6/10
What have they done?!?
25 November 2020
This film is nothing like original. The whole first film was about philosophy. Here the first 1 hour is a very cheesy storyline of getting to the philosophy part. Then we finally get philosophy. It lasts for 20 minutes only and it's almost nothing we haven't learnt in the previous film. When it decides to end with a cliffhanger and an ambiguous ending at the same time. To be honest it could've been much worse. The ending is not too bad and I'm so happy they did not invent something new which would contradict and ruin it as a franchise, at least for now the first film is still as great as it was. Still this sequel is very poor. It has flaws in story, it only has a story to get to the stuff similar to what first film was going about. I'll admit that there are a few things this film did right. It got the same characters played by same actors and some of the ideas for the "upcoming" sequel are pretty good. I believe it's possible to fix the mess with the promised continuation.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed