3/10
So bad it's worth seeing (maybe).
24 June 2002
This picture is so terrible that it may actually become an underground cult classic! It can't be judged by normal-movie standards; it has to be seen as a "grab-the-camera-and-start-filming-random-events" kind of experiment - and it fails even as that. Technically, this is the worst movie I've seen since Andy Warhol's "Trash", but "Trash" had Paul Morrissey to redeem it, this has nothing (apart from its short length). (*)
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed