Review of Vertigo

Vertigo (1958)
1/10
Hitchcocks most boring among his "classics"
19 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I love North by Northwest, Birds and Psycho.

But Vertigo is too long and too boring.

The story in it self is interesting enough but it should have been at least half an hour shorter. Especially because the ending (Judy and the Madeleine is the same person) is obvious from the moment he knocks on her door. Also why would they pull off a staged suicide that well and she would be dumb enough to stay in the city in the exact same room? Why didn't they just made it seem like the wife was murdered and frame John for the murder? How can John just leave a place where he's been committed?

And most importantly: why did Hitchcock insist on using crappy studio shots for almost every outdoor location, whenever the actors were talking?? This actually annoyed me so much that I had a hard time concentrating on enjoying the movie!! Even in 1958 those awful background matte paintings must have looked so fake. Or the scene in the forest or by the ocean or the bay where it's all studio shots!! Or the night painting of the city in Midges apartment!! Or every shot of an actor driving with a fake background in the rear window.

It seems profoundly stupid, when they had already shot a lot outside!! I just don't get why???
41 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed