This movie is entirely devoted to praising the irresponsible, anarchical, criminal, over-privileged, fascist young idiots of the 1960's, which is perfectly acceptable and the right of every Americans.
There is one moment, however, where this movie reveals an incredible degree of narrow- mindedness and intellectual dishonesty. During one of the rare times they mention Ronald Reagan (who, once again, is revealed to be the best politician ever), they strongly implied that his actions were motivated by ulterior, selfish motives (he criticized the irresponsible, anarchical, criminal, over-privileged, fascist young idiots purely "to please the crow to be elected Governor", according to the narrator).
How come the idea that MAYBE, SOME of the irresponsible, anarchical, criminal, over-privileged, fascist young idiots MIGHT have been, at least PARTIALLY, motivated by ulterior, selfish, or hypocritical motives is NOT ONCE proposed ? How come the fascist authors of this movie are immediately prone to arrogantly decree that anyone who disagrees with them can not sincerely believe in what he or she says ?
There is one moment, however, where this movie reveals an incredible degree of narrow- mindedness and intellectual dishonesty. During one of the rare times they mention Ronald Reagan (who, once again, is revealed to be the best politician ever), they strongly implied that his actions were motivated by ulterior, selfish motives (he criticized the irresponsible, anarchical, criminal, over-privileged, fascist young idiots purely "to please the crow to be elected Governor", according to the narrator).
How come the idea that MAYBE, SOME of the irresponsible, anarchical, criminal, over-privileged, fascist young idiots MIGHT have been, at least PARTIALLY, motivated by ulterior, selfish, or hypocritical motives is NOT ONCE proposed ? How come the fascist authors of this movie are immediately prone to arrogantly decree that anyone who disagrees with them can not sincerely believe in what he or she says ?