Pathology might have been an interesting movie if they hadn't evidently chopped out much of the exposition.
Milo Ventimiglia arrives as intern at NY city pathologists office, discovering all but one of his fellow interns are psychos, bullies and junkies. Understandably, he doesn't want anything to do with them. Then, suddenly, he's joined the gang, and is vying with their chief psycho to out-gross them all, while conducting a steamy affair with a woman in whom he has previously shown no interest whatsoever.
It's like the producers thought they'd just like to get to the sex and blood, and the subject matter and story were getting in the way. They've made a film that purports to explore the further shores of moral jeopardy, but actually hasn't the faintest idea of its own ethical parameters.
What is really morally objectionable is that MGM has released a film that makes no sense, has no proper starting point or conclusion, and yet they expect Moviegoers to pay full rate to see this damaged, unfinished, witless and cynical mess.
Milo Ventimiglia arrives as intern at NY city pathologists office, discovering all but one of his fellow interns are psychos, bullies and junkies. Understandably, he doesn't want anything to do with them. Then, suddenly, he's joined the gang, and is vying with their chief psycho to out-gross them all, while conducting a steamy affair with a woman in whom he has previously shown no interest whatsoever.
It's like the producers thought they'd just like to get to the sex and blood, and the subject matter and story were getting in the way. They've made a film that purports to explore the further shores of moral jeopardy, but actually hasn't the faintest idea of its own ethical parameters.
What is really morally objectionable is that MGM has released a film that makes no sense, has no proper starting point or conclusion, and yet they expect Moviegoers to pay full rate to see this damaged, unfinished, witless and cynical mess.