FC Barcelona Confidential (TV Movie 2004) Poster

(2004 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Worth seeing for the access and insight it provides
bob the moo29 June 2005
FC Barcelona is the biggest football club in the world. Its 102,000 shareholder members all have seats at the Nou Camp, Europe's biggest stadium and the right, every four years, to elect the Club President the dream job for thousands of ambitious, patriotic Catalans. In 2003, thanks to poor domestic performances and a spiralling debt, the club sank into the worst crisis in its 100 year history. With the promise of root and branch reform, a new regime was ushered in under the leadership of the charismatic Joan Laporta. With unprecedented and exclusive access, directors Webster and Hernandez spent a year at the Nou Camp documenting the new boards efforts to turn an old fashioned Catalan family affair into a global football business.

With cameras in the boardroom, commentary boxes, director's homes and even sitting in on contract negotiations with big name players, it is impossible to ignore this film for the opportunities it gives to get inside a football club. Can you imagine the same level of access being given by Man Utd, Chelsea or any of the English big clubs? No, neither could I, which is why I tuned into this. Although Barcalona is far from being like the English clubs, this is still a very interesting film. Barca have similar problems to most clubs but their management structure is much different and they have problems with fan violence that put one in mind of the English fans of a decade ago (or more). It is the management side that the film comes from: following Laporta and his team as they try to move past the old regime at the club and move the club into more of a modern, solvent, global business. This side of things is interesting and, as I said, the level of access is impressive and simply by being a fly on the wall there are countless insights into the backroom of the club. At the same time we also see the contract dealings, the pressures on results and the oxymoron that is football financial planning – the directors sweat every point and their plans are based on results that are in the hands of the gods.

The film only touches on the "Mad Boys" once or twice but it does this wisely since these thugs are a film in their own right. Their violent streak is shown clearly though and it must be a totally frustrating for the directors to have to cope with these "fans" costing "their" club money in fines, lost revenues, negative publicity and matches played behind closed doors etc. Like I said, these thugs could easily have a whole film about them and their unsavoury "support" but here we only see how they affect the running of a club – death threats, violent attacks on directors and property damage; all against a board that turned the club around, won titles and greatly improved the financial stability of the club. Overall, although I would prefer to see this same film made with English clubs, this was still a great film and the issue relevancy to me became less important as the film went on. The almost total access and the frank, honest presentation is fascinating viewing and fans of big clubs the world should try and get a chance to see this.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Do I not like this
paul2001sw-112 March 2009
You might think that a fly-on-the-wall documentary about a football club would be interesting; particularly a club like Barcelona, whose directors are directly elected by its members. But this is a disappointing film, its brief clips of the board (or indeed the team) in action do nothing to illuminate their real personalities, views or motivations; instead we get a lot of PR, as the people concerned tell the wider world (or sometimes the viewer directly) how committed they are to fixing all problems and ensuring that the club emerges triumphant. There are some good potential stories - the new board first removing its predecessors, then falling out among itself; the poor start but strong recovery of the new manager; but there's no tension in the structure of the documentary, which in English has the most deadpan of narrations (though it's quite an extensive narration, because too little real dialogue of interest is captured to make sense by itself). And certain fiascoes (like the David Beckham "signing") aren't even mentioned. The result is an unexciting film in which men in suits blow their own trumpets, and not much more.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed