"Law & Order" Custody (TV Episode 1996) Poster

(TV Series)

(1996)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Deadly biology
TheLittleSongbird17 February 2021
The subject matter immediately is enough to grab the attention. It is a very sensitive and difficult topic to discuss, and if anybody has doubts about whether the execution would be tactful enough without being preachy, one-sided and too heavy that is understandable (those are common traps with this kind of topic and similar). Anybody though that has always admired how 'Law and Order' approached tough subjects and how it did so will be intrigued.

"Custody" is a great episode that does extremely well with one of Season 6's toughest subjects. There was a general slump in quality between "Blood Libel" and this (with the exception of "Trophy") where the episodes ranged between mixed feelings and decent with big problems, but "Custody" was a near-return to form for the season. It was very interesting to see Paul Robinette again, though strange to see him without Ben Stone and on the defense rather than the prosecution.

Will admit though to preferring him on the prosecution side, more balanced and perceptive as well as more realistic. My initial feelings on hearing his argument raised my eyebrows slightly (though not near as much as the defense argument in "Remand") and my thoughts were he was a lot more balanced and smarter in the early seasons.

As "Custody" goes on however and the more the debate is delved deeper into, his point of view actually didn't seem as bad as it came over initially. Much prefer him as a prosecutor though.

In spite of that criticism, which will come over as a nit-pick to some, "Custody" is highly successful everywhere else. The production values are solid and the intimacy of the photography doesn't get static or too filmed play-like. The music when used is not too over-emphatic and has a melancholic edge that is quite haunting. The direction is sympathetic enough without being leaden, while having enough momentum to make the drama sing in its atmosphere.

Script is very thoughtful, and despite having a lot of (thankfully still interesting) talk it doesn't ramble. The story came over as very intense and moving, that handles one of the season's most difficult topics sensitively yet also harrowingly. The policing scenes are entertaining and gritty with great chemistry but it's the legal side where the episode really delivers. The performances are on point, particularly from a truly powerful Amber Kain.

Summarising, great. 9/10
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Coding By Color.
rmax30482322 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It's a superior episode because it deals with a controversial and contemporary subject that has no easy answer. The division between right and wrong is fuzzy. Some of the performances are particularly good, and the law doesn't always win.

Amber Kain plays a young black mother who was a solipsistic crack addict when she gave birth and for eighteen months neglected the most basic needs of her child. Picked up by the police, she's sent to rehab and the baby is adopted by a white family who dote on her.

When Kain is released she's clean and wants her baby back. She enlists the help of her boyfriend and a man is killed. She kidnaps the baby, makes a fake ransom call to the adoptive parents, and is nabbed as she's about to leave with the baby and live with a relative out of state.

Waterston and Hennessy try her for felony murder -- a killing that took place in the course of committing the kidnapping. Richard Brooks, as Paul Robinette, the former ADA, is brought in for the defense. And what a defense! "Cross-racial adoption is a form of genocide." That position, incidentally, makes me guilty of trying to exterminate the South Koreans.

The agency tries to place kids with families of their own race but it's not always possible because so many abandoned children are black and so many of the eligible families are white. Therefore, many black children wind up being adopted by middle-class white families.

Kain claims that she kidnapped the baby on the street when she was overcome by a maternal impulse, but there is evidence that she'd planned the whole deal weeks ahead of time, that she'd quit her job, and that what appeared to be nurturance was self indulgence. Of course the real issue, as it so often is, is race. Will the child be raised in a white family, a square peg in a round hole, materially comfortable but spiritually in conflict? Or will he be raised by an erratic young mother in an impoverished environment just so that black culture can be perpetuated? Nobody knows what's right. The experts don't know. Brooks puts a black expert on the stand who claims that black children adopted by white families grow into troubled adults, but much of the scientific evidence seems to contradict him. The National Association of Black Social Workers opposes cross-racial adoption. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People supports it. Nobody knows, not even the jury.

The usual cast is up to its usual high standard. As Defense Counsel, Richard Brooks seems more animated than he did as a prosecutor. And especially notable is the performance of Amber Kain as the ex crack-addicted and manipulative mother. It's a nicely done turn in a part that could easily have been flubbed by someone with a lesser talent.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Melodramatic Moments Mar an Otherwise Thoughtful Episode
bkkaz14 June 2022
America does not like to talk about racism. No, I'm not referring to all the performative dancing around about it, where we acknowledge some people do and say bad things or that there are historical events that clearly demonstrate the vile, barbaric ways people have been treated because of their race by others. I'm talking about racism, the institutionalized forms of prejudice based on race.

See, many Americans believe racism is not so wide or deep but merely the one-on-one moments when one person says or does something evil to someone of a different race. In being that reductive, it allows society to dodge the harder questions. After all, if it's just individuals, what can you do? But if it's society -- if there's an overwhelming force of racism that puts minorities at the mercy of the majority, some of who may not directly do anything racist but nonetheless benefit from the power it gives to their race -- that means everyone has some responsibility.

This episode does just that. It challenges the notion that racism has nothing to do with crime unless the criminal signs an affidavit that they attacked someone of a different race because of their race. It challenges the notion that lawyers, judges, and juries don't see plaintiffs and defendants through a racial lens -- that somehow despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, people come into a courtroom (or any room) with exactly zero racial prejudices or stereotypes.

The only real problem with this episode is that it sometimes leans a bit too much on melodrama, with characters who operate more as types to make the point. Paul Robinette, for instance, returns as a defense lawyer and at times gives speeches that run contrary to his cooler and more reserved persona when he was one of the ADAs. Yes, people change, but not that much, and if anything, portraying the cerebral Robinette -- one of the best ADAs the show ever had -- as a now angry Black man seems to opposite of what his arc would be. Given his experience, Robinette should be even more reserved.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Death of a bureaucrat
bkoganbing27 August 2020
A man who worked for the city child welfare agency is found sabbed to death in Central Park. He was far from the most honest character ever to work for the city. In fact during their investigation Jerry Orbach and Benjamin Bratt discover he had a sweet little racket going.

But what got him killed was a successful attempt by Amber Kain, once a bad crack addict to locate the crack addicted baby son that was taken from her.

Defending Kain is former ADA Richard Brooks now as he puts it a black lawyer as opposed to being a lawyer who is black. Brooks makes the case all about race as Kain and her boyfriend accomplice have kidnapped the kid from the white parents.

Sam Waterston has his hands full keeping the trial about homicide as Brooks wants to make it about race.

It's an interesting conclusion that is arrived at.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible double standard.
m-4782628 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Stop lying people, if the girl were a white crackhead, who gave up her kid for adoption, there would be no hesitation. Guilty on all charges. Murder and kidnapping, which the accused was clearly more than just an accomplice of. It was infuriating watching everyone walking on egg shells, picking words and trying not to be too offensive. When the lawyer of the opposed party didn't hold back, and indulged in inflammatory pleas. Law and Order is a really good legal drama, a little too repetitive and frustrating sometimes, but good regardless. Better than the spinoff series even. However, being set in the US, some of the trials are painful to watch, with all the rules preventing lawyers to get the truth during the cross examination. In this episode in particular, every time McCoy was on to something, the lady judge stopped him, and this awful woman walked with a generous offer. Great acting as usual, I really love the mid-90s cast.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Comment on cast members
demondrvf4116 April 2006
Law & Order Cast I have watched this program since day one. At one point in time, the show was on 4 times a day. I watched them all. Rating: (E)-Excellent;(VG)-Very Good;(G)-Good;(F)-Fair;(P)-Poor

G George Dzundza: He was good on the program, but if you can't

pronounce the name.....

F Chris Noth: Too damn pretty to be a NYPD Detective. He is better

on Criminal Intent.

F Michael Moriarty: Kind of whiny with a lot of power VG Paul Sarvino: He's Paul Sarvino, they don't get any better.

F Richard Brooks: Boring with only one facial expression

E Jerry Orbach: Loved this guy. Never know he was a song and dance

man.

G Dann Florek: Liked him then, like him now on SVU

E Epatha Merkerson: Liked her since her first time on the show.

E Benjamin Bratt: Great actor, very convincing.

G Carey Lowell: She made a better Defense Lawyer

E Angie Harmon: Love this girl, sorry she left the show. VG Sam Waterston: Enjoy his delivery and acting ability.

P Elisabeth Rohm: Could not stand this girl.

P Dianne Wiest: See above, except more

G Steven Hill: Very good in this part, sorry he left.

E Fred Dalton Thompson: I have liked this guy in everything he has

done.

E Dennis Farina: Same as Paul Sarvino, but better.
6 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed