Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Nothing happens in the East German provinces, and hasn't since 1945
23 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The setting is a small town in rural East Germany in the 1970s. It is the dead of winter. A stranger arrives in town. His is dressed like an absurd parody of Inspector Clouseau, speaks in off-putting enigmatic sentences, intrudes in people's business, and doesn't state his true purpose until rather late in the film. (He's an antiques dealer from Berlin,) But his name is "Gwissen," which would literally translate as "Cnscience," and he acts as a sort of catalyst in the tradition of an old-time morality play.

As Gwissen is walking down the street, an old house collapses out the blue. (Oblique criticism of the regime for not taking care of old buildings while building new ones?) For no discernible reason, he wanders into the rubble and reemerges with a book. The dedication reads, "From Jadup to Boel." Who are Jadup and Boel? The viewer finds out in a series of disjointed, (literally) hazy flashback scenes.

In 1945, Boel Marin was an illiterate, simple-minded, teenage refugee girl who arrived in town with her mother. It is never explained why or where they are from, despite their thick Slavic accents. Jadup was a pro-communist teenager who lived secluded in the town's church tower. They vaguely become friends. At some point, Boel is raped, refuses to say who did it, and disappears forever from town, even though her mother stays on. There are rumors that a Soviet soldier did it, though the crime is never solved.

30+ years later, the discovery of the book reawakens the townspeople's memories since it seems that nothing else has happened in this town. Jadup is now the mayor, and suddenly rumors are circulating that he raped the girl and made her disappear. Throughout the film, Jadup makes half-hearted attempts to find Boel to ask her, once more, what really happened. That's basically it. There is no resolution. There is no progression of the plot. The viewer sees various incidents in the town's daily life (incl. a meeting of the high school history club, the opening of a supermarket, a youth initiation ceremony), many of which simply end up oddly thanks to Jadup's incoherence and growing obsession with the past.

This movie was extremely disappointing. The pacing is glacially slow. The screenplay is horrendous, the cinematography is not very good, and the flashback scenes are almost amateurish. The character Gwissen is beyond strange. Other main characters in the movie include the mayor's put-out and embarrassed wife Barbara; their son Max, who just wants to be a teen; the town beauty teenage Eva, who is a nitwit; Willi Unger, a friend of the mayor and a buffoon who is publicly obsessed about writing the history of the town but doesn't know what to say; and Edith Unger, Max's classmate who is, frankly, creepy, and is a sort of "tween" Cassandra with all the social graces of "Carrie." This movie is famous because it was banned by the GDR authorities, probably because of the allegation of Soviet rape of Germans and because the film's low-level communist officials don't take popular democracy seriously. But I don't think that East Germans were missing much by not watching this movie.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A brilliant depiction of East Germany's final years
22 September 2009
"The Architects" is a brilliant depiction of life in the final years of East Germany's existence. Intellectuals who are on the verge of middle age are stagnating professionally and suffocating intellectually. They can't talk freely; they can't think freely. They have a burning desire to reform and to improve their little socialist country, but obstacles are everywhere. An older, inflexible generation holds on while paying mere lip-service to youth, progress, and innovation. What will happen? Is change possible?

At 38 years of age, Daniel Brenner is a no-longer-young architect looking for his first big break. One of his former professors decides to help him out and introduces Daniel to an older architect who is now a city-planning administrator and Communist Party official. Daniel is asked to put together a team of "young" architects to enter a competition to design a town center. A team of handpicked architects whom he knew in his college days, they propose a center complete with a post office, grocery story, restaurants, cinema, theater, bowling alley, art gallery, and monuments, all situated in architecture that is innovative for East Germany. It signals a fresh start and a new responsiveness.

But here is where Daniel's problems begin. The very officials who appointed him are resistant to change. The proposal is too expensive, too difficult to build, too innovative, too intellectually honest, too everything. Daniel tries to win them over, but can he make a difference? Meanwhile, members of his team are losing faith in him and in the system. Even worse, as he gives everything to push for the proposal, his personal life is falling apart around him. His wife is bored with the monotony of life in East Germany and resentful about the lost chances in her life. Will Daniel have any achievements in his life, or will he be a professional failure, divorced, and trapped in country that doesn't want his input?

This movie was filmed in and around East Berlin in 1989 and 1990. The scenery is stark and accurate. This movie had the bad fortune to be released as East Germany was falling apart and reunification was underway. Audiences no longer cared to dwell on how stultifying East Germany had been. They wanted to look forward. But 20+ years later, this film is a moving and accurate depiction of what life was like for ordinary, educated people slowly being crushed by The System.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Melodramatic tripe
12 April 2009
A young, impoverished, passionate left-wing Irish student at Cambridge University, Guy Malyon (Stuart Townsend) falls in love with a happy-go-lucky, American-born socialite Gilda Bessé (Charlize Theron). Maylon follows her to 1930s Paris, where she is a professional photographer and where she lives with a Spanish-born nurse named Mia (Penélope Cruz). Maylon and Bessé cohabitate and work together. Inflamed by the injustice of the fascist Falange in the Spanish War, Mia and Maylon leave Paris to fight in the Spanish Civil War. Maylon eventually returns to Paris; he later fights in World War II; and he constantly longs for Bessé.

Somewhere, someone commented that this film could have had the tagline, "How world events can mess with your love life." That pretty much sums it up. Maylon wants to be with Bessé, but the great struggle against fascism keeps derailing their relationship. Frankly, the script is ridiculous. In fact, the whole storyline is completely overdone and melodramatic. It seems very contrived. It is as if the screenwriter wanted to tell an epic, dramatic love story against the political events of Europe 1934-1944, but this film doesn't have the heft. It's no "Dr. Zhivago." Additionally, the acting is fairly awful and over-dramatic. I can't believe that two Oscar-worthy actresses needed to act in a movie as absurd as this one. There is nothing subtle about the script that would befit their great acting talents.

After seeing this film on cable television, I was so disappointed that I was moved to write the foregoing comment. I would recommend avoiding this film.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed