This film is absolutely gem (sequel included). The direction, acting, script and cinematography is spot on. I feel that the casting director should get a special mention as I don't believe you can find a better cast to play out the characters in the book. I feel this is where it mainly succeeded where other versions have failed. Megan Follows is Anne in every way. Excellent performances from Coleen Dewhurst and Richard Farnsworth help bring the story to life as well. A film translation from a book is never better than the book itself. I think this film and it's sequel are an exception.
91 Reviews
Best movie ever made.
phylliswin13 February 2007
Anne of Green Gables is a movie that holds a special place in my heart. I first saw this with my mother years ago, and it quickly became our favorite movie. We must have watched it every time we were together. And no matter how many times we watched it, every viewing always seemed like the first time all over again. We laughed and cried at all the same places, and couldn't wait until the day when Gilbert and Anne would finally be together. My mother developed cancer and suffered for two years. This movie was a wonderful escape for her and myself. I lost her 4 months ago, and at first I thought I would never be able to watch this movie ever again, but I was wrong. It only means that much more to me now. For now it holds even more wonderful memories. This is a movie that is meant to be shared with someone special. Just as I did.
Megan Follows IS Anne Shirley & Jonathan Crombie IS Gilbert Blythe
THFC30 December 1998
For those of us who have loved L.M. Montgomery's books as both children and adults every depiction of them is very closely scrutinised. This Kevin Sullivan production is the only one that has come up to scratch, which isn't surprising as earlier attempts have failed abysmally (one even had Diana played by an insipid blonde!).But with faithful scripting, inspired casting, excellent direction and beautiful camera work, there is simply nothing negative to be said about this show. Sullivan sticks very closely to the original book and all the characters, from the central ones right down to those we hardly ever see, such as silly Ruby Gillis and spiteful Josie Pye, are superbly and sensitively observed by the actors portraying them.
I have read and re-read many favourite books but never before have I found myself imagining the characters as the actors who played them on screen - especially having read the books at least twice over before seeing any production of them. The highest complement I can pay to the cast of Sullivan's "Anne of Green Gables" is that any previous images I might have had of these much loved characters were wiped out of mind by their wonderful depictions of them. Richard Farnsworth, Colleen Dewhurst, Schuyler Grant, Jonathan Crombie and Patricia Hamilton were all brilliant. As for Megan Follows - well, what can I say? She is a truly wonderful actress (not only on the strength of this performance) and no one could ever match her portrayal of Anne Shirley.
One last thing - if there are any fans of "The Kids in the Hall" reading this watch out for Bruce McCulloch as Fred Wright... you'll fall out of your chair! (And Dave Foley has a cameo in the sequel).
I have read and re-read many favourite books but never before have I found myself imagining the characters as the actors who played them on screen - especially having read the books at least twice over before seeing any production of them. The highest complement I can pay to the cast of Sullivan's "Anne of Green Gables" is that any previous images I might have had of these much loved characters were wiped out of mind by their wonderful depictions of them. Richard Farnsworth, Colleen Dewhurst, Schuyler Grant, Jonathan Crombie and Patricia Hamilton were all brilliant. As for Megan Follows - well, what can I say? She is a truly wonderful actress (not only on the strength of this performance) and no one could ever match her portrayal of Anne Shirley.
One last thing - if there are any fans of "The Kids in the Hall" reading this watch out for Bruce McCulloch as Fred Wright... you'll fall out of your chair! (And Dave Foley has a cameo in the sequel).
Like an exquisite vacation!!!
PeachHamBeach20 November 1999
Every time I watch Anne of Green Gables, I am transported out of my living room in California in 1999 and into the beautiful colorful time of 1908 and Avonlea, PEI. It is such a simple yet beautiful story. As a person who usually prefers movies nothing at all like this, I am shamelessly admitting that I adore everything about these stories from L.M. Montgomery. And even if they had put in a special order, they never could have found anyone more suitable to play Anne than Megan Follows. No matter what else I see her in, she's Anne Shirley, and she will always be the only Anne Shirley. If I'm stressed or upset, I have only to go to Anne's world. It's like an inexpensive vacation!!! : )
Fantastic
sharynd15 November 2002
This movie is my all time favourite. Still to this day I cry & get emotional during certain scenes & no matter how many times Ive seen this. Megan Follows, Jonathan Crombie, Colleen Dewhurst and Richard Farnsworth did a tremendous job. The story of a little orphan girl who finally is adopted by the right people is great. The scenary is breath taking, what a marvelous place to have been while making this movie. Any one who enjoys a good love/drama watch this. You will be surprised in how much you enjoy it. Dont forget the sequels they are just as great. Especially if you want to know what happens to Anne & Gilbert.....
Absolutely amazing!
TheLittleSongbird6 June 2012
This 1985 Anne of Green Gables has always been one of my all-time favourites. I love the book also, and while I am the kind of person who watches an adaptation on its own merits while sometimes suggesting what could have been done instead, I found this adaptation to be true in detail and spirit to the book. The adaptation looks beautiful, lush scenery, beautiful but never idealistic costumes and photography are definite things to like, as well as the charming lilting score. The script has its fair share of droll and heart-warming moments, and the story is still the one I know and love, timeless, thought-provoking and simply beautiful. The pacing I found perfect, I personally never found it flat, then again I was so entranced in everything else I would have overlooked it. The acting I can't fault, Megan Follows is a wonderful actress and her Anne is always likable. Jonathan Crombie also embodies the role of Gilbert, Collette Dewhurst's performance is a perfect blend of hard and soft and Richard Farnsworth is a charming Matthew. In conclusion, amazing, was a favourite, still is and always will be. 10/10 Bethany Cox
An excellent movie
moviebuf-2810 March 1999
I have always loved the "Anne" books, and I always imagined myself as Anne Shirley. So I expected to be disappointed at "Anne of Green Gables." I was far from disappointed. Megan Follows was excellent as Anne Shirley. She captured the dreamy, romantic quality of Anne beautifully. All of the other actors were marvelous in the movie as well.
I think the countryside was also gorgeous, and the filming of it was breathtaking. It was an terrific movie!
I think the countryside was also gorgeous, and the filming of it was breathtaking. It was an terrific movie!
Possibly the most perfect movie ever made
midnightcub21 May 2019
On a scale of 1 to 10 this is 135. There are precious few films that did every single thing right. That you absolutely feel better for having watched it.
The actors are perfect, the music is ideal, the quiet beautiful moments that capture Prince Edward Island will transport you to another (better) time and place.
None of the remakes after this have come close. Some have even tarnished Anne and the story and this film.
If there is a true list of movies everyone should see before they die. This film belongs on it and near the top. If not absolutely the #1 spot
Anne is my best friend...
Rmaxthedog7 September 2007
Well, I was 14 when I first saw Anne of Green Gables on the PBS channel for a pledge drive. I didn't read the books or anything. I asked my mom if she has seen it and she told me it was stupid and she didn't like it at all, but in spite of her dislike I watched it. It's a tale that just about every girl can relate to...trying to fit in, being competitive/defying everyone, having that one bestest best friend forever and girls that are most certainly not, new dresses, handsome school boys, or prospects of graduating and going off to college or work. This movie isn't for every one though...Anne can be a little too imaginative for some people (like my mom), but she can also be insightful and help young girls discover themselves as "kindred spirits."
This is my fantasy!
SimonPoint10 July 2004
I can't remember the first time I saw this movie, along with the sequel. It seems always to have a part of my childhood and now my adulthood. I simply adore this movie, it's so wonderful, and surprisingly faithful to the book. I just bought the soundtrack online, and even without the visuals I turn into a blubbering mess. Meghan Follows is, quite honestly, perfect for this role. Even though she's not a natural ginger (*sniff), she captures the spirit of Anne Shirley wonderfully. Collen Dewhurst is terrifying and loving at the same time, and Matthew, oh my god! Just great acting everywhere!
When I was about 5 years old, I wanted so much to live in this film, or at least on P.E.I. at the turn of the century. That fantasy is rekindled everytime I watch it. I was also a huge fan of the the Avonlea show, which used to air on the Disney Channel. I'm still waiting for the whole thing to get released on DVD, so if anyone knows anything about that, PLEASE tell me!! Thanks for reading, bye!
When I was about 5 years old, I wanted so much to live in this film, or at least on P.E.I. at the turn of the century. That fantasy is rekindled everytime I watch it. I was also a huge fan of the the Avonlea show, which used to air on the Disney Channel. I'm still waiting for the whole thing to get released on DVD, so if anyone knows anything about that, PLEASE tell me!! Thanks for reading, bye!
A Canadian classic I as a Brit had never seen. Wonderful and charming. Recommend this as well as the 1987 sequel, as well as Season 1 of Anne with an E
mickman91-125 February 2022
I'm a Brit and had never seen this Canadian classic. Its not one that I've ever seen on TV here. I was glad I did because it is a faithful version of the novel and is totally wholesome and charming. It is like our version of the Railway Children. Great family with timeless messages to be watched time and time again on Sundays and at holidays. The girl who plays Anne does an incredible job at carrying the entire 4 hours as well as the 4 hour sequel which aired in 1987 which covers the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Anne novels. I watched Anne with an E before this and that was also wonderful for the first season which follows very closely the first half of the first Anne novel, but unfortunately it started to diverge from season 2 and the writing quality went down and felt overly padded out. But the first season of Anne with an E spends much more time than the 1985 film so I recommend watching the first season of Anne with an E as well this 1985 version and the 1987 version for a faithful account of the first 4 books in the Anne series (the books in which she is the main character, the following books she takes a back role).
the best tv ever
emma26410 March 2004
first saw this when first shown on channel 4 and have loved it since. Have all the videos but ration myself to watching them only every couple of years to keep them special...even so, know all the words!! megan follows is perfect as anne, and gilbert is also perfect. i love the way the writer has caught the essentials of the stories without ruining them.
Kind of wish they hadnt attempted the 3rd series tho - the story was so way off the mark of the books and just didnt seem to carry on properly from the first 2. And anne being tempted by another man?! impossible with lovely gilbert around! i read somewhere that megan follows had been in an accident before filmim=ng of the continuing story, which accounts for her looking so much older in that one. is this true?
Kind of wish they hadnt attempted the 3rd series tho - the story was so way off the mark of the books and just didnt seem to carry on properly from the first 2. And anne being tempted by another man?! impossible with lovely gilbert around! i read somewhere that megan follows had been in an accident before filmim=ng of the continuing story, which accounts for her looking so much older in that one. is this true?
LOVE IT
stbookdragon16 April 2020
Oh my goodness I love this movie!!! It is accurate to the book, a quality I find important, and the actors basically are their characters. I have a hard time thinking of Jonathan Crombie or Meagan Follows without thinking of their respective characters. I could watch this movie anytime, and I highly recommend it!
Wonderfully shot, and high production values.
Blueghost16 September 2003
I was highly impressed with this production when I first saw it over ten years ago. The cinematography is very intimate, and does a fine job of showing some very picturesque coastal and rural scenery. The costuming and overall art direction is first class in both this production and it's followup "Anne of Avonlea."
The acting is very rich and natural from all the female leads, though somewhat dry from the younger males. There's a touch of melodrama in all their performances, but this aspect reflects accurately I think the behavioral norms for the period.
The stories are personal reflections of author Lucy Maud Montgomery, set around Prince Rupert Island, and placed in a 3rd person narrative for her series of books. The books are once again transcribed to screenplay format for this mini series, and though I've never read the books I must say I'm very impressed with the production.
The blend of colors, costumes, acting talent and overall direction really make this and its sequel very enjoyable to watch. Sadly the third installment doesn't quite live up to the standards set by the first two mini series, but is still watchable.
The SFX were also very convincing (what few there were). I won't spoil the film by pointing them out, but nevertheless they help set the general visual feel of the characters, and better establish their ages.
Myself, I'm a guns-n-spaceships movie kind of guy, but I do appreciate a gentle reflection on the more important things in life. In this case the story of the pains and fortunes of growing up. I highly reccomend this to anyone who needs a break from real life or wants a change in pace from the usual Hollywood offerings.
The acting is very rich and natural from all the female leads, though somewhat dry from the younger males. There's a touch of melodrama in all their performances, but this aspect reflects accurately I think the behavioral norms for the period.
The stories are personal reflections of author Lucy Maud Montgomery, set around Prince Rupert Island, and placed in a 3rd person narrative for her series of books. The books are once again transcribed to screenplay format for this mini series, and though I've never read the books I must say I'm very impressed with the production.
The blend of colors, costumes, acting talent and overall direction really make this and its sequel very enjoyable to watch. Sadly the third installment doesn't quite live up to the standards set by the first two mini series, but is still watchable.
The SFX were also very convincing (what few there were). I won't spoil the film by pointing them out, but nevertheless they help set the general visual feel of the characters, and better establish their ages.
Myself, I'm a guns-n-spaceships movie kind of guy, but I do appreciate a gentle reflection on the more important things in life. In this case the story of the pains and fortunes of growing up. I highly reccomend this to anyone who needs a break from real life or wants a change in pace from the usual Hollywood offerings.
Ultimately satisfying in a family movie
tnuzum-130 August 2004
I really enjoyed this movie as a young pre-teen and even on into my teens. Now that I am in my 20's I reviewed the film and it has the same place in my heart that it did some 14 plus years ago.
This movie is fulfilling, satisfying and enriches the heart. The simple and eligante movie is one that all families can appreciate and enjoy.
I love this movie very much and I laughed, cried and got mad while watching it.
I recommend this movie very highly. It's clean, pure and innocent, something our society is missing today.
Very classy movie!
This movie is fulfilling, satisfying and enriches the heart. The simple and eligante movie is one that all families can appreciate and enjoy.
I love this movie very much and I laughed, cried and got mad while watching it.
I recommend this movie very highly. It's clean, pure and innocent, something our society is missing today.
Very classy movie!
Put this in the VCR now or suffer the consequences...
book addict26 February 2002
I had never read Anne of Green Gables. But I was at a sleepover with my best friend Helen, and she had rented the film. I was just 'OK, let's watch it'. And I was stricken. It was brilliant!!!!!!!!! From the moment Anne starts reading 'The Lady of Shalott' - one of my favourite poems - I knew I would love her. Megan Follows is the one person who can bring Anne to life...It was all I could do not to beg Helen to tell me the ending. It's wonderful...and Gilbert Blythe is great, in spite of his name (GILBERT??? You just don't call people GILBERT...). From the second Diana talked about him, I knew 'that's Anne's soulmate'. My heart totally ached for Anne when I saw Diana making other friends and looking wistfully at 'her bosom friend...10 out of 10, EXCELLENT.
EXCELLENT!! ONE OF MY ALL TIME FAVORITES!!!
gilbyrrison31 November 2004
This movie is such a wonderful piece of art!!! It truly follows all that L. M. Montgomery imagined!!!
I definitely recommend its sequels, starring the same cast!!
The romance between Anne and Gilbert is enchanting, the scenery is beautiful, Anne and Diana's friendship is overwhelming, and Marilla, Matthew, and Rachel Lynde will all become dear to your heart.
If you love the movie, you will love the books!!! I know that I did, and I feel as if Green Gables and all of Anne, Diana, and Gilbert's "haunts" (aka Lover's Lane, Dryad's Bubble, the Lake of Shining Waters, the Haunted Wood) are a part of me, as well as Avonlea and everywhere else Anne goes.
I definitely recommend its sequels, starring the same cast!!
The romance between Anne and Gilbert is enchanting, the scenery is beautiful, Anne and Diana's friendship is overwhelming, and Marilla, Matthew, and Rachel Lynde will all become dear to your heart.
If you love the movie, you will love the books!!! I know that I did, and I feel as if Green Gables and all of Anne, Diana, and Gilbert's "haunts" (aka Lover's Lane, Dryad's Bubble, the Lake of Shining Waters, the Haunted Wood) are a part of me, as well as Avonlea and everywhere else Anne goes.
A True Delight
Vertigo-2721 July 1999
Easily one of the best movies done, from a book! In such rare occasions (as this) the remake is better than the original... Megan Follows is a brillant actress... one could only but wonder why we dont see her in any other movies.....
The classic story will make you laugh, cry, and make you never want it to end.... There even happens to be a sequel, most think it is just as good, but me... it no where near touches this one... Anne Of Green Gables... Is a 10 all the way, and is a true delight, and that is not hard to see!
The classic story will make you laugh, cry, and make you never want it to end.... There even happens to be a sequel, most think it is just as good, but me... it no where near touches this one... Anne Of Green Gables... Is a 10 all the way, and is a true delight, and that is not hard to see!
Anne of Green Gables
dav07dan028 June 2005
Director: Kevin Sullivan, Novel: Lucy Maud Montgomery, Cast: Megan Follows, Colleen Dewhurst, Richard Farnsworth.
I have a lot of movies of all different genres (esp horror, sci-fi)but I must confess, this is truly one of my all time favorites. This is a story about an orphan girl that gets taken up by a brother and sister from Green Gables. Only they think she is a boy. While Marilla(played by Colleen Dewhurst) is not at all happy when the person that shows up on her doorstep is a girl!
This is a three hour long epic about the life of Anne Shirley and her experience at Green Gables with Marilla and Matthew Cuthbert. This is a very charming movie with many funny moments. The interaction between Marilla and Anne is often amusing. Meegan Follows, Colleen Dewhurst and Richard Farnsworth are just amazing in the respective parts. This movie may have the best casting of all time. Every actor truly shines in this movie. It is hard to explain but this movie captures a certain comfort and homeyness like no other film. It is set in the early 1900's (a latter setting than the book,I believe) and the sets and costumes are very authentic. This is one of the few films that my wife and I both enjoy! This is a great family movie. This film spawned two sequels. Kevin Sullivan has made other good family movies.
I have a lot of movies of all different genres (esp horror, sci-fi)but I must confess, this is truly one of my all time favorites. This is a story about an orphan girl that gets taken up by a brother and sister from Green Gables. Only they think she is a boy. While Marilla(played by Colleen Dewhurst) is not at all happy when the person that shows up on her doorstep is a girl!
This is a three hour long epic about the life of Anne Shirley and her experience at Green Gables with Marilla and Matthew Cuthbert. This is a very charming movie with many funny moments. The interaction between Marilla and Anne is often amusing. Meegan Follows, Colleen Dewhurst and Richard Farnsworth are just amazing in the respective parts. This movie may have the best casting of all time. Every actor truly shines in this movie. It is hard to explain but this movie captures a certain comfort and homeyness like no other film. It is set in the early 1900's (a latter setting than the book,I believe) and the sets and costumes are very authentic. This is one of the few films that my wife and I both enjoy! This is a great family movie. This film spawned two sequels. Kevin Sullivan has made other good family movies.
Entirely Disarming
gcd7010 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Picturesque Prince Edward Island is the setting for this marvellous mini series about a talkative and highly imaginative young orphan girl who is taken in by a brother and sister who were looking for a boy to help them tend their farm.
Megan Follows is wonderful as the dreamy Anne (with an 'e') Shirley, whose fiery temper and "feather brain ways" land her in hot water constantly. She plays the little girl growing up and coming to terms with reality and the challenges of life with real meaning. In support of her is the charming Richard Farnsworth and an outstanding Colleen Dewhurst as Matthew and Marilla Cuthbert. The entire cast are in fact a real pleasure.
Adding to this delightful film of L. M. Montgomery's novel is Hagood Hardy's music and the spectacular cinematography from Rene Ohashi. Kevin Sullivan directs with absolute assuredness as he delivers an impeccably well balanced show full of touching drama and charming humour, whilst his costume and set designers recreate the late 19th century with unerring accuracy.
"Anne of Green Gables" will do more than make you smile, it will have you positively beaming. An absolute must for all the family, and anyone who wishes to have their senses and emotions filled to the brim. Entirely disarming!
Sunday, July 3, 1994 - Video
Lucy Maud Montgomery's "Anne of Green Gables" has been splendidly adapted to the small screen by director Kevin Sullivan in this Canadian television production, recapturing the style and mood of the book and transporting the audience to the early 20th century with ease.
Totally charming in every way, this two part mini-series fills one's heart with emotion and one's eyes with tears. It is entertainment in the purest form. Colleen Dewhurst is an absolute must as the strict disciplinarian Marilla Cuthbert, a hard woman hiding a soft heart of pure gold, she is irresistible, as is the disarming "Anne with an 'e'", Megan Follows, the girl blessed with a wild imagination and a temper to match. Follows has absolutely no trouble endearing the audience to Montgomery's lovable "Anne of Green Gables", and the same can be said about the entire support cast, but especially Richard Farnsworth as Marilla's brother Matthew, the gentle, shy old man who falls for Anne's foolish, feather-brained ways.
Complimenting all the outstanding acting is Hagood Hardy's majestic score, Rene O'Hashi's spectacular cinematography ( which breathes life into the picturesque Prince Edward Island) and the wonderfully authentic costumes and sets.
Unfortunately the sequel, "Anne of Green Gables Part II", failed to live up to this picture's delightful splendour.
Sunday, July 16, 1995 - Video
Megan Follows is wonderful as the dreamy Anne (with an 'e') Shirley, whose fiery temper and "feather brain ways" land her in hot water constantly. She plays the little girl growing up and coming to terms with reality and the challenges of life with real meaning. In support of her is the charming Richard Farnsworth and an outstanding Colleen Dewhurst as Matthew and Marilla Cuthbert. The entire cast are in fact a real pleasure.
Adding to this delightful film of L. M. Montgomery's novel is Hagood Hardy's music and the spectacular cinematography from Rene Ohashi. Kevin Sullivan directs with absolute assuredness as he delivers an impeccably well balanced show full of touching drama and charming humour, whilst his costume and set designers recreate the late 19th century with unerring accuracy.
"Anne of Green Gables" will do more than make you smile, it will have you positively beaming. An absolute must for all the family, and anyone who wishes to have their senses and emotions filled to the brim. Entirely disarming!
Sunday, July 3, 1994 - Video
Lucy Maud Montgomery's "Anne of Green Gables" has been splendidly adapted to the small screen by director Kevin Sullivan in this Canadian television production, recapturing the style and mood of the book and transporting the audience to the early 20th century with ease.
Totally charming in every way, this two part mini-series fills one's heart with emotion and one's eyes with tears. It is entertainment in the purest form. Colleen Dewhurst is an absolute must as the strict disciplinarian Marilla Cuthbert, a hard woman hiding a soft heart of pure gold, she is irresistible, as is the disarming "Anne with an 'e'", Megan Follows, the girl blessed with a wild imagination and a temper to match. Follows has absolutely no trouble endearing the audience to Montgomery's lovable "Anne of Green Gables", and the same can be said about the entire support cast, but especially Richard Farnsworth as Marilla's brother Matthew, the gentle, shy old man who falls for Anne's foolish, feather-brained ways.
Complimenting all the outstanding acting is Hagood Hardy's majestic score, Rene O'Hashi's spectacular cinematography ( which breathes life into the picturesque Prince Edward Island) and the wonderfully authentic costumes and sets.
Unfortunately the sequel, "Anne of Green Gables Part II", failed to live up to this picture's delightful splendour.
Sunday, July 16, 1995 - Video
A true delight!
Shannon-3221 September 1999
I first saw this film when I was 11 and we were reading "Anne of Green Gables" in my 6th grade literature class. I am truly amazed by this film and it never ceases to amaze me. I've seen it several times over the years and it is truly a remarkable film.
The direction was brilliant, the casting was wonderful, and the overall production was absolutely astounding. I always remember the funny moment when Anne accidentally dyes her hair green or when she finds a rat in the rice pudding.
John Crombie and Megan Follows are wonderful in the title roles as Gilbert Blythe and Anne Shirley. This is a treat for yourself or for the whole family.
The direction was brilliant, the casting was wonderful, and the overall production was absolutely astounding. I always remember the funny moment when Anne accidentally dyes her hair green or when she finds a rat in the rice pudding.
John Crombie and Megan Follows are wonderful in the title roles as Gilbert Blythe and Anne Shirley. This is a treat for yourself or for the whole family.
A film for teachers who don't want to teach...
film-critic22 February 2008
"Anne of Green Gables" was one of those surprise random moments for me where I didn't know what to expect, but went through a barrage of emotion before arriving to this conclusion. In film, it may be cliché to say "size does matter", but with exploding budgets and timelines over 120 minutes, size is becoming a hot commodity in Hollywood. "Anne of Green Gables" is one of those low budget, little screen book adaptations that literally takes every page and puts it in cinematic lights. Carrying both positive and negative attributes, "Anne of Green Gables" takes three hours of your life, puts it in a made-for-TV blender, blends, and forces you to drink the resulting concoction. How does it taste going down? Don't worry that is what I am here for.
"Anne of Green Gables" begins with Anne's life in an orphanage, living with uncaring foster parents, all the way through her lavish life with her new parents, Matthew and Marilla Cuthbert. She goes through the struggles of being an independent woman living in a prim and proper world. Leading us as Anne is Megan Follows, a young girl with a television filled resume, who provides us with the shell of Anne, but not quite the full-body development. Follows is my first experience with Anne, and since there is little to judge, I must admit she was follow-able, but not quite developed. The words that she engulfed were charismatic, she defined the role, but when she walked, cried, or ran she didn't seem to be that same Anne again. Follows felt like a stage actress trapped in an invisible cinema box. Either she wasn't allowed the explore all the elements, or she just didn't have to. This film was your typical made-for-TV movie that didn't need actors escaping their shells because they had picturesque views and longevity on their side. They were telling a story, not winning awards and with this film it was obvious. Don't yell I did like what Follows did, I just didn't love her performance. Perhaps a stack rankings of all the others that portrayed Anne would allow Fellows' performance to stand out, but watching this film alone something just felt missing. Richard Farnsworth's Matthew was another abandoned character, with no emotion and void of life. Every time he opened his mouth, nothing of excitement protruded. Colleen Dewhurst was the cliché angry woman, unwilling to change, yet something about Anne eventually brings her to a new understanding of life. These two were the leading figures around Anne, and working together they provided a good story but poorly developed characters. There was minimal emotion surrounding them as they went from scene to scene. For these actors, it was obviously a job; they allowed the movie to tell the story.
Having never read the story of Anne and her adventures at Green Gables, director Kevin Sullivan should be commended for bringing such a drab story to life. The adventures of the protagonist Anne includes minimal excitement, the cliché drunken friend, the death of a loved one, the adolescent blurts of English all can be found in other films of this nature like "Little House on the Prairie" or any "After School Special", but Sullivan did bring some snippets of joy to this story. He made it long, which allowed us to sink into the environment, believe that it was forced, and yet one can find simple joys in the stagy-ness of it all. Sullivan's direction was impeccable; he took no risks, created nothing original, and played it by the book. He allowed the story to grow, but again, there wasn't much story to grow. Anne stays in one place, runs around everywhere, and grows an iconic challenge with a local boy who is equally as talented (and equally as drab). I am not a pre-teen girl, I am missing the "bosom" friend, and obviously this film wasn't targeted towards my demographic, but it should still entertain. Anyone who argues that they could sit through such lifeless characters must be first in line to the new Larry the Cable Guy film. While I am drawing random tangents, my point is the meat was missing from this adventure. The scenery was fantastic, the pacing was fluent, but our characters could not bring me to a second viewing. Where was the passion in this film? Why did Sullivan allow cardboard to grace his screen?
Overall, "Anne of Green Gables" was a lengthy film, with cardboard characters, but a plethora of beautiful scenes. There wasn't much music to talk about, outside of the same three chords played over and over again. Richard Farnsworth proved yet again that his name filled his resume, while Megan Follows played her part while keeping within her self-proclaimed box. As a reviewer of films, I want to see progression, development; strong single elements that make each film stand out from the cattle of the rest. With this film it felt safe, it was a family film that took no risks, it felt like a Styrofoam box on the ocean you really should take it out, but you worry about getting wet and sea creatures. "Anne of Green Gables" was an 80s film without the pizazz. If I had a daughter who wanted to watch this film, I could hope it would help her sleep. Coupled with the characters, the story is ironically bland, and even the director didn't push for risks. It was a film. I was happy when it was over, could never dream about watching it again, yet I can't fault it for anything dramatic. It wasn't the greatest made-for-TV film, but there is little to complain about.
It was sterile. It was cardboard. It was copper.
Grade: ** 1/2 out of *****
"Anne of Green Gables" begins with Anne's life in an orphanage, living with uncaring foster parents, all the way through her lavish life with her new parents, Matthew and Marilla Cuthbert. She goes through the struggles of being an independent woman living in a prim and proper world. Leading us as Anne is Megan Follows, a young girl with a television filled resume, who provides us with the shell of Anne, but not quite the full-body development. Follows is my first experience with Anne, and since there is little to judge, I must admit she was follow-able, but not quite developed. The words that she engulfed were charismatic, she defined the role, but when she walked, cried, or ran she didn't seem to be that same Anne again. Follows felt like a stage actress trapped in an invisible cinema box. Either she wasn't allowed the explore all the elements, or she just didn't have to. This film was your typical made-for-TV movie that didn't need actors escaping their shells because they had picturesque views and longevity on their side. They were telling a story, not winning awards and with this film it was obvious. Don't yell I did like what Follows did, I just didn't love her performance. Perhaps a stack rankings of all the others that portrayed Anne would allow Fellows' performance to stand out, but watching this film alone something just felt missing. Richard Farnsworth's Matthew was another abandoned character, with no emotion and void of life. Every time he opened his mouth, nothing of excitement protruded. Colleen Dewhurst was the cliché angry woman, unwilling to change, yet something about Anne eventually brings her to a new understanding of life. These two were the leading figures around Anne, and working together they provided a good story but poorly developed characters. There was minimal emotion surrounding them as they went from scene to scene. For these actors, it was obviously a job; they allowed the movie to tell the story.
Having never read the story of Anne and her adventures at Green Gables, director Kevin Sullivan should be commended for bringing such a drab story to life. The adventures of the protagonist Anne includes minimal excitement, the cliché drunken friend, the death of a loved one, the adolescent blurts of English all can be found in other films of this nature like "Little House on the Prairie" or any "After School Special", but Sullivan did bring some snippets of joy to this story. He made it long, which allowed us to sink into the environment, believe that it was forced, and yet one can find simple joys in the stagy-ness of it all. Sullivan's direction was impeccable; he took no risks, created nothing original, and played it by the book. He allowed the story to grow, but again, there wasn't much story to grow. Anne stays in one place, runs around everywhere, and grows an iconic challenge with a local boy who is equally as talented (and equally as drab). I am not a pre-teen girl, I am missing the "bosom" friend, and obviously this film wasn't targeted towards my demographic, but it should still entertain. Anyone who argues that they could sit through such lifeless characters must be first in line to the new Larry the Cable Guy film. While I am drawing random tangents, my point is the meat was missing from this adventure. The scenery was fantastic, the pacing was fluent, but our characters could not bring me to a second viewing. Where was the passion in this film? Why did Sullivan allow cardboard to grace his screen?
Overall, "Anne of Green Gables" was a lengthy film, with cardboard characters, but a plethora of beautiful scenes. There wasn't much music to talk about, outside of the same three chords played over and over again. Richard Farnsworth proved yet again that his name filled his resume, while Megan Follows played her part while keeping within her self-proclaimed box. As a reviewer of films, I want to see progression, development; strong single elements that make each film stand out from the cattle of the rest. With this film it felt safe, it was a family film that took no risks, it felt like a Styrofoam box on the ocean you really should take it out, but you worry about getting wet and sea creatures. "Anne of Green Gables" was an 80s film without the pizazz. If I had a daughter who wanted to watch this film, I could hope it would help her sleep. Coupled with the characters, the story is ironically bland, and even the director didn't push for risks. It was a film. I was happy when it was over, could never dream about watching it again, yet I can't fault it for anything dramatic. It wasn't the greatest made-for-TV film, but there is little to complain about.
It was sterile. It was cardboard. It was copper.
Grade: ** 1/2 out of *****
Super Super Super!!
Bookends11 April 1999
When I read these books as a child.. I would read an installment and then watch the installment on television. I have been in love with the stories ever since. The characters are truly the embodiment of L.M. Montgomery's written word. She would be proud.
I grew up wanting Gilbert Blythe to be in love with me and for Diana Barry to be my best friend. I think that this series was and is excellent.
If you like this one, make sure to watch the sequel. It is a little more romantic and a little less adventurous, but aren't we all when we grow up??
I grew up wanting Gilbert Blythe to be in love with me and for Diana Barry to be my best friend. I think that this series was and is excellent.
If you like this one, make sure to watch the sequel. It is a little more romantic and a little less adventurous, but aren't we all when we grow up??
Some people just don't get it. DO get it ... you'll love it!
rogulus21 July 2006
If you already know the story, then there's a very good chance you'll love this movie. It's a reasonably faithful adaptation of the novel. Purists might have reason to complain about the liberties that were taken and they would have a point. But all in all the producers done Lucy Maud Montgomery proud.
If you don't know the story and you're trying to figure out if you'll like this movie, don't go by what some reviewers are complaining about it. They might say that the script was horrible, that the characters spout Shakespearean lines in totally inappropriate situations.
What they don't get is that the young Anne Shirley is characterized as being heavily influenced by the literature she reads. She reacts to the misery in her life by losing herself in the romance of the works by the great literary masters. She sees tragedy on a grand scale where somebody else might see a moderate inconvenience. She's _supposed_ to overreact to things, because she's an impressionable young girl who projects the grandness of literature into her own humdrum life. The entire charm of the story comes in seeing how this poor girl interacts with the people around her with intelligence and with imagination -- perhaps TOO MUCH intelligence and imagination -- to the point of appearing to the "normal" townsfolk as being a weirdo, and of how the others come to appreciate her ways and how she learns how to deal with the real world.
Present that story in a package full of beautiful scenery, delightful performances, and a wonderful score and you've got the makings of a thoroughly entertaining movie.
I'll concur a bit on the comments about the acting. Some of the minor parts weren't acted very convincingly. But that's a small quibble. The major roles and most of the supporting roles were perfectly cast and perfectly executed.
Get to know the story for what it is and you're in for a treat. Young and old, male and female (I'm a male in my late thirties) ... just being a human being with feelings and with an appreciation for the beautiful little things in life should qualify you as a Kindred Spirit.
Get it. You'll love it!
My rating: 10/10 (take away a few points for a few of its flaws but put them right back in because of its overall charm)
If you don't know the story and you're trying to figure out if you'll like this movie, don't go by what some reviewers are complaining about it. They might say that the script was horrible, that the characters spout Shakespearean lines in totally inappropriate situations.
What they don't get is that the young Anne Shirley is characterized as being heavily influenced by the literature she reads. She reacts to the misery in her life by losing herself in the romance of the works by the great literary masters. She sees tragedy on a grand scale where somebody else might see a moderate inconvenience. She's _supposed_ to overreact to things, because she's an impressionable young girl who projects the grandness of literature into her own humdrum life. The entire charm of the story comes in seeing how this poor girl interacts with the people around her with intelligence and with imagination -- perhaps TOO MUCH intelligence and imagination -- to the point of appearing to the "normal" townsfolk as being a weirdo, and of how the others come to appreciate her ways and how she learns how to deal with the real world.
Present that story in a package full of beautiful scenery, delightful performances, and a wonderful score and you've got the makings of a thoroughly entertaining movie.
I'll concur a bit on the comments about the acting. Some of the minor parts weren't acted very convincingly. But that's a small quibble. The major roles and most of the supporting roles were perfectly cast and perfectly executed.
Get to know the story for what it is and you're in for a treat. Young and old, male and female (I'm a male in my late thirties) ... just being a human being with feelings and with an appreciation for the beautiful little things in life should qualify you as a Kindred Spirit.
Get it. You'll love it!
My rating: 10/10 (take away a few points for a few of its flaws but put them right back in because of its overall charm)
A Perfect Movie
djbrkns19 April 2002
A phenomenal piece of work. Unbelievably good. Beautiful in every way imaginable, acting, cinematography, scripting, editing. As I watch (over and over), I am in awe of each of these elements of the film. The flow and transitions between scenes is impeccable. In what other family movie can you have one of your favorite characters die off, smile at the beauty of the scene, and transition right back into the story without missing a beat. This movie has it all. All the harshness of life, overcoming adversity, romance without so much as a kiss...
I must say that some of the supporting actors where too over the top for my liking, but by putting them in any scene with Megan Follows or Colleen Dewhurst all enjoyment is restored. That says so much about these two actresses. Add in Richard Farnsworth and you will never find a better lead cast... past, present or future. Megan Follows portrayal of Anne Shirely, from the side profile image of her face, to the delivery of the extreme fluctuations of emotions and dialog should go down as the #1 performance in history that will never be topped. Beautiful scenery... A perfect movie(10/10).
I must say that some of the supporting actors where too over the top for my liking, but by putting them in any scene with Megan Follows or Colleen Dewhurst all enjoyment is restored. That says so much about these two actresses. Add in Richard Farnsworth and you will never find a better lead cast... past, present or future. Megan Follows portrayal of Anne Shirely, from the side profile image of her face, to the delivery of the extreme fluctuations of emotions and dialog should go down as the #1 performance in history that will never be topped. Beautiful scenery... A perfect movie(10/10).
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
