Since the director Michael Moore made Fahrenheit 9/11 as a political propaganda to have George W. Bush lose in the 2004 U.S. presidential election, regardless of its result, the main role of the film is over once the election was done. Though Bush won and the film's objective was unfulfilled, it had certainly produced notable effects during the election campaign; many on both sides must have learned about Bush's history from the film. Hats off to Moore, for that matter.
Now after the election, what values does the film have? , Moore's almost primitive techniques of manipulation, mostly on editing, which might be installed to make the best impact on the U.S. entire population, could be an obstacle for the film to be an objectively documented masterpiece. In the future, the film may be likely viewed as a satirical or even cartoonish documentary that chronicles these bizarre four years under the Bush administration, from Bush's tricky victory in the 2000 election to 9/11 to the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars.
Now after the election, what values does the film have? , Moore's almost primitive techniques of manipulation, mostly on editing, which might be installed to make the best impact on the U.S. entire population, could be an obstacle for the film to be an objectively documented masterpiece. In the future, the film may be likely viewed as a satirical or even cartoonish documentary that chronicles these bizarre four years under the Bush administration, from Bush's tricky victory in the 2000 election to 9/11 to the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars.