Change Your Image
svenskaflicka90210
Reviews
Zeitgeist (2007)
Lacks hard evidence, just speculations = waste of time
Many of my friends have told me to go watch this internet-documentary called "zeitgeist". Knowing my atheist-views, they thought i would love it.
So i watched it. But I'm not impressed. Where are the evidence? Seriously, all the books and sources that are mentioned are authors that quote each other. And most other sources are internet-sources. The sources for this movie is whether you like it or not not that creditable. There are NO unbiased sources for this movie.
It is just like the documentary "Chariot of The Gods", a documentary (and book) that states that Aliens started human civilization. If you watch it and accept all statements, facts and sources given to you in that movie blindly, then you start believing that aliens did start human civilization. But a further critical look at "Chariots of The Gods" revealed that it is only a fairy-tale. It has no real evidence of its grand claims - no smoking gun.
And the same is the problem with Zeitgeist. It is a biased and poorly made "documentary". Just because some anti-religious people want there to be an evil conspiracy behind all religions doesn't make it true. Zeitgeist is a fun piece of fiction. But that is all it is. It has, whether you like it or not, no hard evidence. It is simply just speculations and questionable sources.
The manuscript and allegations of Zeitgeist would never make it to be a paper on a real university (those mail-order universities, where all conspiracy theorists get their degrees from are not respectable or real universities).
The allegations of Zeitgeist can turn out to be true, in the long run. But until this day they have no hard evidence of their claims - they lack the smoking-gun kind of evidence. Therefore people should not take this poor documentary seriously, until hard and unquestionable evidence have been found.
But until that day i will laugh at people who believe in this so-called "documentary", just as i laugh at the idea of God.
Loose Change: Second Edition (2005)
Conspiracy theorists don't know what they are talking about
This poorly made documentary tries to convince people that CIA somehow planned 9/11, because they wanted a war on terror. At first it sounds like a fantastic plan for a fictional movie, but people actually believes in it - almost like a religion.
Since its release, all the facts have been disputed, and even the creators of this "documentary" admits that it is full of flaws. But they don't care if they have evidence of their claims or not, as long as USA is responsible for 9/11, then they are happy.
But why don't any of these conspiracy theorists think for just 1 minute? If the CIA planned 9/11, to make the war on terror, then the Arabs must have been patsies. But then why was the Arabs from Saudi Arabia???? If the CIA and American Government is so powerful as the Conspiracy Theorists claim, then they made the Arabs come to America to be in the Planes. But then why from Saudi Arabia, if USA after-wards waged war against Afghanistan and Iraq?? If the CIA was so powerful as the conspiracy theorists claim, then they would made Iraqies and Afghans go into those planes, because then they would have a greater argument to attack the Arab-countries in the so-called war on terror, especially Iraq.
The problem is that it is not a concern of the conspiracy theorists. Because it is religion to them. They WANT the Americans to be responsible for every major event in history. They want to see CIA pulling the strings.
The typical Conspiracy theorists, when working on a conspiracy theory, starts with the conclusion, and then works from there, choosing the evidence that can fit the theory and discarding and ignoring all facts and evidence that contradicts the overall theory.
Also all the facts of this film have been debunked: www.911myths.com
The worst part of the film is when Dylan Avery claims that the families of the victims of United 93 didn't talk to the passengers on the plane. No, Avery claims that they talked to CIA-agents, who used voice-reconstruction-technology, to make it seem that there where a struggle on the plane. The technology in question is just a new technology, that CANT be used live, it has to be used on a recording, and even then it is not 100 % accurate. Also different people have different way of speaking, not only accents and voice, but also how they react, humor, way of talking and so on, which technology cant imitate. Also if they copied their voices, then they must have had all these many passengers, all of them mind you, under surveillance for months. And also many of the people that where on the plane didn't even decide to board the plane until few days before. You conspiracy theorists aren't using your mind.
And then think of how complex this plan is: monitoring hundreds of people, making sure that none of the thousands of pilots, airport-personal, CIA, NSA, FBI, Policemen, firemen and citizens didn't talk. Making sure this voice-reconstruction-technology worked. Killing all the people on United 93, by many military-men, who had no moral problems with it. Don't you get it? If just one of these factors didn't work, then the whole operation fell?? And people would know the truth. Which heavily implies that there WAS NO CONSPIRACY.
Terrorstorm (2006)
Look away from the speculations, and think logically
This documentary tries to prove that some secret society with the help of CIA was responsible for the terrorist-acts of 9/11 (USA), 3/11 (Spain) and 7/7 (UK).
At first a paranoid fantasy, but if you actually watch the documentary, you at first believe it. But if you stop it after-wards, think of what happened, look at the current political atmosphere all around the world, then you know that this "documentary" is all lies.
I've checked the facts, some fit, but most are exaggerated, or direct lies. This is a political motivated documentary, based on a conspiracy theory and a way of thinking that says that Americans and CIA are responsible for every bad thing that has ever happened in the world in all of human history.
If the Spanish Government had planned it, then they would not have blamed it on ETA! They would not have lost the election 3 days after, and the Spanish troops would never have been withdrawn from Iraq. Please grow a brain and shot it out with a shotgun.
Look here: www.911myths.com all the conspiracy theories about 9/11 have been debunked.
I mean it. If the Spanish government had planed 3/11 then they would not immediately blame it on ETA. If they would have wanted to inspire fear in the population to motivate them to kill Iraqis or get more surveillance, then they would have blamed it on Al-Quada, but they didn't.
The conspiracy theorists says: that Bush somehow singlehandedly planned the most excellent military mission inside USA (9/11), without anyone knowing it was him, and yet he cannot plant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to justify the war on terror.
If the American government somehow planned all this, then think about how many people should have been involved, just to make sure that the public didn't know anything: all of CIA, NSA, FBI, 3 levels of governments, 1000 of policemen, firemen, airport-personnel, pilots, passengers and their families, and all the worlds media, should be in this conspiracy to prevent the public from knowing.
It is true, that CIA did train and give weapons and money to Al-Quada and Taliban. But that was because they had a common enemy: THE RUSSIANS, in Afghanistan. Common enemy, makes allies. Just as in WW2 when Russia, UK and USA were allies over the common enemy: Germany. But after-wards they became enemies too.
Also Germany and Russia were allies prior to WW2. A non-aggression pact. They were allies, who attacked, sacked and raped Poland together, because they had planned it. They had a common target: little defenseless Poland. But then Germany Attacked Russia. So if we follow the Conspiracy theory-logic and rhetoric, then this was all planned by Stalin and Hitler according to a Illuminati-plan
But i am glad that there are only 2 or 3 people that love this movie. Though they want to give the impression that there are many. You can see that in the people that have commented this film. Users like: bmallard-2, d386, mrda-1, safe_withmee and kurt-252. Look at them; all their comments sound alike and look alike. All their user names are very similar. And most important: they have all, only, commented one movie: Terrorstorm.
That is because it is only ONE person. One pathetic person, trying to make it seem that there are many that supports and believes in this fictional documentary. Get a life conspiracy theorists, get a life.
Navy Seals (1990)
Top Gun on the ground
I can't believe why some people hate this movie that much? I really can't.
It is Very entertaining. And it is very action-packed-pewee.
But all the feminist also shall have some masculine movie to hate, I think it is this one.
Why can't you love this action-packed piece of work. Yes, it is not 100 % realistic. BUT IT IS A MOVIE.
But in these terror-times this movie gets even better.
I will call it "Top Gun" on the ground - for it is that, which it is. It is made at the same time (80ties). And it is about a small team of guys, doing Americas work against the evil elements.
It is very entertaining. Don't miss it.
WonderBoy V Monster World III (1991)
Very good commodore 64 game
This was one of the games I wasted my time on back in the 80ties.
Back in the 80ties I used to play a lot on my commodore 64. And among the commodore 64 games, this game is one of the best.
Wonderboy in monster land was different, because it more role playing elements and action, but in a arcade way. It was very different than the big successes like Bubble Bobble and Giana sister's which only was about going from a to b and beating up monsters.
In this game the scenario was varied, and there were shops were you could by swords and get riddles. There were taverns were you could get advise.
This was a very big success on many computer-types. But i remembered it on my commodore 64.
Those were the days..........
The thing about the game that is clearest in my mind is the music - what a classic.
Man i love this game, and so must many people in the world.
Erinnerungen an die Zukunft (1970)
An important documentary
This is an important documentary, because it criticizes all the established theories. When I first saw it, i really first believed in it. Now I don't do it 100 %. But it made me think. It is a very bias documentary, but some of the point are good. Why where there maps that depicted the south pole under the ice in th 16th century?? That is a good question, which the established science have ignored. The south pole was first discovered and mapped in the 18th or 19th century. This documentary suggests that Aliens came down to earth and taught us many things. That is not my theory. My theory is that the human race was much more advanced once, before the last ice age. We know that the poles can shift, and that it has happened. Plus before the last ice age (20.000 - 25.ooo years ago) there were a lot warmer, plus they have found millions of years old bones of dinosaurs there. I think that an advanced human civilization once lived on the south pole. That explained a lot: we have a 16th century map of the pole under the ice, because the map from the ancient civilization was copied and copied again, from generation of learned people to the next. There a pyramids in Egypt, South America and somewhere in south east Asia. This explained that the once advanced human population of the south pole fled to the whole world after the ice age ruined their homelands, and they took their culture with them. All the depictions of gods, which are wearing helmets and breathing apparatus, are all because the advanced human race visited the primitive ones long ago. The advanced culture of humans explained the pyramids, all ancient cities, The sphinx (which has marks of irrigation on its back, which hints that it is as old as the recent wet-period in Egypt, which lies 25.000 - 35.000 years in the past, which is much older than it is acknowledged), how the pyramids were build, Balbeck in Lebanon, easter island and many other big ruins around the world. There is generally a feeling that people in the past were dumb - they were not. Just because they were not born in Europa or USA does not make people inferior. It is arrogantly of us in the west to assume the we invented everything first, and that advanced civilization started in the west.
This documentaries makes people think - and that is good.
An Evening with Kevin Smith (2002)
Funny as hell
Kevin Smith is a genius. He is intelligent, creative and practically a stand-up comedian.
This 4-hour long show is really good and funny - but only if you are a fan of his movies.
Smith is so good at ridiculing people like Tim Burton and John Peters.
Though Burton is a good director, you could not help but laugh at him.
Smith makes fun of people in a very funny and intelligent way.
The show gives you an insight into the world of Kevin Smith. Kevin Smith is both funny and vulgar, in a informative way.
Don't miss this show for anything in the world.
It is also very popular outside USA, and that tells you how good it is.
Kurtlar Vadisi: Irak (2006)
Turkish Hypocrisy
This film is a big testament to Turkish Hypocrisy. Much of the Turkish population believe in the lies of this movie, and accuse USA of atrocities though the Turks should look back at themselves and see that they themselves once was bigger war criminals. In 1915-16 the Turks murdered and moved hundreds of thousands of innocent Armenians. Some estimates in UN, many years later, set the numbers of dead Armenians as high as 1.000.000, or maybe even more. Up towards the First World War there were a lot of tension between the Turkish government and the Armenian population in the North and the East. And when the war came, they had their chance to commit genocide, and they did so. It is a historical fact TURKS: ACCEPT IT. And also the Turks have for decades treated the Kurdish population VERY poorly. They have imprisoned people that think independent Kurdish thoughts. And also once, a member of their parliament was imprisoned for just for speaking the Kurdish language in the parliament. What a police-state, if you ask me. Turkey: admit your gilt, and beg forgiveness from the Armenians and the Kurds. And now has this arrogant nation with innocent blood on its hands made wrongful film, which accuse USA of doing war-crimes, when Turkey, in fact, is one the few countries in the world who never have been accounted for its crimes. The whole part of the Jewish-American doctor who kill and torture innocent Arabs, because he wants to sell their organs is ludicrous. It only speaks of the intellectual level in Turkey nothing more.
Don't watch this film, it is simply awful.
1 out of 10 end of story.
Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State (2005)
The MOST bias "documentary" ever made
Then I finally came around to see this "documentary" called "Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State". The title intrigued me, I thought it was a political thriller I was wrong, it was a "documentary". I must say: how wrong can you get? This "documentary" turns every fact and every shred of reality on it head. It has nothing to do with reality. Actually I shortly, for about two seconds, believed in this documentary. But the lack of truth, evidence and intelligence quickly convinced me otherwise. I showed the "documentary" to my friends, and neither of them believed in it, it was just too poorly made and too outrageous. All of my friends laughed at it and thought it was stupid, and so do I. I amazed that the so-called "director" (I'm not even mentioning his name; he doesn't deserve it) can legally spread all these obvious lies upon lies! The "director" totally ignores all facts and all evidence, and then creates his own because he does in fact not use reel TV-footage, though he says so, everybody with just half a brain can see that the so-called footage have been made in the "directors" own garage. He lies, and I can't believe that he is getting away with it; accusing people of this and that. But what can we do? That is the price of freedom. That is the freedom of press and speech. Everybody can make fiction in their own garage. But maybe I should look at it in another light: It is good that even the handicapped people can make documentaries (fiction) to other handicapped that is actually quite sweet. But the worst thing is: the "director" still claims that his "documentary" in fact is a "documentary" even though it is not, every intelligent person can see that it is not. This "documentary" is so obvious fake and that I am glad for. You can see in the credits that the "director" has made most of the movie, and have provided most of the sources (READ BETWEEN THE LINES: he fabricated all the footage. That is actually a well-known fact). Everybody who can't see that this "documentary" is fake, should not be allowed to speak his voice, because he must be very unintelligent, but freedom of speech gives all people (even the handicapped) the right to speak his or her voice. There is absolutely no evidence nor brains in this "documentary" therefore: don't watch this.
Just because some guy put it into to a documentary, dose not automatically make it right (think about Fahrenhype 9/11, Triumph Of The Will, Michael Moore hates America, Der Ewige Jude, Fahrenheit 9/11 and Chariots of the Gods).
Just don't watch it: it will not bring you any good.