I have watched every series and generally I do enjoy the show. However last year I was so angry when that idiot won. There were plenty of deserving acts so why did he win? Because judges put him through, he should never have been on the live shows. Is it so we are talking about it? We are but for the wrong reasons. In the days of Diversity and Paul Potts the show was fair no wonder people now call it a fix. Please can a true talent win? We have already seen plenty good enough. There seems to be an unfair rule that there aren't too many singers or too many magicians on each live show well why if they are the best act.
Review of Britain's Got Talent
