2/10
Horror Classic or Mastebatory material for 13 yr. old boys??
12 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Before my rediscovery of this movie at the age 16 I had only remembered small snippets of the film from my childhood. Impressions of the film, based solely on my childhood memories, would leave one to perceive the film as a high paced action/horror film, but that is what would happen if a person was to describe a film based off of assertions that they had made as a child. In actuality this film just barely stays out of the realm of soft core pornography. Yes, this film is one of few that can boast undead orgies and a Werewolf/ Hybrid/semi-human form Menage twa.

Thinking back I can now understand why snippets were all I could remember. Either my parents never let a child of the ripe age of four or five finish watching this movie, or they spent most of the 80 or 90 minutes of run time shielding my virgin eyes of cheesy 80's semi- soft core porn. Not even Christopher Lee, one of the grandmasters of the horror genre, could pull this movie up from the metaphorical street corner that it works.

Terrible acting, an even worse story line and plot inconsistencies leave much of this films redeeming value in it's strong sexual content and nudity, which if you're over the age 18 and can purchase actual adult films, or are capable of picking up a girl and experiencing the real thing, leaves little reason to watch this film.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed