Time Flies (1944) Poster

(1944)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
It's OK
AAdaSC4 March 2010
The professor (Felix Aylmer) is showing Susie (Evelyn Dall) around his time machine when it accidentally takes off with Tommy (Tommy Handley) and Bill (George Moon) also on board. They are transported to Elizabethan England where they come across Walter Raleigh, William Shakespeare, Queen Elizabeth 1, Captain John Smith and Pocohontas. Will our time travellers return?

The film has genuinely funny moments, eg, Dall feeding Shakespeare with his lines, and entertaining dialogue, eg, Handley calling someone a "tosspot". However, the film also has tedious sections which drag, eg, the escape sequence at the end where the time machine is on the bonfire. The music sections are pleasant but forgettable and Evelyn Dall comes across as the best character. Watch for an amusing portrayal of Pocohontas from Iris Lang - she can outdrink Oliver Reed. Overall, it's an OK film but it is made in that British silly way where the comedy relies on music-hall style one-liners and you know that no-one is ever in danger of any kind.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Has some bright moments
malcolmgsw15 June 2020
It is curious that 2 time travel films appeared within months of each other.This film and Fiddlers Three.I prefer the later.Though it has to be said that Handley transfers better to film than Trinder.However the script in this film is variable.It was to be the last film of Handley and the last pairing of Marriott and Moffat
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good feeling movie. Good character actors.
bluesboy-118 August 2008
I liked it. It's a cute little movie. Miss Dall was the spark in it that kept it going. The ending could have been better, maybe left open the possibility of other adventures (a sequel or two). Would be nice to make a modern version. Maybe going back or forward to a few different places in time with some chase scenes and twists and turns, like losing one of the characters in an era and then returning to rescue them before an unfortunate event. I'm tired of all the special effect movies now-a-days with no real plot and aren't funny, that are violent and very forgetful. The effects used in the movie were nice considering they were from the forties.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable and witty
emrc79 July 2004
I enjoy this era of British comedy / movies. I can watch these over and over again. How refreshing it is to watch good hearted, clean and witty comedy.

Movies such as - The Ghost of St Michaels, The Black Sheep of Whithall, Bees in Paradise, Good morning Boys, Give us the Moon etc are pure British gems !

I admire the Brits for turning out these now classic movies during the war and post war period, love watching 'em !!! from an Aussie movie admirer with strong British traditions and family ties. Only movies to watch !!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
TIME FLIES (Walter Forde, 1944) ***
Bunuel197621 April 2011
Director Forde was a leading figure in British film-making of the 1930s and 1940s, helming two classic and influential 'engine' thrillers i.e. THE GHOST TRAIN (1931; which is now apparently lost but which he remade 10 years later!) and ROME EXPRESS (1932), as well as star vehicles for many a comedian (such as Jack Hulbert, The Crazy Gang and Arthur Askey). This, then, is the fourth film of his I have checked out (besides owning 15{!} more that are still unwatched) and it follows in the latter vein i.e. starring now-forgotten radio comic Tommy Handley.

The film is chiefly valuable for its deft mish-mash of several genres: for instance, the titular epithet (which turns up so often and so casually in our daily conversation) is approached here on a literal plane by having our four protagonists dodging pursuit by literally taking flight in both space and time via a ball-shaped metal craft! The time machine (invented by distinguished character actor Felix Aylmer) – perhaps the very first of its kind to be seen in movies! – strands its occupants in 16th century England (despite its pedigree, the present-day scenes are supposedly set in New York!) and, as was the case with the same year's similarly-themed FIDDLERS THREE, the heroes try to use the stuff they learned from history-books to their advantage: however, the locals do not take kindly to their prophesying The Great London Fire of 1666 and, even less appreciated are their foretelling of Queen Elizabeth I's perennial spinsterhood and the fact that her family's hated relatives, the Stuarts, will thus succeed her!; incidentally, apart from her, we also get to meet Walter Raleigh (not yet knighted, he is surprised when addressed as such!), William Shakespeare (having trouble writing the love scenes in "Romeo & Juliet", the spirited heroine – who, early on, is surprisingly shown in her underwear – 'suggests' a few of the play's most-quoted lines!) and the famous duo of John Smith (played by the odd-looking Roy Emerton from the same year's Shakespearean adaptation of HENRY V!) and Pocahontas.

However, the film is obviously also a musical comedy (this being still wartime): while the former is first presented conventionally via an on-stage revue number, it is eventually incorporated into the narrative when the protagonists are about to be executed and they buy some time for themselves by bursting into an impromptu performance! As for the comedy, the nominal star is a scoundrel in the Will Hay mould (incidentally, his two frequent sparring partners Moore Marriott and Graham Moffatt also turn up here!); he is best-known for IT'S THAT MAN AGAIN (1942), from the same director, and which was essentially a transcript of his popular radio show – and, even if nowhere near as endearing as Hay, he still manages a reasonable amount of funny quips and, memorably, instigates a scene in which America is claimed in the name of Britain and in the presence of the Queen three times in a row!

When finally going back to the present, the time machine misses the mark by a few hours so that the characters vanish immediately after landing since these were not supposed to be anywhere near the contraption at the appointed time! By the way, another novelty they adopt to astound the people of this by-gone era is a camera which allows their escape from jail by projecting footage of themselves on the walls, and which then has the suspicious guards befuddled by chasing what appears to be mere shadows! Incidentally, though I watched the film as part of my ongoing Easter epic marathon, this aspect comes through mainly in the period evocation rather than with any overt spectacle (even if the whole concept is decidedly elaborate at that)...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Dear Old Pals"
Spondonman28 September 2005
I've always enjoyed this Tommy Handley outing, in the year of grace 1943 he was at the height of his ITMA popularity. It remains a rather bizarre film to have been made during WW2, but of course would have served a purpose as a morale booster as well as being simply simple fun.

In modern Manhattan Tommy sponsors Professor Felix Aylmer's Time Ball, a huge silver ball/ space-time -ship, and eventually they, Evelyn Dall and George Moon end up in Elizabethan England - to absolutely everyone's consternation. They have some hilarious escapades, heavy with deliberate anachronisms, but it's Tommy's film - without his incessant witticisms it would have been a pretty poor show. Sometimes it falls flat, other times it's pure genius at work - at a tense life or death fraught moment he suddenly worries about having left the rice pudding "on". The scene where the four of them escape from prison from under Really Raleigh's nose - and how! - is breathtaking stuff for 1943.

To most people it's probably dated badly, but to me the salvageable bits are a treasure, and the hokey bits bearable.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Handley's film
kmoh-127 October 2017
This is an amusing film, with a surprisingly early use of the concept of a time machine (Hungary's Sziriusz, from 1942, predates it), invented by professorial Felix Aylmer and crookedly financed by lovable scoundrel Tommy Handley. Thanks to a chapter of accidents, they go back in time to the sixteenth century, together with a vaudeville double act, the excellent Evelyn Dall and quite good George Moon. Presumably they hoped the film would get a US audience, as the modern-day bookends are set in a New York made of cardboard, all the money is in dollars and all the Elizabethan characters are carefully explained by Moon reading out of an encyclopedia.

Between them they give Shakespeare the lines for Romeo and Juliet's balcony scene, teach Elizabeth I how to play Find the Lady, introduce Stephane Grapelli's troubadour to jazz, and give Sir Walter Raleigh his first smoke. Tommy can't stop himself swindling people, and sells America off to the English nobility, much to the chagrin of Captain John Smith. Smith is accompanied by a statuesque and politically incorrect Pocahontas (the virtually unknown Iris Lang in a wonderful performance), who is surprisingly able to drink everyone under the table. Moore Marriott appears fleetingly in a pillory, and there is a bit more of Graham Moffatt, in their last film together.

It is a surprise to realise that Handley made so few films. As a radio comic, his trademark was idiotic double talk and lame puns strung together almost too quickly for the audience to groan. His screen time is always confident and he is obviously the star. He even dominates the opening scene from behind a curtain. It's That Man Again brilliantly realised the surreal radio series ITMA for the screen, and Time Flies, released a year later, might easily have led to a film career, but this was his last full-length picture.

The humour is of course of its time - if you don't like the highly verbal wordplay popularised by British wartime radio, then you won't like Handley's scenes very much. But Handley almost matches Will Hay in his creation of a wily, despicable, cowardly, cheating and yet wholly likable petty crook, played without the remotest hint of sentimentality.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
MacAndrew's Machine
richardchatten18 April 2020
A quirky attempt at science fiction by Gainsborough Pictures. The mind boggles at what Goebbels must have made of this piece of fanciful wartime escapism if he ever saw it!

A zany time travel comedy that begins and ends in New York (hence the 'topical' jokes about Roosevelt and Walter Winchell) concerning a time machine that takes Tommy Handley back to the court of Queen Elizabeth; like a 'Dr Who' adventure played for laughs.

Referred to by it's inventor Felix Aylmer as 'The Time Ball', the time machine itself - with the possible exception of marking Graham Moffatt & Moore Marriott's final screen appearance together - is the most memorable aspect of the film (presumably the work of veteran art director John Bryan), whose equivalent it functions as of the Tardis. Resembling a flying bathysphere; the few effects shots of it in flight being obviously cheap but nevertheless satisfying.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
So stupid it's actually funny
calvertfan20 March 2002
Time travel comes about unexpectedly for Tommy, Susie, Bill and the Professor. The Prof. has invented this "timeball" which is like an earlier model of the car from Back To The Future. He's showing Susie the ins and outs of it, not worrying about hitting all the buttons because it won't work unless the trapdoor is shut. Thing is, Bill and Tommy, on the run from some cops, have climbed into the giant sphere to hide, and shut the door after them! So they go whizzing up a million miles, Susie slams a lever accidentally, they all get knocked out due to lack of oxygen, and when they awake, it's in 16th century England.

Tommy is throwing jokes over his shoulder at every opportunity, this starts off as funny but soon wears very thin. He's up to his neck in trouble, teaching the Queen how to gamble and then pretending he owns America and selling off blocks of land to the townsfolk and noblemen. The Prof is all very serious and ends up being arrested when he comments on how "Queen Bess" died - of course, this is the time when she is still holding court. Bill bumbles around a lot. It's Susie who has the most fun. She's got a voice like Ginger Rogers, and twice as much energy as Betty Hutton, and is hilarious to watch, whether trying to hail a cab (in 16th century London!), or prompting Shakespeare with lines from Romeo & Juliet, dressing up as a man, and singing any number of lively songs to buy a little time before they are all drawn and quartered.

Very, very weird. But still quite enjoyable. 8/10.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Time Flies was a very funny motion picture I enjoyed immensely!
hhbooker2-125 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
TIME FLIES was a really nice motion picture that was able to combine comedy, drama, musical, and science fiction all into one seamlessly. It was plausible that a "Time Machine" of a spherical ball would be the most logical way to travel trough time to the time of William Shakespeare and Queen Elizabeth I. The people who took the trip back in time fit right in with their stage and musical talent. One quaint scene was when "The Bard" (Will Shakespeare) was trying to complete a scene and the leading lady gave him the words he was fumbling with. A capital scene was when the gambler among the crew taught the "Virgin Queen" how to win with the old pea in a empty walnut shell half, the "Shell Game," and later they smuggle a motion picture camera and film into a jail cell and flash it on the wall frightening the guards who had never seen such "silver screen" images on the wall of the cell. It does help them effect their freedom and they escape into the time machine sphere, but it is hauled in on a horse-drawn wagon to be set afire and of course the skill of the gambler tricks the assembled mob waiting to see the auto-de-fey! Those who had not been able to get back into the time machine do so in the ensuing confusion and they make their way to the late 1930s or early 1940s. All in all, it is a charming film worth a second and third look see! Sarge Booker of Tujunga, California
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A triumph!
JohnHowardReid14 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Not copyrighted or theatrically released in the U.S.A. Released in the U.K. through General Film Distributors: 8 May 1944. London trade show: 22 February 1944. 88 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: A confidence man promotes a time machine which, to his surprise, actually works! NOTES: One of the top twenty popular attractions at British cinemas in 1944.

COMMENT: A couple of minor disappointments - Moore Marriott's role is not only pifflingly small, it's not very funny, and while Moffatt's role is larger, it's virtually a straight part; and the special photographic effects seem amateurish by present standards - but otherwise a most enjoyable trip to Elizabethan London.

Not only are all the players - particularly Miss Dall - in fine form, but the quips come quick and fast. Sets, costumes and production values generally are incredibly lavish, with director Forde making the most of his many set-pieces and crowd scenes.

We particularly admired Olga Lindo's querulous Elizabeth, Roy Emerton's roughhouse Smith, Bradley's easily-conned Raleigh, and Salew's lost-for-a-word Shakespeare. And the songs are such a swinging delight, we wish there were more!

All told, a journey we were most happy to make.

OTHER VIEWS: A succession of delightfully weak puns, enthusiastically acted, directed with style and panache through dazzlingly authentic-looking sets and miniatures, this entertaining Female Yankee in Queen Elizabeth's Court is further enlivened by bright musical interludes. To quote The Manchester Guardian, the movie is "a triumph."
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed