Ghost Adventures (TV Series) Kells Pub/Butterworth Building (Seattle, WA) (2010) User Reviews

response to readerguy. I just have to.

[ravndal15 · 7/10 · 9 January 2011]

I was reading what you had to say with interest . And actually was considering your view on the pub in question. But once you started showing hatred and disbelief in the hosts themselves and have no factual evidence on there so called false equipment. I had decided to disregard your comments in full. I always throw someones badmouthed comments about another away when they repeatedly accuse everything about them . Obviously you had intentions on showing your criticism of the show which is fine. And your believing in someones story who you know when in fact frankly.None of us here have any evidence of your story or proof of what you say. Only the words we read from you. I am open to hear your opinion in proof and will eat my words if your wrong. Please provide some forms of evidence about the so called professor etc. This will confirm your blatant accusations and put my mind to rest about the honesty in the show. I have only come to see that whenever there is a paranormal investigation show there seems to be a swamping of critics who claim to be able to defraud the show for what it is. But in honesty there evidence themselves(debunk lol)is not visible. Its usually only listening to what comes out there mouth and they speak it with acute demonstration. Bring on the evidence please because that's what its all about. Factual scientific evidence. Or Paranormal. I am just writing this review to let people see that one must not be influenced by critics. I do hope IMDb put this up for people to read because its very insulting for us people who do like the show and believe in it to be insulted in something we believe in

I know the site in this episode well. Unconvincing, comical, dumb!

[readerguy · 1/10 · 7 January 2011]

This episode, as are most in this series, is just pure fiction and, frankly, a fraud. I know the Butterworth family that owns the building highlighted in this series (they are still in the funeral business), and one of the family members told me that when they saw this program they just broke into laughter. I have lived in Seattle for 25 years, and I actually spent a great deal of time in the building directly adjacent to this very building. I also spent a fair amount of time at Kells Irish Pub that is the focus of this episode. I never heard any of these silly "ghost" stories (except once or twice in a totally joking sense) until they appeared in this very weak episode. I can only guess the owners of Kells agreed to this unbelievable episode because of desire for publicity (or as a practical joke). Maybe business there is down and they need some attention?? I also learned from a University of Washington professor of Electrical Engineering that the Ghost Adventures' so-called high-tech "ghost detecting" instruments are totally invalid scientifically and "makebelieve for the sake of entertainment." Electromagnetic ghost voice detectors, infrared spirit detectors! Ha Ha Ha. And did you notice that the "images" and "voices" in this episode (as usual) are totally indiscernible until our 3 all-knowing paranormal-wise ghost-buster gurus kindly decipher them for us and display (in subtitles) where the spooks are (very fuzzy images at best) and what the spooks are "saying" (always extremely poor quality, very blurred audio). They spotted a vision of "a small child" that looked much more like a gingerbread boy or a Chewbacca doll. As usual in this series, the "evidence" is totally unconvincing and almost comical. And the 3 dudes that try push this BS onto us viewers are also extremely bad actors, like kids in a junior high school play. Soooo weak.