The Disappearance of Susan Cox Powell (TV Mini Series 2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A solid, if somewhat pedestrian, overview of a case involving psychological abuse, sexual obsession, and murder
Bertaut8 April 2020
Sometime between 5:00pm on December 6, 2009 and 8:00am on December 7, 28-year-old mother of two Susan Powell disappeared from the home she shared with her husband Josh and their children in West Valley City, Utah. She remains missing to this day, no one has ever been charged in connection with the crime, and although the case is still officially open, West Valley Police Department (WVPD) declared it cold in May 2013. It's generally assumed that Susan was murdered and disposed of by Josh (by 2009, their marriage was falling apart), but her exact fate is unknown. He was declared a person of interest within hours of her being reported missing and was the only suspect the police ever had, although he doggedly maintained his innocence despite a wealth of circumstantial evidence. However, as anybody who knows anything about this case will tell you, this brief overview of the main facts doesn't even begin to hint at the dark underbelly - which includes porn, stalking, sexual obsession, the secret filming of minors, domestic abuse, financial control, religious hatred, and some of the worst music you've ever heard in your life.

Created, executive produced, and directed by James Buddy Day and hosted by Stephanie Bauer, The Disappearance of Susan Cox Powell, which aired on Oxygen in North America and Sky Crime in the UK and Ireland, is a fine introduction to the subject, although it had the somewhat unfortunate luck of airing right in the middle of Cold: Susan Powell Case Files - The Untold Story, an exhaustively researched and staggeringly comprehensive podcast by Dave Cawley, an investigative reporter for KSL NewsRadio in Salt Lake City, Utah. And although I think unilateral comparisons between the show and the podcast are a little unfair (the two-part show is under four hours, whereas the podcast is over 20, and that's not counting the various Facebook Live Q&As, the live show, and various other releases), certainly, if you've already listened to Cold, you'll find very little of interest in Disappearance (except for the presence of one, admittedly important, interviewee). Going in the other direction though, if you know little about the case, Disappearance is a very decent overview and introduction. It's got some noticeable aesthetic problems and makes a few rather ridiculous claims, but it's comprehensive, clear, and inclusive.

The person who appears here who isn't in Cold is Alina Powell, Josh's sister. Unlike his estranged sister Jennifer Graves, Alina is convinced of her brother's innocence and maintains that the police painted her father Steve's actions in an overly negative light (Steve was obsessed with Susan to the point of filming her without her knowledge and literally going through her trash, keeping such things as toenail clippings and panties. In 2011, he was imprisoned on unrelated charges of voyeurism, and in 2014 of being in possession of child porn). Her involvement is the one thing the show has over Cold, if for no other reason than it shows the lengths of self-deception to which people are willing to go to defend loved ones. Alina believes that Susan led Steve on, referring to "the version of Susan that the cops don't want the world to see" (a "version" which not a single other person corroborates). She also refers to the police investigations into Susan's disappearance as a "harassment campaign to damage our family that we'll never recover from". She has the second part right.

On that subject, the show does a good job of establishing just how screwed up the Powell family was. One of the first things we hear Steve say is, "she's the most beautiful thing that ever walked the earth", and later he states, "God, I worship her. She just turns me on. I'm in a perpetual state of turned on when she's around". Remember, this is a 58-year-old man talking about his then 26-year-old daughter-in-law as he secretly films her - a man so delusional that he convinces himself that Susan knows he's filming, and when she reaches down to scratch her leg as she gets into her car, she's actually 'performing' for his camera. And the creepiness of the songs he recorded (under the name Steve Chantrey) is matched only by how laughably bad they are.

It's not just Steve that the show paints in a negative light, however. Josh is portrayed as a control freak unable to see any opinion but his own. Judy Cox, Susan's mother recalls a particular conversation with Susan prior to her marrying Josh; "I said, "go out and date like crazy for a couple of years and have fun." And she goes, "well, what about Josh?" I looked at her, and I said, "I'm sorry Susan, I look at Josh and I see darkness." Later in the first episode, we hear that Susan told her friend Tara Allred, "this is not the man I married", and that Josh had told her, "over my dead body will you leave me."

The show also looks at the perceived failure of the police. Not only was Josh never charged for Susan's disappearance, he was never even arrested, and Steve's later arrest stemmed from unrelated charges. The show explains that WVPD's decision not to arrest Josh was partly tactical (they wanted to leave him on the street in the hopes he might lead them to solid evidence), and partly because the DA recognised how easily their litany of circumstantial evidence could have been dismantled by a defence lawyer (not only was there no body, but the police were unable to say where, how, or even if Susan had been murdered). Reading about the case online can be infuriating in terms of what seems like police ineptitude, and although I think the show lets him off too lightly, lead detective Ellis Maxwell explaining some of the decisions helps to put the whole thing in a better context.

We also examine the emotional fallout from Susan's disappearance, especially in relation to Allred, who is an emotional wreck, clearly missing her best friend, but also clearly blaming herself for not attempting to save her. In a story in which the Powells are almost pantomime villains, it's easy to forget these are real people, but the interviews with Allred pack a real emotional wallop and are probably the show's strongest moments.

In terms of problems, the show makes several inaccurate claims. For one, it claims that Alina's interview is the first time she has spoken publically about the case. It isn't - she's given numerous interviews over the years. The show also claims to have unearthed previously unknown evidence (an audio recording of Steve confessing his love to Susan). However, it wasn't unknown. In actual fact, it was discovered by Cawley during the making of Cold, who made it public seven months before Disappearance aired.

Elsewhere, there are some rather ill-advised aesthetic choices. For example, the show has the habit of repeating the same bit of information multiple times; we hear the original 911 call reporting Susan missing on the morning of December 7, for instance, and then, not two minutes later, we hear the same call again for no apparent reason. Every time the show comes back from an ad break, it recaps what was said before the break, which is not only unnecessary, it's distracting and irritating. There is also an omnipresent generic soundtrack running throughout the entire show - as far as I can remember, the music never stops once. And, of course, when compared to Cold, the show is very simplistic and rudimentary. However, as mentioned above, I don't really feel it's an entirely fair comparison - Cold was designed to be exhaustive, Disappearance was designed to be introductory. And that's exactly what it is.

Problems notwithstanding, I enjoyed The Disappearance of Susan Cox Powell. It provides an excellent starting point for anyone interested in the case, and although, despite its claims, there's nothing revelatory here, it introduces the main characters and gives a solid overview of events.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Stephanie Bauer is Excellent... But:
Pro_Viewer7 May 2019
Once again Stephanie Bauer did an excellent job, but the editing is so bad at times I was considering turning it off. I understand trying to build tension and excitement, but the editing was so bad, it gives the story away before the ending. Why? The story was very sad and the family was creepy so there was no need to edit that way. For the Editors: Justin Barclay, Addison McCoubrey, Dave Rehm, and Dan Fouts... Someone should have reviewed the show and fixed it before it's release! It's almost as bad as the editing of The Curse of Oak Island.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Podcast is way better
deadendken4 June 2019
Has some useful insights, but I consider it more supplementary to the "Cold" Podcast that came out earlier this year. They provide a lot more context than this documentary does and they go way deeper into Josh's story.

For all of you who feel the need to criticize Susan for her behavior towards Steve, it's clear that she was being naive, nothing more. Was it "good" behavior? Maybe not, but she clearly didn't think that's Steve was going to become obsessed with her about it and when he confessed his love for her, she was obviously not at all happy about it and practically avoided him like the devil from then on. It's always easy to criticize when we actually know what happened, but she didn't have that luxury.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sad and disturbing tale
evening16 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
There were many signs of foreboding in this notorious case from the pristine state of Utah.

A young couple marries shortly after meeting. The father-in-law behaves seductively and obsessively toward the wife, recording thousands of videos and hoarding some of her most personal effects. After years, the wife begins to wonder about her legal options, but remains in the home. Then, after she disappears, the husband manages to have alone time with their two young sons.

Judging by this two-part documentary from the Oxygen Channel, egregious problems existed for years within the family of attractive and loving mom Susan Cox Powell. She remained in the situation until the night she disappeared; her husband said he took their two young boys camping in freezing conditions around midnight.

Along with Ms. Powell, whose body has never been found, four people in the extended family ended up dead, including Susan's sons, found with their hands linked in the rubble of a house fire.

We learn here that every nine seconds, a woman suffers from domestic violence, and that one in three women around the world has been the victim of an assault or worse. This shocking documentary is a call to arms.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Oxygen at it's finest.
rdoubleoc6 May 2019
I had never heard of this case before now, but have watched a lot of Oxygen's real-life crime shows, and this one was just as good.

They do a really good job of showing the whole picture (the thing news articles don't really do a good job of). Instead of reading countless news articles on the subject, it's better to just wait for Oxygen to do their job and make few-hour documentary on the topic, and then watch that.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Whodunit Murder Doc
dansandini1 October 2019
Expands and explodes in all sorts of unsuspecting ways. Good detective work by the series producers. Good "slow unveil" by the screenwriters. I really recommend this one which I found on YouTube.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Job!
ricewithaspoon9 May 2019
I've seen probably ...really every show about this case and i could say this covers the whole thing in the best possible way.. given what we know... regarding evidence. one reviewer criticised the editing asking why the story was given away before the end?.. which i don't understand...? it actually followed the timeline. i liked that. and i liked that it was, to 99% probably, made out of original footage - meaning no reenactments.

totally recommended
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Dump cops
bowedeclan6 November 2019
So thecops has josh in for questioning and he is chief suspect, so of course u question him then release him and tail him? I could not believe my ears when the cop on the show said well he rents a car and clocks over 800 miles but we don't know where he went, how stupid can u get why did they not follow him? Bad police work, lazy
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Fascinating story, garbage documentary.
kjlewis-980285 November 2019
A 3hr long mess that could've easily been cut in half by these filmmakers, or doubled in length by competent storytellers. The story is dense, yet this documentary fails to dig past the surface, instead repeating the same 5 second clips over and over, and focussing way too much on the female journalist who clearly loves her own airtime.

On top of that, it covers parts of the timeline more than once - for no reason - and reveals way too much too early, eradicating any sense of tension or surprise and making it impossible for any respectable armchair detective to really get into it.

Utter, utter garbage.
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ruined by filmmakers
axlpaulo3 April 2020
As other reviewers have said, the presenter completely spoils this heartbreaking story with her obsession of making sure she is the centre of attention. There is absolutely no reason why we should see you at all in this. Some clips, seriously repeated 10 times, it felt like 10 x 20 minute episodes had been stitched together. Just a very poor documentary about a sad story. They should've handed it over to professionals to produce.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Waste of time. Listen to "Cold" instead.
sydswarts-8447619 June 2019
I literally never write reviews but this was such a terrible documentary. They did a terrible job with this story and showed the same clips over and over again. The podcast "Cold" does a much better job and would be a better use of your time!!!
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Shocking story, shocking production
n-barnes12 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The story told is beyond tragic and touched me, the input form the relatives and law enforcement officers is heart-wrenching. Unfortunately, the way in which the story is presented is as poor as anything I have seen on television. The "investigative journalist" jumped to so many conclusions without evidence that I lost count and I cringed every time she came on screen. Someone should tell her that we are adults and can form our own conclusions when presented with evidence (or in this case and through no fault of law enforcement, a lack of evidence). Despite her claims (and as any journalist worth their salt would tell you) there will never be a "definitive account" of what happened to Susan Cox Powell. The content used was repetitive beyond belief with the same clips of interviews and home video being used over and over again. I am no longer five years of age, I do not need to be told / shown the same information time and time again so that I retain it. The film was sad on so many levels, not least that the relatives and law enforcement officers were flush with sincerity, authenticity and integrity whereas the production was not.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
An interesting case incredibly badly recounted
hjorose29 February 2020
This could have been much more effectively and intelligently told in a quarter of the time to make a stronger statement in support of abuse victims. Countless unnecessary recaps, terrible editing and numerous jumps around the timeline in the name of unachieved suspense are presented by a director and production team who will hopefully find different careers now. Jenn Oxborrow's contributions are the highlight that gain it some stars.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One sided
heaze9 November 2019
It's clear Josh and his father were involved. It's also clear there both creepy AF. Even the way they talk, they would creep out a blind person. So what does that say about Susan, she dated, married, and had 2 children with him. So there had to be another side to her they made sure not to show or comment on. Also the detectives with the talking about and quick accusations about him talking about his hands means he strangled her. If he farted in that interview, I guarantee the detective would say. "He farted to throw me off the scent". Everyone who watches Dateline or 60 minutes knows the spouse is the 1st suspect. And they will try there best to maneuver and twist your story to make it fit their theory. And you will be prosecuted and found guilty on circumstantial evidence only. It's unfortunate if my spouse went missing I would be apprehensive to speak to police worried about spending life in prison even if innocent and at the same time worried about doing everything I can to find my wife. Your caught between a rock and a hard place. The new thinking in cases like this would be to immediately get an attorney before even doing the initial interview, to protect yourself and your family, and force police to look at other suspects and get the real story. The wort part was the sister Jessica Graves lol. She was like the obese and fugly version of Veronica Mars. Iam all for justice, even if my family were the culprits but I would never go as far as totally betraying and trying to put my family away for life myself. That is a beyond hateful act, that takes a certain twisted mentality to attempt something like that. She has some deep seeded issues when it comes to her Dad and siblings. Possibly warranted to a degree, but I just smh when I saw that. My theory which is as good as anyone else's. Is that Alina did it in a fit of rage and the family covered it up for her. I noticed how angry she got talking about the attention the father gave Susan. She blamed Susan for her dads sexual predatory deviance. She blamed everything on others to protect her father. There was an opedus type relationship, like she was in love with her father in a intimate way.
2 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ruins its own ending
AJWo904 November 2020
The show starts with an intro (why?!) that spoils the end of the show (why?!)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Police were normal, wife's family and husbands family were crazy
ravensuper5 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The double sided coins of review on these series occasionally hurt the credibility of the case. They never met a suspect they didn't think was guilty which given their field is normal to some degree. Problem is it kept jumping from person to person in this case first the husband, then his dad, then his brother. Sure they had reason and good reason to think he did it but they kept coming up with a empty sack. Empty massive searches, empty caves and mines, cars with no evidence, computers with no evidence. The wives father basically was more of a hindrance then help. He seemed to show up everywhere he cost his grandkids their life like Reno did the kids of Waco. Someone has to be the adult has to know their dealing with a unstable flawed man influenced by a sick lunatic father. Sometimes rocking the boat to get a slip up results in that crazy man jumping over the edge. If investigators can't figure out the encrypted hard drives sometimes you need to hire the hackers to figure it out. Professional computer people are always 3 steps behind the hackers. It showed here they showed a female in the role of IT tech and another scene simulated here 6-8 years later. Obviously the people they had on the job were useless. As they kept chasing leads ending in goose eggs the real answer lies in the encryption. Sure the judge should have done more but their faces with endless accusations of this parent will do X stop this ad infinity. So her dad on his list of endless suspects eventually blames the cops the same people sending teams into desert caves. No dad your also to blame for those kids dying in the end the real victims were the kids and the wive. I don't feel the slightest for her lunatic father sometimes cops just need to tell caring parents to butt out of a investigation or face a jail cell your impeding this investigation.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed