i have watched both the 1990 and 1963 version of lord of the flies and i think that the 1963 version is nothing like the newer version. comments about the 1963 version say that is it child porn, i think not. yes there are a few scenes where you can see 2 boys asses and a penis but i don't think that that would be classed as child porn, i went on the net the other day and did some research and i found some pictures, the pictures were showing more nudity then the film was. does anyone no what rules the boys broke whilst on the island? i think that the newer version could have been a bit more longer and that the producer should have followed the first movie.
Review of Lord of the Flies
