but, closeups of Margot Robbie's glorious artificially enhanced face juxtaposed near WWI early plastic surgery masks are too much accidental irony to handle. Christian Bale is all in with a vintage accent, scrunched face, and bent posture, but the magic doesn't happen.

Actual 1930's films had strange looking character actors, but everyone in this film is impossibly good looking and dressed to the nines. All the WWI nostalgia ignores the fact that the War was a pointless European fiasco. Yes, the only bright light was African-American soldiers falling in love with France and Amsterdam I suppose, and the Harlem Renaissance coming out of that, but this is not the story this film tells. I often reflect on the film The Godfather II as not only a tragic instance of a director catering to actors at the expense of a great American writer, Mario Puzo, but the beginning of a new era in film where the actor is everything. Amsterdam perhaps represents the culmination of this approach. The actors are here in all their glory but the script is lacking.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than Apt Pupil...
7 October 2022
A disappointing film, also based on a Stephen King story, Apt Pupil promised scares in its preview, yet delivered little more than a slightly singed cat. At least this film gives us a beautiful mansion and slightly more payoff. Like Apt Pupil, this film explores a morally dubious older man influencing a younger character. It is worth watching to hear Donald Sutherland's voice without having to watch an orange juice commercial.

As a bitter writer critical of Stephen King, one can postulate that the younger character is shown reading eloquent prose in literature, only to later focus on journalism, as symbolic of King's own rejection of tradition in literature and subsequent unease. Perhaps he can hear the ghosts of other writers calling out to him from the grave.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blonde (2022)
7/10
Interesting time capsule
30 September 2022
I'd forgotten reading Blonde until Marilyn's romp with two men flashed across the screen. All the Marilyn myths were familiar to me: the bad mother, the dresser drawer, the casting couch, but I'd forgotten Blonde, specifically. I grew up in a used bookstore, the place I walked to after school instead of walking home. Blonde was amongst the used fiction titles, pages smelling of someone's cigarettes, mold and dogs.

As a fan, I feel musical comedy was Marilyn's forte, but the movie seems to feel movies like Gentlemen Prefer Blondes or The Seven Year Itch were tragic missteps. I think Arthur Miller's play The Crucible is heavy handed, but the movie sees it differently.

Classic film scenes are recreated with editing magic. You'd almost think it was Marilyn, almost. The movie isn't perfect: its sensibility landing as if Megan Markle were narrating the audiobook of The Valley of the Dolls in all seriousness, but the questions Blonde asks hang in the air. And for one moment, I was a teenager in a used bookstore again.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Empty Man (2020)
7/10
Fascinating thriller
22 September 2022
I knew nothing of this film when I clicked play on HBOMax. The opening sequence, set somewhere in Bhutan, was tense, chilling, and well-executed. Two couples are climbing a snowy mountain when one of the group disappears in a ravine. His brother finds him whispering and unresponsive. He ignores the warning, "If you touch me, you will die," in spite of a creepy multi-limbed skeleton sitting nearby in the cave.

After the opening, a mysterious new character eats at a very nice Mexican restaurant, paying for his dinner with a faded "birthday voucher" but leaving the server a nice tip. The character becomes embroiled with a neighbor's disappearance and a high school group's involvement with "The Empty Man," which may have something to do with the events in Bhutan.

The movie slows down after an exhilarating cold open, but builds back to a steadily paced film. I enjoyed the set design, especially the rustic snowy cabin and bridge sequences. The musical score created tension, but often with jarring ambient sounds.

I think some of my favorite sequences involved circuitous philosophical discussions, especially an amazing "sermon" by a cult leader. I've been critical of some 'New Age' groups, but I felt myself defending them as I watched the film. The movie may be casting a negative light on practices like meditation, which is actually good for mental health. (There's a shot of a prayer wheel in the beginning that might indicate the filmmaker's unease with meditation and religious belief.) But, oddly, the film seems less worried about New Age cults and more concerned with the possibility of a supernatural abyss. All in all, I learned more from watching this film than I did in dozens of philosophy discussions in college.

This movie was creative and definitely worth the watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lansky (2021)
8/10
Fine acting and a solid script
27 January 2022
I feel obligated to write a positive review about a Sam Worthington film, although I've never forgiven the actor for mostly removing wonderful Beebo the Owl from The Clash of the Titans remake. He gives a fine performance here and perfectly compliments Harvey Keitel. Worthington really seems like a writer down on his luck in a seedy motel in Florida and adds realism to the performance.

The script captures the language of Meyer Lansky and even reminded me of Damon Runyon movies like Lady for a Day or Guys and Dolls. Damon Runyon knew Lansky's mentor, Rothstein, portrayed as a character in The Great Gatsbys and Boardwalk Empire, so that's a compliment. I was a bit disappointed that Rothstein isn't portrayed in this film, but lines like "I cannot dismiss this loyalty" were spot on. The story is refreshing after reading Havana Nocturne, a nonfiction book that covered Lansky's life as it pertains to Fidel Castro's takeover. The book was too sympathetic to Fidel Castro, almost portraying him as a hero and vilifying the mob, but this movie might go too far in the other direction. The flashbacks offer a fascinating glimpse into a violent past.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Intriguing and well-constructed
16 January 2022
The film documents the story of Misha and the people it impacted. The documentary then pulls away the layers of truth and deception and reveals the shocking motives Misha may have had for telling her tale.

I'm left with perhaps more sympathy for Misha than the filmmakers. Her childhood taught her social cruelty, that people could label you and punish you based on a narrative. Why then, would she feel any guilt over controlling her own narrative and benefitting from it? The cruelty that she endured as a war orphan did not teach her empathy; she learned that people would only sympathize with her if the narrative was right. A Holocaust survivor calls Misha "villain and victim;" the film, perhaps, fails to mention the real wolves of the story: the Belgians who judged an orphan by events out of her control and taught her to lie to avoid public humiliation.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One Day (2011)
7/10
Interesting and well-acted
18 December 2021
The two leads are often charming in an interesting romantic movie. Anne Hathaway is seamless in her role, and I loved the '90s fashions on the male lead. The film can be a bit heavy-handed at times (her job as a teacher is morally "good" while his job introducing music videos is morally "bad") but it hits all the right notes for a movie romance.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beautiful and bizarre
22 September 2021
The film begins with a wedding. The petite bride sings a strange pop song through green lipstick, her pearl tiara over her face like a cage. Her corseted dress has furry puffed sleeves. The mannequin-like crowd can't get enough of the show. Later, in a boudoir scene, the bride is swathed by more maribou feathers than Mae West ever wore in her life, and a strange Germanic groom marvels: "The treatment worked so well! It's like that girl never existed!"

We flash back to "the treatment" which occurs in an island environment that is beautiful and artificial. It's a lush paradise filled with flowers and tulle that looks like Princess Diana, George Michael and a deranged Victorian woman designed it. The uniform of the patients, the bride played by Emma Roberts, a girl with a Southern accent, and Awkwafina, includes a neck ruff, puffed sleeves, tulle, white Victorian boots, and BDSM buckles. The orderlies are handsome square jawed young men in origami buckled white outfits. The treatments are all very calm, yoga type things, and the bride, Uma, reveals she is an "upper" in love with a "lower" named Marcus and that her mother wants her to marry an upper she despises. Uma also meets a troubled pop star and discovers secrets about her surroundings.

The film may be a deranged music video, but Awkwafina delivers more energy in her performance than most of her contemporaries combined. I think it's worth seeing for the costumes and sets and the acting. The plot may have serious loopholes, but that's not really the point. Sit back and enjoy the futuristic visuals. Maybe the Renaissance neck ruff will make a fashion comeback, who knows?
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hilarious camp!
8 September 2021
"We must take a stand against...racism!" Harry says in the movie. Although I agree with the sentiment, the line is so heavy handed that I was surprised that the strains of "Glory, Glory, Hallelujah!" weren't rising to a crescendo in the background. To be sure, there is some truth in the narrative presented by this movie: Harry and Meghan were unhappy in England and cruel things about them were printed in media. But, Prince William's endless rolling of the eyes in contempt of Meghan Markle's presence remind me of Jafar in Disney's Aladdin. Prince Charles resembles a befuddled character actor from an old Frank Capra movie, and if he does remember anything, his face immediately sours into an expression as if he popped a lemon candy into his mouth. The actor doesn't look much like Prince Charles, so I didn't know who he was supposed to be until Harry called him Dad. I can't believe we don't get to see an evil version of Camilla, but she is MIA, replaced with a Cruella sort of press secretary/ house manager person. Kate Middleton here seems like a Stepford wife under evil William's control. The only nice member of "the firm" is Harry's house manager who constantly battles William's Cruella lady.

There's an entertainment value here in viewing the story in a different way than what most angry YouTubers would have us believe and in the over-the-top villainous characters who attempt to harm Harry and Meghan. Although the film tells the story in a kooky Lifetime movie way, I'm left with the question: why does Meghan Markle inspire such animosity? It's as if a world that asks women only to attain physical beauty and men only to obtain money must then punish anyone who succeeds in these endeavors as narcissistic for doing what they've been encouraged to do. Maybe it's like the mirror in the British Vogue cover Meghan Markle labors over in the movie; society can't stand to see its own reflection.
13 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Seventh Day (I) (2021)
8/10
a good exorcism movie
11 August 2021
I'm a big Guy Pearce fan so I gave the movie a chance. The opening scene with the great Keith David was a wonderful set piece, but the rest of the movie sometimes disappoints. The movie won points for use of an old Crown Victoria, similar to the car the Mark Gordon drove with the Angel Jonathan Smith in the old TV show Highway to Heaven.

I thought the actor playing Father Daniel gave a layered performance, even his hesitancy and wooden demeanor in the beginning reminds me of actual young priests I have met as a Catholic. I also think the movie did a fine job of showing that although the Catholic Church has committed many grievous crimes, especially sexual abuse, there are still good priests.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Glaring omissions?
5 August 2021
This documentary is so worth watching; it brought the poem Howl into my consciousness and led me to read The Power Broker by Robert Caro after listening to the narrative of a city being destroyed by a crazed park planner with absolute power.

But I can't help mentioning the documentary's omissions. There is no mention of Coney Island in its heyday of the 1890's. It was literally the Disneyland of its day and the first mass amusement park. And there is little discussion of Broadway, fashion, Tin Pan Alley songwriters, or much of anything cultural at all. What about Vaudeville, the Ritz Brothers, Simon and Garfunkel from Queens, or the band KISS, also from Queens? And no mention of the mafia?? Or movies like The Godfather? Or fashion? I'm so interested to know why some of these omissions occurred. Did certain members of "The Mothers and Fathers Italian Association" make PBS "an offer they couldn't refuse?"
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Mixed feelings
11 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The Godfather is not only a classic, it is a masterpiece. I love the character actors and lines like "Leave the gun. Take the cannoli." Marlon Brando, James Caan and Al Pacino deliver some of the greatest performances in cinematic history. The Godfather II continued the momentum and the acclaim of the first film, an amazing feat. And, yet, I do not love the film as much.

I have read both the novel The Godfather and Mario Puzo's first work, The Fortunate Pilgrim. His soaring poetic prose grounded in family relationships in The Fortunate Pilgrim are impressive and lay the groundwork for The Godfather. His depiction of mental illness overtaking a teenager's life has haunted me. Puzo has prosaic skills that many contemporary authors could not match. Stephen King or Dean Koontz, for example, could never produce a sentence with the poetry of The Fortunate Pilgrim. Here is an excerpt by Mario Puzo: " He cantered through the hot summer night, his desert a city of stone. Women gossiped on wooden boxes, men puffed cigars of the De Nobili while standing on street corners, children risked their lives in dangerous play, leaving their blue-slate islands to climb on the moving freight train. All moved in the smoky yellow light of lamp posts and the naked white-hot bulbs of candy-store windows. At every intersection a fresh breeze from Twelfth Avenue, concrete bank of the Hudson River, refreshed horse and rider, cooled the hot black engine that gave warning hoots behind them."

Yet, Coppola has spoken of Puzo as "a collaborator," even detailing how he took plot points (Kay's abortion) from Talia Shire, his sister, rather than from Puzo! (Source: Indiewire) Puzo did not want Michael to murder his brother, but Coppola wanted to show how Michael was becoming a monster.

And Fredo is my problem with the movie. It's a journey I never wanted. Cazale's performance is too good, rendering a character so loathsome that I cheered when he died. Why Fredo? Why Cuba? Why De Niro flashbacks to the early 1900s? All of this is done in a perfect cinematic way with top notch actors, yet I wonder about the choices and a movie that could have been even greater if different ones were made. In light of The Godfather III, I began to wonder if Coppola was trying to repeat his winning formula on Patton: one megalomaniac star takes over the film. Did Coppola's vision favor Al Pacino's Michael so much that Puzo's Corleone family suffers for it? I love the moment where Michael offers a "Judas kiss" to Fredo before saying: I knew it was you Fredo. You broke my heart." But is this the moment Al Pacino ceases to be Michael from the first film, becoming the over the top Al Pacino of Scarface?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I needed to see this...
16 April 2020
As a former psychiatric patient who ultimately chose talk therapy over medication, it's important for me to understand that psychiatric drugs are often necessary and therapeutic. I'm not sure, however, that the average viewer fully understands how traumatic psychiatric treatment can be, or the deleterious side effects of the antipsychotic drug therapies that were part of Linda's treatment.

It is heartbreaking how the stress of work, being a single mother, and the fraying of family relationships due to paranoia from Linda's illness all contributed to a loss of functionality and a downward spiral, as the documentary portrays. I do feel compassion for Linda's sister and friends and the owner's of the house where Linda starved to death, unknown to them.

The average viewer may not see God in the tragic story, but I'm not sure He wasn't with Linda. You see, she was losing touch with reality and couldn't deal with the treatment her illness would require. An abandoned house must have seemed the only option. But, something prevented her from harming others. Even her imaginary husband, Steve, was perhaps a reminder of love and family, perhaps because she had seen him being part of a loving couple at the Chinese restaurant while she was waitressing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Greed (1924)
9/10
Masterful work
5 December 2019
I read Frank Norris's novel MacTeague as a teenager after finding it randomly in a used bookstore. It is unusual, fast paced, and Frank Norris writes in a vivid, journalistic style somewhat reminiscent of Jack London and Theodore Dreiser. The strange, deranged marriage of MacTeague is compelling stuff, but the author intrudes too often to remind the reader that social Darwinism makes the world better, and that the problem of poverty can't be solved by winning the lottery. The message is terrible, even immoral in my opinion, but I can understand why Erich von Stroheim was so intrigued by the hypnotic novel.

After watching Erich von Stroheim in Sunset Boulevard with Gloria Swanson, I became fascinated by his long, storied career. I saw Greed many years ago on TCM and it is indescribable, dream like, and unforgettable. I'd like to watch the film in it's entirety someday.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Malicious (2018)
6/10
Interesting Horror Film
20 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
As a fan of the Insidious films, I often joke that someone in Hollywood opens a thesaurus every year, looks up synonyms for "evil," and then makes a movie around the randomly chosen word. A few classic horror set pieces litter the canvas of Malicious: we have the overhead shot of the car moving towards the family's new dwelling, like in The Shining, creepy portraits that move, and an old woman entity that seemingly re-enacts a bathroom scene from The Shining. However, the results yield an uneasy mishmash rather than a confident narrative.

Critics have torn this film apart in some reviews I've read, but I'm a bit fascinated by the possible subtext of "dangerous femininity." The titular Malicious entity escapes from a "fertility box" given by the blond, thin heroine's provocative sister. Although Lisa is seemingly the perfect traditional homemaker, focused on preparing and cleaning her new home, she insists on jogging late in her pregnancy, alone and in new and unknown surroundings, wearing appropriate but rather revealing attire. Many of these behaviors are perhaps unsafe and a bit controversial, given the possible threat of encountering strangers or endangering the pregnancy (she lies to her husband and said she would walk in the previous scene.) This scene seems significant because it precedes her first supernatural encounter.

I will avoid spoilers here, but the Entity is very female, escapes from a fertility box, and responds to the query "How do I get you back in the box?" with "you don't." Is the film posturing that dangerous femininity is now out of the box? The husband, named Adam, perhaps as a reference to the first Biblical man, often occupies morally transgressive areas of action, and the final scene in a prison puts a troubling, chuckling buddy scene after he has committed, although for noble reasons, a great transgression.

The film may stumble and offer little competition for more competent and thrilling James Wan horror films, but it raises unease and asks interesting gender questions. Its set pieces and jump scares wilt a bit, sort of like a great dancer doing a tired routine out of boredom, but the dancer still deserves an audience.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed