Dangerous Charter (1962) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Should've Worked
boblipton18 July 2023
Three fishermen come across a yacht, abandoned except for a corpse. They're puzzled, but tow it back to port and put in for salvage. It's approved, but the police want to know what they're going to do with her. They reply there's a lot of money in the charter business. Surprisingly, the police have already put the charter notice in the papers. All they ask is that they be informed when someone wants the boat. It turns out to Dick Foote, with plenty of cash, working for a mysterious boss. The police are uncertain, so the owners set to sea with Foote: Chris Warfield, Chick Chandler, Wright King, and Warfield's fiancee, Sally Fraser, as cook.

It's a good story, competent if minor actors in place, Technicolor and Panavision, and some nice at-sea photography and off Catalina. So what is it that makes me consider it another poorly executed B movie? I concluded it's Peter Forster as the mysterious guy who pays for the charter comes on board in an absurdly unnecessary manner, and speaks in ripe, plummy tones at all times. It's also something about the pacing, mostly the odd pauses in the dialogue. Writer/director Robert Gottschalk seems to know what people say, but no clear idea of how they say it, or perhaps was simply trying to save money by avoiding extra takes.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Cheap seafaring mystery
Leofwine_draca12 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
DANGEROUS CHARTER is an entirely cheap seafaring thriller filmed on the blue seas around California. It was one of the first pictures distributed by Crown International Pictures and like a lot of their work it's a rather stodgy and disappointing effort with only a few elements of interest to lift it. It doesn't help that the film stock is very poor leaving this a fuzzy-looking viewing experience.

However, it's not all bad and a fast pace means that this is at least a quick watch. The story is about three goofy sailors who discover a ghost ship floating in the ocean. There's a corpse on board but the police have no leads, so they decide to grant the ship to the guys who found it thanks to salvage rights. In reality they're being used as bait to hopefully bring out those who know something about the situation.

The first half of the film ladles on the mystery while the second half becomes something of a hostage thriller. It's all rather inept with a non-acting cast going through the paces, little surprise given that the thing was shot in just five days. Sally Fraser looks great in a bikini but other than her eye candy presence there's little of note to remember about this one.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Abandoned ships probably shouldn't be boarded by amateur sailors.
mark.waltz2 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This cheaply made adventure film was filmed in 1958 and not released until 1962, and it looks like something filmed for early color television rather than something that would be shown in cinemas. The premise is good, dealing with the discovery of an abandoned where a dead body is discovered and those boarding are unaware of the stash being hidden worth millions of dollars. All of a sudden, a friendly fishing vessel tries to sell them langoliers cheaply and turns out to be the vessel where "Mr. Big" (Peter Forster) is hiding, having been responsible for the murder and the stashing of a valuable cargo of heroin. Now the crew is held hostage, being forced to take Forster to Catalina, and this leads to some very shocking and violent turns in another episode of "crime does not pay".

Enjoyable but predictable, this low budget color film doesn't really feature any stars, although I did recognize Sally Fraser as the girlfriend of one of the people who discovered the yacht, coming aboard when they meet her ashore. The crew of the film does the best that they can with the budget that they have, and while the print is not terrible, it's obvious that it took a while for finances to get the film off the ground after it was completed and into theaters. Acting is surprisingly decent and the script is not terrible. But it's a pretty generic crime film overall, occasionally including a scene that raise my eyebrows, including one particularly brutal death at the end.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Actually not that bad
Wizard-825 October 2014
I sat down to watch this movie without knowing all that much about it, though I was expecting the worst. To my surprise, I didn't find the movie to be terrible at all. True, it is not without faults. It's pretty low budget, with the seams (or cameraman shadows) showing at times. Also, the movie is a bit too low key; the bad guys don't come across as a real threat in almost all of their scenes. On the positive side, however, the movie moves at a pretty swift pace; the seventy four or so minute running time seems the right length for this particular story. And the movie does keep you curious as to what plot turns will happen and if the protagonists will be able to escape from harm. While I don't think this is a movie that's worth actively seeking out, I can say with full confidence that I have seen many, many movies that are much worse than this one. If you stumble across this movie, give it a chance.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Medusa
richardchatten13 August 2020
The 'Marie Celeste' mystery meets 'Key Largo' in the form of a couple of bad guys led by an effete Mr.Big who misquotes Shakespeare and obliges the heroine to change into a pink bathing suit to allay suspicion onshore in this tinny little hostage drama shot in colour almost entirely on board an actual yacht off Santa Catalina Island.

By the look of the thing the hire of the yacht and the other boats used probably occupied more time and money than actually making the movie...
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A technological film
BandSAboutMovies8 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
1962's Dangerous Charter is the only narrative film directed and produced by Robert Gottschalk, who helped found Panavision. This film was to be a showcase for his new process and camera lenses.

Instead, it is 75 minutes that feels like 75 hours, an odyssey at sea that seems to never end. It has no motorcycles in it, no matter what the Savage Cinema box art may promise

The crew of a fishing boat finds a deserted luxury yacht at sea with a dead body and half a million of heroin on board. There is no Blind Dead to save this movie, just a lot of talking. In fact, they may still be talking as I write about this movie.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A plague ship
nogodnomasters11 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Marty (Chris Warfield) and his fishing crew who have a tug boat come across and abandoned yacht with no pedigree. There is a body on board, a victim of the mumps. The authorities suspect it was used for drug smuggling. Rather than impound it, they opt to set up the fishermen by letting them have said boat and charter it out. The bad guy is described as an early Keyser Soze, but didn't make the grade. As expected the bad guys show up...

The film was boring, poorly shot, and not well preserved. Available on multi-packs.

Guide: Made in the 50's.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you take it on its own terms its not a bad way to spend 75 minutes
dbborroughs29 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Good B movie thriller about a fishing boat that finds a deserted yacht and takes it in. There is no sign of who owns it but the authorities suspect a certain known criminal. The authorities turn the boat over to the fishing boat crew under the laws of salvage but warn them the boats previous owner might want to get it back. Of course he does and what follows is the rest of the movie. Not particularly original this is a very watchable little thriller that follows all of the typical conventions of a story like this. Is it the best film ever to come down the pike, no, but I didn't mind spending the 75 minutes with it that it took to tell the story, which in many cases is all one can ask of a film.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good B-Movie!
jd-driscoll28 May 2011
OK, so it's not Taylor/Burton material! But so what? Remarkable as it was only shot in five days! Why do 'Premier' Movies take months........?

I think this is a testament to excellent acting/directing and production skills. There is a good story line, albeit a little predictable.

All in all a very watchable movie. I feel the actors delivered exactly what was required of them. We must remember this was filmed in the late Fifty's and 'Aired' in 1962.

A very different time and place from today! If you get the chance please watch this film.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very decent sea-based thriller
Red-Barracuda8 June 2015
Three fishermen discover an abandoned yacht in the middle of the ocean; they board it and discover a dead body. The authorities let them keep the boat guessing that the real owner to be a mysterious criminal who they suspect will try to charter it, which of course does happen and needless to say his intentions are no good.

Dangerous Charter was filmed in 1958 but not released until 1962. I am not too sure why this was but guess it found difficulty in getting a distribution deal. This seems a little unfair as this is a well-paced and pretty suspenseful little thriller. Unlike most sea-based movies it actually looks like it was shot on board the vessel. This authenticity does it some favours and the scenes at sea are very nice. The story itself is quite a routine affair but I did find myself involved with it and was actually bothered by what was happening on-screen. On the whole, this is a more than decent little genre piece.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than average!
JohnHowardReid16 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was obviously photographed entirely on real locations with real boats, yachts and other marine craft sailing on real seas. There are no studio scenes at all. This is both an advantage and a disadvantage. Obviously some of the scenes will hold our interest, whilst other scenes will inevitably seem a bit repetitious.

Fortunately, the players are almost always equal to their tasks, although only the lovely Sally Fraser really excels. She is the only one who stays in your mind long after the movie is over! This was her final movie too. She did make a couple of TV appearances, I think it was six years later.

The director, Robert Gottschalk, has taken full advantage of his many real-life locations and manages to keep up the audience's interest on a high level, despite a plot that evinces not much more than average interest, although it does have a couple of good action spots

Aside from Miss Fraser, the other players are little more than reasonably competent,. Generally, they fail to make the script hold more than a seventy per cent attention, but this is not a bad score as the plot is nothing like extra special. But it serves its purpose, namely to keep us rooting for the good guys, even though they may be a bit slow to catch on to the baddies!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Modest, but enjoyable and effective little B thriller
Woodyanders14 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A down on their luck fishing boat crew discover an abandoned yacht on the open sea with $500,000 dollars in heroin hidden on board. Trouble ensues when a gang of no-count criminals show up looking to take the heroin for themselves. Director Robert Gottschalk, working from a compact script by Paul Strait, relates the absorbing story at a steady pace, develops a good deal of tension, makes nice use of the high seas setting, and stages the exciting climax with real skill and flair. The sound acting from the capable non-star cast rates as another substantial asset: Chris Warfield as no-nonsense skipper Marty, Sally Fraser as perky'n'pretty blonde June, Richard Foote as the charming Dick, Chick Chandler as amiable old sea salt Kick, and Wright King as the excitable King. However, Peter Forster clearly cops the top thespic honors with his stand-out smooth portrayal of suave and urbane drug smuggler Monet. The tight 75 minute running time ensures that this film never gets dull or overstays its welcome. The members of the fishing boat crew display an engagingly natural chemistry. Both Meredith M. Nicholson's competent cinematography and Ted Dale's robust'n'rousing score are up to par. A cool flick.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Dangerous Charter
trimbolicelia15 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Not bad early 60s color thriller. A trio of fishermen find an abandoned yacht with a dead body aboard. Though the dead body died of unattended mumps, the real mystery is what happened to the other people on the boat. The fishermen claim the yacht as salvage and set up a charter business. What they don't expect is that the real owners abandoned the yacht for a reason. They don't want the boat back, but what is hidden in it. Filmed in California waters around Catalina. Nice scenery. The Film Detective DVD-R is nicely cleaned up, probably the best available at this time. Better than the Savage Cinema DVD. It still needs proper re-mastering, but being an obscurity it won't happen any time soon. Still worth viewing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed