Este es un director que no me llega a transmitir. Pero tengo que admitir que esta película, aun teniendo un tempo, lento, aun explayándose demasiado tiempo en cosas que no hacen falta, nos cuenta la vida del campo entera y no necesitamos saberla, pero la película tiene interés.
Me sobra el principio de la película. Los dos primero años. Se entiende perfectamente sin ellos.
Los actores están estupendos, si no fuese por ellos, la película se caería entera.
La iluminación no es mala, es peor, tiene una fotografía blanca que no me dice nada de nada.
El director, que no gusta como dirige, para mi guste hace una película larga. Vale que el tempo le guste lento, vale, a veces hace falta. Pero que sobren secuencias, es otra cosa. Es especialista en observar con la cámara y a mí eso me parece perder mucha potencia visual.
Pero esta al menos si tiene fuerza.
This is a director who does not transmit to me. But I have to admit that this film, even having a tempo, slow, even expounding too much time on things that are not needed, tells us the life of the whole field and we do not need to know it, but the film has interest.
I have plenty of the beginning of the movie. The first two years. It is perfectly understood without them.
The actors are great, if it were not for them, the film would fall entirely.
The lighting is not bad, it's worse, it has a white photograph that does not tell me anything at all.
The director, who does not like how he directs, for my liking makes a long film. It's okay if the tempo likes slow, okay, sometimes it's necessary. But what about sequences, is another thing. He is a specialist in observing with the camera and to me that seems to lose a lot of visual power.
But this is at least if it has strength
Me sobra el principio de la película. Los dos primero años. Se entiende perfectamente sin ellos.
Los actores están estupendos, si no fuese por ellos, la película se caería entera.
La iluminación no es mala, es peor, tiene una fotografía blanca que no me dice nada de nada.
El director, que no gusta como dirige, para mi guste hace una película larga. Vale que el tempo le guste lento, vale, a veces hace falta. Pero que sobren secuencias, es otra cosa. Es especialista en observar con la cámara y a mí eso me parece perder mucha potencia visual.
Pero esta al menos si tiene fuerza.
This is a director who does not transmit to me. But I have to admit that this film, even having a tempo, slow, even expounding too much time on things that are not needed, tells us the life of the whole field and we do not need to know it, but the film has interest.
I have plenty of the beginning of the movie. The first two years. It is perfectly understood without them.
The actors are great, if it were not for them, the film would fall entirely.
The lighting is not bad, it's worse, it has a white photograph that does not tell me anything at all.
The director, who does not like how he directs, for my liking makes a long film. It's okay if the tempo likes slow, okay, sometimes it's necessary. But what about sequences, is another thing. He is a specialist in observing with the camera and to me that seems to lose a lot of visual power.
But this is at least if it has strength