First of all, the last thing Call of Duty players wanted was a 3rd futuristic game in a row in the Call of Duty series. So let's start the review.
Lets start with the campaign. It's VERY predicable, and has been seen so many times before (especially in Call of Duty). The cool characters(Cormack and Irons) die, while leaving the un-interesting, boring characters for the un-wanted sequel. The campaign is also more of the same, you follow an ally, shoot up the room, then follow him to another room and do the same. Overall, The campaign is like Black ops 2's campaign, but with lame characters, lame missions, and an awful story at best.
Now let's talk about the multi-player. It feels like ever since Modern Warfare 2, they like to use the same formula, but implement in worse every time. A lot of the maps such as Defender, Greenband, Recovery, Solar, and Terrace don't even rely on map design, considering that people just jump over all of the buildings, hallways, entrances etc. It's more of the same, but done a lot worse.
Lets start with the campaign. It's VERY predicable, and has been seen so many times before (especially in Call of Duty). The cool characters(Cormack and Irons) die, while leaving the un-interesting, boring characters for the un-wanted sequel. The campaign is also more of the same, you follow an ally, shoot up the room, then follow him to another room and do the same. Overall, The campaign is like Black ops 2's campaign, but with lame characters, lame missions, and an awful story at best.
Now let's talk about the multi-player. It feels like ever since Modern Warfare 2, they like to use the same formula, but implement in worse every time. A lot of the maps such as Defender, Greenband, Recovery, Solar, and Terrace don't even rely on map design, considering that people just jump over all of the buildings, hallways, entrances etc. It's more of the same, but done a lot worse.