(TV Series)

(2023)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Much changed, but still very watchable.
Sleepin_Dragon14 May 2023
Doctor Neville Dupayne is killed in quite brutal fashion, soon after his brother Marcus and sister Caroline failed to convince him to renew the lease on the family's museum. DS Miskin is still coming to terms with the shooting.

Interesting choice, to have this much later book at this stage in the run, but when you consider the quality of source material, these great books can easily be changed to fit a different time.

Lots of changes to the original story, I feel they the focus was quite deliberately changed, but on the whole it works quite well.

Very atmospheric, it definitely has that Endeavour vibe to it, it looks marvellous, it's a gorgeous production, maybe not as good as the first two from this series, but still a very fine watch.

Father Brown fans learned why Mrs McCarthy had vanished from Kembleford, a fine cast here including Cusack, Anastasia Hille and Sylvester Le Touzel were both very good.

Despite the book being quite heavily changed, I really rather enjoyed it.

8/10.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Disappointing 2nd adoption
victoriajayne-3328014 May 2023
The book was set in 2003 so why push it back to the 70s ? These are lavish adoptions but in my humble a grave error not to do the books in order as the lead characters change so much over the decades which the writers have utterly failed to acknowledge...and while I like Bertie Cavill in this part he brings out that Adam is very stylish and elegant both physically and mentally he suffers from not being able to move him along including his later and slowly drawn out love interests ...yup na Martin Shaw in comparison utterly nailed bringing to life the written word ..also the writers totally managed the plot !
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Murder Room - Part 1
Prismark1012 June 2023
When the Murder Room was televised by the BBC almost 20 years ago starring Martin Shaw. I noted that the adaptation was disappointing. My biggest issue was Shaw's Dalgliesh was just a generic detective.

This one was more like it. The Dupayne Museum is a small private museum with its own murder room with exhibits from real life criminal cases.

Neville Dupayne is one of the trustees and a NHS psychiatrist. He is at odds with his brother Marcus and sister Caroline about renewing the lease for the museum to keep it open.

Later that night his body is found inside a burning car by the housekeeper Tally Clutton who was knocked off her bike earlier on.

DS Daniel Tarrant thinks the gardener, Ryan is the killer. Maybe egged on by the housekeeper to save their jobs and prevent the museum from shutting.

Dalgliesh suddenly finds himself under pressure from the top. Leading him to think that someone has something to hide. He also needs to consider his own future after being nominated for a literary prize.

Interestingly The Murder Room was published in 2003, so the Shaw version was set in the present day. It works just as well in the period mid 1970s setting. It actually gives it more atmosphere.

Aided with two deaths that mimic those in the murder room. Once again Tarrant draws the short straw as the clothead. It is Dalgliesh and Miskin who are more nuanced.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Missing an important ongoing character
SunnyDaise12 May 2023
This episode is okish as a TV show, but it doesn't feel true to the time setting plus an important ongoing character in not present. I was expecting such an omission though as this TV series is not following the order of the books (The Murder Room is one of the later stories, but only the 6th in this run). Obviously that makes any recurring characters is problematic, especially when the novel they are introduced hasn't been part of this run (so far?)! Despite being out of sequence with the books, it does follow on slightly from the previous TV two-parter, so you do need to watch it in the broadcast order.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A real clunker
Marble X13 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Awful adaptation of P. D. James' complex tale of murder at the Dupayne Museum. For some reason, the screenwriter decided to make editions and changes that ultimately made the story uninteresting and dull.

Although originally all the Dupaynes were older 40-50s, in this version, they are all younger. Muriel Godby, originally 30ish, was aged to 50ish and her role was expanded to include creation and stewardship of the "club" that originally was Carolyn's. Calder-Hale was left out altogether and the role of Mrs. Strikland was expanded to include Calder-Hale's museum guide duties. Angela Farraday was renamed and her role cut to insignificance. When she tells Dalgliesh of her love for Neville, it's neither believable nor tragic. Emma Lavenham, Clara, Mrs. Faraday and Lady Swathling were written out of the story altogether. (Poor Francis Benton-Smith didn't make it into either version.)

The character of Carolyn Dupayne was rewritten from a strong, independent and often cold woman, to a simpering crybaby. It's not the actresses' fault. James' original characterization is more interesting and compelling. There is no effort to establish her as an instrumental part of the museum or the school.

The character of Marcus Dupayne is given no opportunity to establish his story or character. In fact, the entire Dupayne family were brushed over lightly with watercolor, rather than having the rich, colorful characterizations they originally had.

Neville Dupayne was also two dimensional and when he is killed, one has no sense of loss whatsoever, it's merely an event happening in sequence.

The story was hacked up so badly that it would be difficult for anyone who didn't know the story already, to know what is going on. In this new version, there is almost no foreshadowing before the first murder. The viewer barely has time to become acquainted with the characters before it happens. Motives are muddy and unfortunately, the writer chose to emphasize Ryan's possible involvement much more than in the original. This seemed forced.

Dramatic moments in the story were just wasted. From the discovery and horror of the first murder, to the dry, hackneyed dialogue, to the tired characterizations, this is a pale, watered-down version of what originally was a compelling story. The discovery of the second body is simply ham-handed and seemed forced, whereas in the book and the original true to book film (starring Martin Shaw) the discovery of Celia Mellock's body is dramatic and shocking.

Many parts imho were miscast. Acting was fair to middling, with unenthusiastic and lifeless performances from the guest cast.

I had high hopes for this one, particularly since the 2021 Death of an Expert Witness was so good. Oh well, can't win 'em all. If you want to see the Murder Room done right, watch the 2005 production starring Martin Shaw.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed