Trilogy of Terror II (1996 TV Movie)
3/10
Trilogy of Terror II: Did it really need a sequel?
25 March 2019
The gimmick to Trilogy of Terror (1975) was three stories where actress Karen Black would lead them all but playing different characters. Personally I didn't get the logic there and it was a pretty weak anthology.

An astonishing 21 years later a sequel is born and even more astonishing is the fact it has the same creator. Dan Curtis returns to bring us another "Trilogy of terror" and it's no better than the original sadly.

With no Karen Black in sight it tells three stories including giant rats, returning a deceased child from the dead and a sequel to one of the tales from the original movie featuring a killer African doll.

I'm impressed with the commitment, the fact that we have the same creators and that we see a follow up story but none of it is exactly very enjoyable stuff.

The first story is by far the best and reminded me of something Tales from the Crypt (1989) would do. The second was pretty terrible and the third was generic cat and mouse "Action" featuring the African doll from the first movie. The thing looks like the lovechild of Full Moon's Ooga-Booga and a critter!

This sequel simply didn't need to exist and I'm stunned that they didn't even get Karen Black in as a cameo role.

The Good:

Geoffrey Lewis

Same creator as the original

Some loyalty to the first movie

The Bad:

No originality

Un-engaging stuff
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed