Change Your Image
ScottGentry
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againCheck out my Film Blog named Utopia Reviews, at the link below:
http://utopiareviews.blogspot.co.uk/?m=1
Reviews
Laggies (2014)
Lynn Shelton's latest directorial feature may be clichéd, yet it benefits from the endless charm and energy provided by Keira Knightley and Sam Rockwell.
Check out the review here: http://utopiareviews.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/lynn-sheltons-latest- directorial.html
"Say When" (15) Directed by: Lynn Shelton. Starring: Keira Knightley, Chloë Grace Moretz and Sam Rockwell. Rated: '15' for containing strong language and sex references. Running time: 99 minutes. Released in UK cinemas from the 7th of November, 2014.
Growing up can be particularly tough for some adolescents, just take Charlize Theron's character from Jason Reitman's "Young Adult" as an example. But let's face it, in the future we'll all want to relive those glorious years, filled with the typical aspects of a teenager's life. Partying, drinking, gaming, they'll all most probably appear on that long list. Here, "Say When" (named "Laggies" in the US) attempts to tell a story of facing up to the responsibilities of adulthood, yet whilst not being able to escape the crushing similarities to various other films of this context, it remains engaging due to its cast, led by an appealing performance from Knightley, despite her abhorrent attempt at an American accent.
At the age of 28, Megan (Knightley) chooses to remain a jobless, happy-go-lucky character who apart from working part-time for her father (Jeff Garlin), doesn't actually have a financially viable career. Instead Megan just wants to have fun, despite her friends decisions to marry, and a proposal from her long-term boyfriend Anthony (Mark Webber). Deciding to escape the events of a quarter-life crisis, Megan befriends a 16-year old teenager named Annika (Moretz), and decides to stay with her for a week, unbeknown to her father, Craig (Rockwell). But as the week goes by, the secret is uncovered, as Craig discovers Megan sleeping within the house. Despite her intrusion, Megan befriends Craig, and their relationship grows, prompting her to make the biggest decision of her adult life so far: Anthony or Craig?
To argue that "Say When" is an original piece of comical entertainment would be inaccurate, as it is in fact a comedy we may have seen in other forms many times, but it has been made surprisingly well, as the film benefits from the pleasing performances of its main leads, especially Knightley and Rockwell who have acquired a palatable chemistry, which bounces off of each other exceptionally well. After playing Hit Girl (from "Kick Ass") and a young prostitute from "The Equalizer", "Say When" offers Moretz the chance to portray a 'normal' character for once, and produces a charming performance, which is enjoyable.
The performances may carry the film throughout, yet without the allure of the cast, "Say When" would prove to be an arduous affair, along with a partly clichéd script and plot. Written by Andrea Seigel, the script is occasionally whimsical and dramatic, fitting the tone of Rockwell's acting especially well, but Knightley isn't American, so why cast a British actress? Well, the film reveals her likable talent throughout, but there are many opportunities to create funnier sequences for the cast, yet Seigel focuses upon the dramatic elements perhaps a little too much.
Verdict
"Say When" is an easy-going film with a balance of comedy and drama which doesn't always hit the mark, yet the performances of Knightley, Rockwell and Moretz are praiseworthy, managing to salvage this piece from becoming tedious.
6 Stars out of 10 Written by Scott Gentry
The Maze Runner (2014)
Gritless, yet this is a confident, exciting and sleek debut from director Wes Ball.
"The Maze Runner" (12A) Directed by: Wes Ball. Starring: Dylan O'Brien, Kaya Scodelario, Will Poulter, Thomas Brodie-Sangster and Patricia Clarkson. Rated: '12A' for containing intense scenes, threat and violence. Running time: 113 minutes. Released in UK cinemas from the 10th of October, 2014.
In recent years we've had countless adaptations of various teenage novels (the "Twilight" saga, "The Hunger Games" series and the beginnings of the "Divergent" chronicles are to name but a few) but it seems to me that they are always clichéd, erroneously written and occasionally prove to be tedious affairs. "The Maze Runner" was different, if only slightly.
Our unusual film begins within the confines of a small depressing lift, currently inhabited by our protagonist, Thomas (Dylan O'Brien). Sent hurtling up the lift shaft, he is anxious of what awaits him when he reaches the top. Suddenly the lift reaches its pinnacle, and two large doors are flung open, revealing bright sunlight. Thomas is surrounded by a faction of young and intimidating men, and quickly decides that he must escape his fate; good or bad. But when escaping on two legs doesn't exactly work out and his mind fails (due to the complete wipe of his memory), Thomas learns that he may have to adhere to the group's one rule: he must always stay within the confines of the glade, their home.
Upon discovering that the group are stuck within the Glade, Thomas learns however, that beyond the Glade there is a maze; an ever- changing labyrinth of such large proportions that it's impossible to escape its towering facade. Yet, during the day, the maze is mapped by a group of people named runners, fast and agile boys who constantly search the maze for a way out. They've been searching for three years, but when the new arrival begins to shine, the group decide that he may be their one chance of liberation. Nonetheless, the group are threatened, due to the fact that at night, the maze is patrolled by vicious beasts named Grievers, malignant beasts which possess a deadly sting.
Yep, it's a "Lord of the Flies"-esque survival story and to be perfectly honest, it feels like we've seen many of its elements before. Testosterone fuelled arguments and violence amongst the survivors are the key ingredients here, but it doesn't stop "The Maze Runner" from being an enjoyable piece of science-fiction. Personally, I was formerly unaware of "The Maze Runner" book series, and this proved to be an interesting concept, but I couldn't escape the feeling that it was somehow similar to "The Hunger Games" in its idea of children being tested beyond their expectations and abilities. But, I'm willing to let that slide.
In fact, this is most probably one of the most satisfying young adult adaptations in recent years, superior to "Divergent" and its various rivals, but it falters in its inability to be gritty. At the rating of '12A', the distributors are obviously attempting to encourage a wider audience into cinema screens and obtain a larger amount of money, but to impress the fans you need to keep the realistic aspects of the effects of violence firmly placed within the film. If not, it just feels as though the entire film is a large cash-grab for distributors, if it wasn't already. Saying that, there are moments of violence and bloody detail which is quite bold, but due to the lack of the film's dark nature there isn't any satirical bite to the film, or the ability to feel for each character. Even with its interesting concept, the film's script is undeniably weak. The dialogue unfortunately feels as though it should belong to a TV film, but the relationships between each character are strong and allows the film to bypass its feeble dialogue.
In spite of the film's lack of gritty elements or rich conversation, it is kept afloat by its young, yet talented cast. He may be relatively unknown, but O'Brien produces a strong performance amongst the high-calibre cast, leading the film throughout its highs and lows. The film also contains three of Britain's most engaging actors currently working in film/television today. Aml Ameen, Brodie-Sangster and Poulter (a delightfully silly antagonist) are all perfect additions to the cast, once again providing skillful performances amongst the large array of cast members. Alongside the film's broadly unknown cast, composer John Paesano is an unexplored certainty in relation to the film's wonderful score. Often tense and at other times notably melancholy, Paesano's first score is an intriguing foray into blockbuster entertainment, which is strikingly promising.
One of the film's most appealing elements however, is the direction of Ball's debut. Without having worked on previous films before, Ball is an unforeseen pleasure in the art of direction, as he seems to receive honest performances, but still manages to connect with the film's Sci-Fi aspects, by providing expert camera-work alongside cinematographer Enrique Chediak.
Verdict:
"Lord of the Flies" this isn't, and neither is it as gritty as it aspires to be, but this is a confident, exciting and sleek debut from director Wes Ball. "The Hunger Games" has finally received some worthy competition
6 stars out of 10
Check out the review on my website, at this address:
http://utopiareviews.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/the-craze-for-maze- scott-gentry-reviews.html
Gone Girl (2014)
"Gone Girl" is a thriller destined for 'vintage' status.
"Gone Girl" (18) Directed by: David Fincher. Starring: Ben Affleck, Rosamund Pike, Tyler Perry, Neil Patrick Harris, Carrie Coon and Scoot McNairy. Rated: 18 for containing strong bloody violence and very strong language. Running time: 148 minutes, 51 seconds. Released in UK cinemas from Thursday, the 2nd of October, 2014.
Earlier this year Gillian Flynn's best-selling novel, "Gone Girl", left me devastated. It was a paperback which led me to believe that it had great potential, yet it only managed to provide riveting entertainment throughout its first two thirds. However, it was the ending that spoiled a perfect novel. An ending so inconceivable, that I refused to read another book by Gillian Flynn. Since then I've contemplated why I felt that way, and have graced Fincher's adaptation with gleeful abundance. But, the novelist lied. When Flynn promised a different ending to the film adaptation (which she has also scripted) I was overjoyed, but it turns out that there is no difference whatsoever between the ending of the book and the film.
Personal ranting aside, Fincher's attempt at another critically acclaimed novel is exceptional. It opens with the idea of a perfect marriage, and descends into a convoluted series of mind-games and elements of social commentary, based upon the media's idea of what it is to be accused of murder, and how to deal with their wrath.
Nick Dunne (Affleck) is a thirty-something writer who lives in the heart of Carthage, Texas, alongside his beautiful wife Amy (Pike), who is a writer of the "Amazing Amy" book series. All is well in the Dunne household until one day, when Nick returns home from his morning errands to find that Amy is nowhere to be found. With smashed objects lying around the living-room, Nick discerns that his wife may be missing. Upon notifying the police and his family, the media swarm upon Nick like a pack of wolves, aggravating him at every turn. Soon through Nick's albeit strange behaviour, the public perception of Nick's intentions begin to change, with many people asking the same horrifying question: Did Nick Dunne kill his wife?
You think you know the story? Think again. Sticking close to the source material, Flynn has allowed for Affleck's best performance in many-a-year. Portraying a potential murderer has allowed him to expand his acting talents, with added humour and bite, putting behind his previously disappointing performances and adding this latest role to the shelf of his recent successes, emerging a fully- fledged actor.
Without Affleck's participation the film wouldn't work with another actor in his role, and it's the same case in relation to Pike. Ever since she was viewed in Pierce Brosnan's "Die another Day", she has continued to excel in all of her films. Here she plays with the audience's mind, allowing us to encourage her character at one moment, and hate her, the next. It's a strange quality, but her performance is a quiet, yet absorbing one, eventually revealing how talented she really is. A career best performance, I have no doubt.
Apart from the two leads, the film also benefits from a constantly intriguing cast, full of actors who show a side of themselves that didn't deem possible. There are two actors in particular: Tyler Perry and Neil Patrick-Harris.
Yes, Tyler Perry has finally delivered a solid supporting performance that doesn't involve dressing up in a ridiculous stereotypical costume and requires him to actually act. And that he does. Every detail is understated, but he is surprising. As is Harris, who also astonishes within the film, as a constant reminder that he too can actually act when not required to be starring in "How I Met Your Mother", delivering a peculiar performance that's both creepy and comforting. Scoot McNairy also appears within the film as a troubled ex-boyfriend of Amy, who, when confronted about Amy's past relationship, creates a dark presence which suits his style exceptionally well. He may only appear for one scene, but it's definitely appreciated.
Gillian Flynn may be adapting her own novel, but why not? She's the perfect candidate for the job. She has spent countless hours carefully crafting these characters and events for her novel, so she should know them from the inside out. That itself is evident. For each scene the audience are treated to characters that are written with affection and the idea that they are actually worth caring about. It's a skill that is worth having, and shows that Flynn may be more than just a novelist, despite her decision in regards to the film's finale.
As always, Fincher is a master behind the camera. His ability to get the very best performances out of his actors is phenomenal, and he does it again here, in a thriller that seems as if it was written especially for his mind. Perhaps it was, and along with his camera angles and general skill in the art, he produces a sleek looking film that mirrors his vision of "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" (2011).
As most recent Fincher films have been scored by Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross ("The Social Network" and "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo"), the pair have returned to produce a strange and absorbing soundtrack, which fits the tone of the film perfectly. In particular, their track named "A Reflection" is a splendid example of how talented they are, and how dark the film actually becomes. It couldn't be better.
Fincher's latest film is an unflinching rendition of marriage in its true form. Darkly comic and boasting some of the finest and most unanticipated performances for many years, "Gone Girl" is a thriller destined for 'vintage' status.
X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)
An excellent beginning to the large group of summer blockbusters.
"X-Men: Days Of Future Past" (12A) Director: Bryan Singer. Starring: Hugh Jackman, James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Jennifer Lawrence and Peter Dinklage.
Since Bryan Singer departed from "X-Men: The Last Stand" in 2006 (to direct "Superman Returns", we could have done without it, right?) and foolishly left it within the incapable hands of Brett Ratner, the franchise never felt that it reached the same heights as "X-2", despite Mathew Vaughn's well received continuation of the series, "X-Men: First Class". However Bryan Singer has finally returned to the directing chair to deliver drama, action and interesting Sci-Fi, in his classic style.
Set in the year 2023, "X-Men: DOFP" finds our world in absolute apocalyptic turmoil, as the mutant-slaying, robotic hunters known as the Sentinels, scour planet Earth in order to rid the world of all Mutant- kind. Now with only a small pocket of Mutants left (including Wolverine, Magneto and Storm) acting as the resistance, they realise that the Sentinels are an unstoppable force.
As Patrick Stewart's Professor X so rightly states, "Is the future truly set?" It seems not, as Kitty Pryde (Ellen Page, where's she been these past few years?) argues that due to Logan's ability to heal at lightning fast speed, his consciousness should be sent back into the past to seek the help of the team's former selves, in order to change the events of history forever. Despite its slightly confusing plot-line "X-Men: DOFP" deals well with the interweaving stories, and presents itself as perhaps this summer's most inventive blockbuster.
In regards to being inventive, Singer once again directs with a perfect balance, as he directs his ninth film with expert camera-work and beautiful cinematography from Newton Thomas Sigel ("Drive") to match.
The cast itself are (as always) uniformly brilliant, along with Jackman, McAvoy, Dinklage and Fassbender delivering great performances amongst the large and ambitious set-pieces; it's Jennifer Lawrence though, who ultimately receives the largest amount of screen-time and character development as Mystique, and rightly decides to once again prove her undeniable talent for acting. Despite this ensemble cast however, it unfortunately seems that there are far too many characters to actually keep a track of, and are (like the characters of "Godzilla") ultimately missed.
In spite of its misused cast, we are (briefly) introduced to the character of Quicksilver (AKA Pietro Maximoff, played brilliantly by Evan Peters), a young man who has the amazing ability of superhuman speed, who sets about saving the team from many a misfortune, including an exciting scene in which Maximoff sprints around a villain-filled room so fast, that whilst running, he rearranges the directions of each security guard's guns, hats and fists, leading to a humorous climax.
There is also a welcome return from Singer's regular film composer John Ottman, who produces an often dramatic and exciting score, which is reminiscent of Alan Silvestri's soundtrack of "The Avengers" (2012).
The overbearing cast was an unfortunate step to have made, but Singer and his screenwriter Simon Kinberg eventually make up for their minor mistake, in the form of some much needed, yet reserved character development, which is what the first two "X-Men" instalments prided themselves upon; being a Superhero film that was intelligent and dramatic, yet action-packed.
Verdict:
"X-Men: DOFP" is an impressive return from Singer and despite the misuse of this high-calibre cast, it works almost as well as "X-2". It's most definitely not perfect, but it is an excellent beginning to the large group of summer blockbusters.
7 Stars out of 10
- Written by Scott Gentry.
Edge of Tomorrow (2014)
Arguably Tom Cruise's finest performance for years.
"Edge of Tomorrow" (12A) Directed by: Doug Liman. Starring: Tom Cruise, Emily Blunt, Bill Paxton, Brendan Gleeson and Jonas Armstrong.
Tom Cruise is 50 years old, but by heck, he doesn't look it. His latest Sci-Fi epic "Edge of Tomorrow" takes the alien invasion plot device and neatly places it within the subject of time travel (or time displacement, it depends on your interpretation!).
Cruise plays Major William Cage, an officer who has never seen a day of combat, due to his job of literally being the face of the army, during a war between the human race and an alien nation, known as Mimics. Yes, you guessed it. Cage is a cowardly, yet slick, public relations officer (a reinterpretation of his character Jerry Maguire?) who is safe behind the cameras and news crews. But, due to unforeseen circumstances whilst in Britain, Cage is thrust into the battle for the front line, which will eventually amount to becoming a complete suicide mission.
Upon landing on a beach within France (it's slightly reminiscent of Normandy), Cage is killed within minutes, but is inexplicably caught within a time loop, that forces him to relive the cursed battle over and over again. As Cage fights within each battle however, he becomes stronger and wiser, eventually discovering that with the help of fellow officer Rita Vrataski (Emily Blunt), they might just be able to end the war for ever.
It's complicated, yet intriguing, and that's possibly why this adaptation of the graphic novel "All You Need Is Kill" by Hiroshi Sakurazaka, is so entertaining. From the opening battle to the very last scene, Doug Liman's eighth directorial feature is completed in its excellence by screenwriters Christopher McQuarrie, Jez and John-Henry Butterworth. The trio of experienced writers (McQuarrie wrote "The Usual Suspects", if you haven't seen it, you must!) strive to bring audiences something fresh and exciting despite the format having been used numerous times within "Source Code" (2011) and "Groundhog Day" (1993).
Fortunately that's just what they do, by simply adding in romance and comedic elements, with Tom Cruise seemingly doing what he does best, by contributing his humorous charisma and providing a great and appealing performance, in order to keep the film light at times, yet dark in others. Emily Blunt also acts well in the form of the officer, Rita (aptly named the "full metal b**ch"), who seems to perform in a reserved manner, yet keeps in line with the warrior style.
The rest of the cast also provide fine support, especially actors such as Bill Paxton (equipped with a wonderfully unhinged performance), and Brendan Gleeson who isn't given a large role, but performs well, and is always welcome on the big screen, especially after his performance in this year's black comedy, "Calvary" from John Michael McDonagh. Other actors such as Jonas Armstrong (formerly portraying Robin Hood, in the BBC series), Tony Way (also seen in "Game Of Thrones", as Ser Dontos Hollard) and Franz Drameh (from "Attack The Block") all act perfectly, nailing the fine line between serious and comical.
Despite the great chemistry between Blunt and Cruise, I couldn't help but notice however, that (because it's a Doug Liman movie, it must have a tad bit of romance!) the romantic side to the main characters relationship, seems slightly tedious, but when it does work, it works particularly well and the two leads are more than capable of holding the romantic side of the story together.
In regards to the director Doug Liman, this is possibly his finest film since "The Bourne Identity", directing each action sequence with style and proving that he can direct a film that is decent in terms of its plot and cast. Each action sequence has also been planned and edited perfectly by James Herbert, in order to deliver a "Saving Private Ryan" feel to the battle, putting his skills as editor on Guy Ritchie's highly stylised "Sherlock Holmes" films, to good use. The composer Christophe Beck also contributes by creating an exciting score to the film, including an impressive theme that is used throughout the film. It is also worth mentioning the quality of the visual effects by Nick Davis ("The Dark Knight"), in particular the aliens known as Mimics look extremely well designed. In addition to the visual effects, Dion Beebe's cinematography is perfect, capturing the gritty style of war and apocalyptic themes just as well his cinematography for "Equilibrium" (2002).
Verdict
"Edge of Tomorrow" is an intriguing and ambitious blockbuster which is constantly funny, shocking and engaging; it's arguably Tom Cruise's finest performance for years.
8 Stars out of 10
Written by Scott Gentry.
22 Jump Street (2014)
Quite possibly the funniest film of the year so far; Lord and Miller's sequel is pure delight.
"22 Jump Street" (15) Directed by: Phil Lord and Christopher Miller. Starring: Jonah Hill, Channing Tatum, Peter Stormare, Ice Cube, Amber Stevens and Nick Offerman.
After cracking the case of a lifetime, officers Scmidt (Hill) and Jenko (Tatum) are back on the streets to investigate a villainous drug smuggler, known only as Ghost (Stormare). The investigation however, proves to be unsuccessful and as their Deputy Chief Hardy (Offerman) puts it ever so bluntly, "just go back and do the same s**t you did last time. Then everyone's happy", the pair soon act upon the chief's stern warning, and return to undercover assignments. This time the pair are placed amongst a university, in order to stop a new drug named "WhyPhy" (it's pronounced like Wi-Fi), from going viral.
It's worth remembering that "21 Jump Street" was a film that wasn't expected to perform well in terms of critical and commercial success, however the film exceeded all expectations, proving to become a sure- fire hit, with a relatively small budget of $42 million. Sequels are normally bigger in terms of budget, cast and plot and this is no exception with "22 Jump Street", which had a budget of $70 million, proving that with every sequel, the budget increases dramatically, which is also evident in James Bobin's "Muppets Most Wanted", released earlier this year.
In spite of budget increases, sequels can become however too ambitious for their own good. But thankfully, this isn't the case with "22 Jump Street". Instead this is a sequel which continues to deliver quirky and off-beat sensibilities like its predecessor, which is mainly due to the inspired writing of Michael Bacall, Oren Uziel and Rodney Rothman, a trio of screenwriters, who are ambitious in their comedic style. The film's style and script is often reminiscent of "Scott Pilgrim V.s The World", (a film which Bacall also helped write, alongside Edgar Wright), which proves the comedic style is one that works extremely well on screen.
The direction is also well organised by the duo Lord and Miller, a pair of directors who met in Dartmouth College and proceeded to direct films such as 2009's "Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs", "21 Jump Street" and "The Lego Movie, all of which opened to critical acclaim. Having shown their ability for mixing comedy and riotous action, the two use their creative input to once again create a bizarre comedy, which is as zany as the first.
If not the funniest script this year, "22 Jump Street" is completed in its excellence by the pairing of Hill and Tatum. The two actors, possibly providing the most homo erotic bromance ever seen on screen, undeniably contributing exceptional comic performances, confirming their ability to act in an all manner of roles; Hill was electrifying in "The Wolf Of Wall Street" and Tatum has reportedly provided a career best performance, in Bennett Miller's "Foxcatcher".
Verdict
Quite possibly the funniest film of the year so far; Lord and Miller's sequel is pure delight, with whip-smart comedy and a bone-achingly funny end credits sequence. "23 Jump Street"? Yes please.
8 Stars out of 10
Written by Scott Gentry.
12 Years a Slave (2013)
A requisite piece of cinema.
"12 Years A Slave" (15) Director: Steve McQueen. Starring: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Paul Giamatti, Benedict Cumberbatch, Paul Dano, Michael Fassbender and Lupita Nyong'o. Rated: 15 for containing, strong violence, injury detail, sex, nudity and racist terms. Running time: 134 minutes. Out now in UK cinemas.
"12 Years a Slave" reveals the disconsolate tale of Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a free man from the year 1841, who was deceived, kidnapped and sold into slavery.
Steve McQueen is particularly well known for creating works of fragility, including his last two pieces "Shame" and "Hunger", which are both of an extremely high standard. Now having completed his third feature length film, Steve McQueen has decided to tackle a delicate subject, which requires the utmost respect; and received it. The film is at times extremely brutal, but delivers a completely honest insight into slavery and the effects it had on our society.
Placed in development for quite some time, it wasn't until 2011 that Steve McQueen finally announced his next film would be "12 Years a Slave", after the success of "Shame". Originally, the screenwriter John Ridley was reluctant to join the film until his wife recommended that he read Solomon Northup's book. Soon afterword, John began to collaborate with McQueen and the rest (as they say), is history.
Dealing with something so disturbing, needs a cast which can become the characters they are meant to be portraying, no matter how cruel. Chiwetel Ejiofor is a revelation in the role of Solomon, previously only portraying supporting characters in many of his roles including his performance in the stunning film, "Children of Men" (a film by Alfonso Cuaron) alongside Clive Owen. Finally receiving the lead role he was born to play, Chiwetel is not only convincing, but unbelievable as he physically degrades himself, by acting in many uncomfortable scenes; including a scenario where Solomon is strung up by his neck for a large amount of time.
The film's supporting cast also includes Michael Fassbender, who plays a barbarous slave owner named Edwin Epps, whose uncontrollable hate leads to many vivid scenes of violence upon his slaves. Perhaps the actress given the most amount of attention during the current awards season is Lupita Nyong'o (Lupita only formerly acted in a short film named "East River"), with her interesting interpretation of Patsy (an abused slave) which is exemplary. It is only fair to also mention that Paul Dano and Benedict Cumberbatch both act vigorously in their roles.
Other details of the film are designed to perfection, including the costumes, sets and the aspects of slavery. Composed by Hanz Zimmer (and including work from John Legend and Alicia Keys) the "12 Years a Slave" soundtrack is powerful, but unfortunately not Zimmer's best work.
Verdict
A genuine classic that may appal some viewers, or teach others of a time when it was perfectly acceptable to exploit ethnic minorities. A requisite piece of cinema.
10 stars out of 10.
Written by Scott Gentry.
Delivery Man (2013)
Sweet, funny and just right.
"Delivery Man" (12A) Director: Ken Scott. Starring: Vince Vaughn, Chris Pratt and Cobie Smulders. Rated: 12A for containing moderate sex and drug references, and one use of strong language. Running time: 104 minutes. Out now in UK cinemas.
"Delivery Man" follows the story of David Wozniak (Vaughn), an underachiever who after donating close to 600 specimens of his sperm to a fertility clinic (20 years ago); realises that he has inadvertently become a father to the largest family in the world. When 142 of his children set out to find the identity of their father, David is faced with two choices, accept the challenge of parenthood, or remain anonymous. Will he do the right thing?
Typical Vince Vaughn comedies are rude, crude and extremely unfunny, but from the offset "Delivery Man" proved to be a better film than I believed it to be. After viewing the film's trailer, I wasn't really sold on the idea, and felt it was just another pay-check for Vaughn. However, it seems as though I was wrong. By all accounts, I'm not saying it's perfect, but it definitely is entertaining.
The one thing I can't quite understand is why Ken Scott has remade his already popular Canadian film "Starbuck". Using the exact same plot-line, the original film is far more popular with American audiences than his re-make "Delivery Man" is. I suppose it's just another case of Michael Haneke's "Funny Games".
Personally, I'm finding it quite hard to understand why "Delivery Man" is classed as a comedy, because it's quite the opposite. Sure there are funny scenes, but the film relies on often sad and dramatic stories which sometimes don't fit in well with the 'comedy' genre. A feel-good film yes, but not really a laugh out loud comedy.
Vince Vaughn in "Delivery Man"
Vaughn acts considerably well in his role, which proves he can act when given a reasonable script and character. Cobie Smulders ("The Avengers") is fairly convincing as Vaughn's girlfriend but her talents seem wasted, as the actress is not given a large amount of screen time. Chris Pratt however manages to steal both Vaughn's and Smulder's thunder, by contributing an enjoyable supporting role, which is both hilarious, as it is touching.
Verdict
Sweet, funny and just right, a film like this is hard to pull off, but it seems Ken Scott and his crew prevailed.
6 stars out of 10.
Written by Scott Gentry.
Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues (2013)
"A2:TLC" is definitely classy.
"Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues" (15) Director: Adam McKay. Starring: Will Ferrell, Steve Carrell, David Koechner, Paul Rudd and Kristen Wiig. Rated: 15 for containing infrequent strong sex references, and hard drug use. Running time: 119 minutes. Released: 18th of December, 2013.
"Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues" now finds Ron (Will Ferrell) and the gang putting the seventies behind them and embracing the eighties, with the job of working on America's first 24 hour news channel, to hilarious effect.
When its predecessor ("Anchorman: The Legend Of Ron Burgundy") arrived in UK cinemas back in 2004, it almost failed to find an audience. Showing in a limited amount of screens, many people avoided the film and instead waited for the DVD release. Thanks to the release of the film on DVD, it achieved a cult following and it's fan base has since grown considerably in numbers. Some say that we've waited too long for a sequel, but I disagree.
The return of "Anchorman" was slightly feared by fans and many people argued whether the new instalment would be made terribly and ruin the reputation of its predecessor; but it honestly doesn't. In fact, the cast and crew have had nine long years to bring back some of our favourite comic creations, in classic style. Was it worth the wait? Definitely.
Satirising America yet again, Adam McKay and his team provide their customary brand of zany and silly humour, which some people just can't grasp. It's unfortunate, because when "Anchorman" clicks, it works really well.
Much like part one, "A2:TLC" provides plenty of hilarious one-liners and quickly descends into madness throughout the third act. There are plenty of memorable scenes, including a battle between all the news-teams (including a bucket load of cameos) and a scene involving a bottle fed shark. Confused? I certainly was!
The cast are once again superb, with Will Ferrell leading an all star cast, including the likes of Steve Carrell and Kristen Wiig, who both provide a hilarious love interest/side story which works well, considering the already over-crowded plot-line.
The film's only weakness is its length; teetering on the edge of two hours, the film unfortunately begins to lose momentum throughout the second act. However, it provides a brilliant comedy sequel that actually works where so many films have tried and failed.
Verdict
A great sequel which could obviously never live up to the original, but entertains perfectly well, revealing new characters and plenty of genuine laughs; "A2:TLC" is definitely classy.
7.5 Stars out of 10.
Written by Scott Gentry.
The Zero Theorem (2013)
Gilliam has delivered a long-awaited return to Sci-Fi, which repeatedly bewilders, in that classic Gilliam style, which is set to dazzle the least likely of Sci-Fi fans.
"The Zero Theorem" (TBC) Director: Terry Gilliam. Starring: Christoph Waltz, Matt Damon, Mélanie Thierry and David Thewlis. Rated: TBC Running time: 107 minutes. Release date: 2014.
Set in the near future, Qohen Leth (Christoph Waltz) is constantly sat at his computer, working. Never able to enjoy his life, Qohen is constantly waiting for the a phone call, which he believes, will describe the purpose of his life. When re-assigned to work on 'The Zero Theorem' program at work, he begins to realise what life is really about.
Every year the BFI (British Film Institute) organises a brilliant event, named the British Film Festival. At the festival, film is honoured in spectacular form, with films being submitted from all over the world, including Britain.
Unfortunately (due to unforeseen circumstances) , I was only able to watch one film. I'm just glad it turned out to be, "The Zero Theorem".
Terry Gilliam ("Life Of Brian" and "The Brothers Grimm") has been directing films since 1968. Often though of (by me anyway!) as the director who defines, 'cult' films and nicknamed Captain Chaos, Gilliam constantly surprises audiences with audacious pieces of cinema; which really do entertain.
In recent years, Gilliam's works have (arguably) become slightly worse, than his more fresh and original films, such as "Brazil". From mystical beasts to a story following a travelling theatre company, Gilliam just hasn't delivered a fine piece, for at least fifteen years. Thankfully, we can put those mistakes behind him; as, "The Zero Theorem" is a fantastic ride.
Approaching this storyline with stunning visuals and and an addictive style, "The Zero Theorem" has a plot which may not explore it's ideas to a further degree, but entertains extremely well.
The film is quite daring, because it talks about exploring the purpose of life and the effects that it might leave on certain people. Nothing quite like his past efforts, Gilliam approaches this piece lightly and lets the film develop slowly as it goes along.
The cast are exceptional, with Christoph Waltz delivering an often comedic performance, that frequently mirrors the portrayal of his character (Dr. King Schultz) in "Django Unchained". Mélanie Thierry plays Bainsley (A future type of prostitute) in an entirely believable role, which often proves how good an actress she really is. Matt Damon also acts well with his short, but pivotal role as 'Management' in a commonly bewitching cameo.
Gilliam has delivered a long-awaited return to Sci-Fi, which repeatedly bewilders, in that classic Gilliam style, which is set to dazzle the least likely of Sci-Fi fans.
7 stars out of 10.
Written by Scott Gentry.
Thanks for Sharing (2012)
A genuine crowd pleaser, despite it's delicate overtones.
"Thanks For Sharing" Director: Stuart Blumberg. Starring: Mark Ruffalo, Tim Robbins and Gwyneth Paltrow. Rated: 15, for containing strong sex, sex references and strong language. Running Time: 112 minutes. Out now in UK cinemas.
"Thanks For Sharing" follows a group of individuals, who are trying to overcome a natural urge, sex. As they attend an addicts group led by Mike (Tim Robbins), our story focuses on three central characters (Adam - Mark Ruffalo, Neil - Josh Gad and Dede - Alecia Moore), who begin to develop romances and friendships; through their mistakes and successes.
You've got to admit, selling a film about sex addiction to producers must be hard; however it seems director Stuart Blumberg (writer of the award winning film "The Kids Are All Right) has succeeded.
Films of this nature have begun cropping up in the last three years, the most memorable being Steve McQueen's "Shame", a dramatic and often shocking look at sex addiction through one man; Brandon (Michael Fassbender).
"Thanks For Sharing" (albeit tough and challenging material at times) doesn't live up fully to my expectations based upon films like "Shame". However, this doesn't matter.
This film may not be as emotionally wrenching as "Shame", but it doesn't need to be. It gets across a clear and delicate message, in which the most unlikely of audiences will be able to get their head around.
The film begins with a small but insightful invitation into the lives of our (very different) main characters. It's good that all characters come from different situations and backgrounds, as there may be people who have these problems and this film could be a way to help their addiction, but on a more relate-able level.
The aspect of sex addiction, is no joke. The film delivers a very real look into the character's lives, but always (barely) keeps inside the comedy/drama genre. At times the film is explicit, but it partly needs to be; as the film should delve properly into the addiction and not deliver a sugar-coated Hollywood comedy. Thankfully, it doesn't.
The main cast is superb. Mark Ruffallo delivers a perfect and believable performance, especially when the film develops dark overtones. Gwyneth Paltrow acts exceedingly well in a non-Pepper Pots ("Iron Man" reference) role which allows her to flourish into a seasoned actress. Alecia Moore (stage name, PINK) portrays a slightly underused, but likable character.
Verdict
Honestly, "Thanks For Sharing" is a more accessible film than "Shame". still delivering the sharp dialogue and awkward situations under a lighter (sometimes dark) mood. A genuine crowd pleaser, despite it's delicate overtones.
7 Stars out of 10 = Excellent.
Written by Scott Gentry.
R.I.P.D. (2013)
Disgraceful CGI, 3D and unlikable characters, this really is evidence that not even the great Jeff Bridges couldn't save "R.I.P.D". A movie car pile up, of epic proportions.
"R.I.P.D" (12A) Directed by: Robert Schwentke. Starring: Jeff Bridges, Ryan Reynolds, Kevin Bacon and Mary-Louis Parker. Rated: 12A, for containing moderate fantasy violence and threat, with uses of moderate bad language. Running time: 96 minutes. Out now in UK cinemas.
Plot synopsis
After stealing some gold during a drug bust, policeman Nick Walker (Ryan Reynolds) makes the difficult decision to return the gold which is evidence, to the police department. However, his partner Hayes (Kevin Bacon) has other ideas and shoots Nick during a raid on a warehouse. Following his death, Nick's spirit drifts into the sky and arrives in the office of the R.I.P.D (Rest in peace department). Once there, Nick is recruited to capture wandering spirits or face judgement. On accepting, Nick is partnered with Roy (Jeff Bridges) an 18th century Marshall with a disturbing obsession with hats.
From the first five minutes, it was clear that "R.I.P.D" was an absolute piece of cods-wallop. The 3D effects were shoddy, there was terrible acting from both leads and even the action was dull.
You may be saying to yourself, the film can't be that bad surely? Well, it was. "R.I.P.D" is every film critic's nightmare.
I'm going to be honest, I really wanted to like "R.I.P.D" but Hollywood has gone a step too far. The script was terrible, containing a straight copy-cat role from "True Grit" for Jeff Bridges and the casual one note performance style for Reynolds. Kevin Bacon (who is usually very good) delivered possibly the worst performance of his life, acting lifelessly at every possible moment.
Having viewed "R.I.P.D" in 3D (why, oh why!?) there were no 3D effects whatsoever. Not even one creature jumped out from the screen. With most films including (decent-ish) 3D effects, you expect (at the very least) a few effects from a 3D film. The CGI was especially shoddy, boasting large set pieces and never delivering on quality.
Honestly, "R.I.P.D" has an interesting story, but (in my opinion) was never intended for a big- screen debut. It shares so many similarities with the "Men In Black" franchise, that it's hard not to recognise them. Really, it should have been left alone.
Verdict
Disgraceful CGI, 3D and unlikable characters, this really is evidence that not even the great Jeff Bridges couldn't save "R.I.P.D". A movie car pile up, of epic proportions.
1 stars out of 10
Rush (2013)
Despite a minor blip, "Rush" performs just the way it should. Delivering great acting, fabulous set pieces and exhilarating racing, "Rush" runs ever so smoothly.
"Rush" (15) Director: Ron Howard Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Daniel Brühl, Olivia Wilde, Natalie Dormer and Alexandra Maria Lara. Running time: 123 minutes. Rated: 15, for containing strong language, sex and bloody injury detail. Out now in UK cinemas.
Set during the 1976 Formula One season, "Rush" explores the rivalry between James Hunt (Chris Hemsworth) and Niki Lauda (Daniel Brühl) and the respect that they had for one another.
Back in 2010, the Formula One film was re-born with "Senna", an interesting documentary which looked into the final years of Ayrton Senna's life. Received extraordinarily well by both fans and critics alike, "Senna" was considered to be the (by some people) best film about Formula One in cinema history.
Three years later, Ron Howard ("The Da Vinci Code") decided to direct a film which would appeal to fans of Formula One and the general film fan. It is definite that he has succeeded.
The film begins by telling the viewer the interesting stories behind each character. Hunt (Chris Hemsworth) always acting the playboy routine and Lauda (Brühl) being a straight laced man who goes to bed early and performs well. Entirely different people.
The biopic genre of film is not unfamiliar territory for Ron Howard; as he has directed the powerful political drama "Frost/Nixon" which was a return to his biopic films.
Both actors play their roles extremely well. Chris Hemsworth performs to a degree which we have never seen him before, adapting the playboy persona like a duck to water. However, it is Daniel Brühl who steals the show as Niki Lauda. Olivia Wilde delivers a solid performance as Hunt's wife, Suzy Miller, despite her clearly underwritten part. Alexandra Maria Lara portrays Lauda's wife in a larger role than Wilde's which gives her character time to flourish.
The racing sequences are shot brilliantly. Cameras are placed everywhere on the cars, from gear sticks to the hood; Howard invites the viewer to really take a look into the world of Formula One from a completely different angle.
As the film continues, we are swept along a dark road in which James Hunt takes, whereas Niki Lauda does not; and explores problems with the pair's relationships.
The only problem that I had with "Rush" was that it never explored the undeniable respect which Hunt and Lauda had for each other. In footage of past races, Hunt and Lauda were always close and rarely shared bad words, but here they act like bombs just waiting to explode.
Verdict
Despite a minor blip, "Rush" performs just the way it should. Delivering great acting, fabulous set pieces and exhilarating racing, "Rush" runs ever so smoothly.
9 stars out of 10.
About Time (2013)
Don't miss it, unless you can travel back in time!
"About Time" (12A) Director: Richard Curtis. Starring: Rachel McAdams, Bill Nighy, Domhnall Gleeson and Tom Hollander. Rated: 12A, for containing infrequent strong language and moderate sex references. Running Time: 123 minutes. Out Now in UK cinemas.
Tim (Domhnall Gleeson), is not having any luck with the ladies. On the day of his 21st birthday, Tim's luck finally changes for the better, when his dad (Bill Nighy) explains to Tim that all the men in his family; are able to travel in time. Bewildered, Tim decides to use this new-found gift, in order to find the girl of his dreams.
Having directed his third feature film (including "About Time"), Richard Curtis has established himself as the perfect man to write a romantic comedy. From bumbling men (Hugh Grant) to a wickedly funny priest (Rowan Atkinson),Curtis is never unable to create iconic characters.
His last effort, "The Boat That Rocked", was shallow to say the least. It seemed as though Curtis had started with a great idea, cast and soundtrack, but lost something along the way. The script perhaps?
Anyway, "About Time" is by no means a disappointment; it really is a warm welcome back to the genre Curtis has helped to perfect.
Out of all the romantic comedies available, "About Time" is the one that I would gladly watch again. There have been so many terrible comedies lately, its hard to find one which is adequate for viewing. But, "About Time" is near perfect.
The performances from the whole cast are fantastic, with a particularly funny, yet sarcastic character named Harry (Tom Hollander). Domhnall Gleeson is terrific and proves he is one of best young actors on our screens today. Rachel McAdams acts well but doesn't seem to bring much flair to her character.
The film also explores the time travel genre with fun and quirky quips, but also poses questions to the audience which prove to be interesting. It goes without saying, that Curtis can almost definitely write a good script when given time to mature, and that he has done.
Verdict
"About Time" is a joy to behold, teaching but never preaching, the film delivers a decent message about enjoying life to the full; cleansed in clean jokes and interesting characters. Don't miss it, unless you can travel back in time!
7 stars out of 10.
Elysium (2013)
I got a satisfying piece of cinema, which delivers better than some of this years earlier Sci-Fi offerings.
"Elysium" (15) Director: Neill Blomkamp. Starring: Matt Damon, Jodie Foster, Sharlto Copley. Running time: 109 minutes. Rated: 15 for containing strong language, bloody violence and gory images. Out now in UK cinemas.
Set in the year 2154, poverty is at an all time high. The rich live in the sanctity of 'Elysium', a utopia, safely stationed on the outskirts of Earth's atmosphere, while the poor are left to die on Earth. When Max Da Costa (Matt Damon) an inhabitant of Earth, is given one of the hardest missions of his criminal career, he is given the chance to break down the barriers between two worlds.
"District 9" is arguably one of the best Sci-Fi films to be released in the last ten years. Dismissing all clichés, "District 9" set out to be different, not to become your average popcorn muncher, thanks to it's director Neill Blomkamp.
This is where "Elysium" fails. "Elysium" really is just another Hollywood blockbuster, which never dares to be as raw and emotional wrenching, compared to "District 9". It's a disappointment on many levels, but worth praising when it comes to other areas in the film.
"Elysium" has an original and intriguing concept to begin with, but then travels into the realm of a typical action film. For at least the first half an hour, the film plays around with the culture of it's setting; shows you how the world has developed and then it thrusts you into bombarding set pieces, which mainly take place on Elysium. Saying that, the action and CGI is a joy to watch; pushing the boundaries of the film when it comes to certain scenes, including a man being healed after a severe wound, due to an exploded grenade. On a whole, the film really does look amazing, with some exceptional shots of the Elysium habitat.
The characters are well played by a sublime cast list, ranging from Jodie Foster to Matt Damon; who both act considerably well. Saying that, it is Sharlto Copley who really steals the show, as Agent Kruger, a vicious sleeper agent who is intriguing and fun to watch.
What I really wanted to see from Blomkamp, was a sequel to "District 9", but instead I got a satisfying piece of cinema, which delivers better than some of this years earlier Sci-Fi offerings.
5 stars out of 10 = Good.
Kick-Ass 2 (2013)
Lets hope, that Mathew Vaughn takes the reigns of the third installment.
Kick Ass 2" (15) Director: Jeff Wadlow. Starring: Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Chloe Grace Moretz, Jim Carrey and Christopher Mintz-Plasse. Running time: 103 minutes. Rated: 15 for containing strong bloody violence, sex references and very strong language. Out now in UK cinemas.
After the actions of Kick Ass (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Hit Girl (Chloe Grace Moretz) in "Kick Ass", their bravery (or stupidity) inspires people to stand up to injustice, become superheroes and join the crime fighting group named Justice Forever, led by Colonel Stars and Stripes (Jim Carrey). Soon, Chris D'Amico (formerly known as Red Mist) hears of Justice Forever and decides to counteract the superheroes by assembling his own team, led by the world's first super-villain, The Mo*********.
It is without a doubt, that "Kick Ass" was one of the most original and ambitious creations to be released in 2010. It was different, it was gritty and above all, it dared to go that little bit further. Heralded 'shocking', by both critics and classifiers alike, "Kick Ass" really did turn the tables on the comic book genre, by delivering a fresh and brutal piece of film-making.
Written and directed by newcomer Jeff Wadlow (2008's "Never Back Down"), his direction is good but doesn't offer the same style as Mathew Vaughn and has instead gone for a cheap style of Hollywood remake. His script is entertaining, but not satirical in it's approach. It almost feels as though he has deliberately gone for a script which has some of the qualities of "Kick Ass", that can relate to people who aren't fans of comic books.
"Kick Ass 2" is just as brutal as it's predecessor, but not as effective. It includes all the stabbings, punches and villainous high jinks, but it never seems to be quite as entertaining as it should be. There are many memorable sequences, including a fight scene which takes place on the motorway and a fight in suburbia; but it just doesn't feel enough.
The cast have acted well, delivering fun and fresh performances; including Jim Carrey as Colonel Stars and Stripes who has improved on some of his later roles like "The Incredible Burt Wonderstone".
Verdict
It may not be the sequel we were all hoping for, but it was entertaining, brutal and above all; satisfying. Lets hope, that Mathew Vaughn takes the reigns of the third installment.
6 stars out of 10 = Good.
Written by Scott Gentry.
We're the Millers (2013)
It may not be outstanding, but it sure is satisfying.
"We're The Millers" (15) Director: Rawson Marshall Thurber. Starring: Jason Sudeikis, Jennifer Aniston, Emma Roberts and Will Poulter. Running Time: 110 minutes. Rated: 15, for containing strong language, references to sex and drugs. Out now in UK cinemas.
David Clark (Jason Sudeikis) has been drug dealing as long as he can remember. Selling to mothers, chefs and just about anyone, David is everyone's preferred drug dealer. On returning from his daily activities, he is robbed and of his money and drug stash, which he partly owes to his supplier and drug-lord Brad Gurdlinger (Ed Helms). To redeem himself, David is forced to smuggle marijuana from Mexico and back into the United States.
Realising, that men of his style seem suspicious to federal agents, he decides to hire a stripper named Rose (Jennifer Aniston), his neighbor named Kenny (Will Poulter) and a teenage runaway called Casey (Emma Roberts); to act as his fake family, the Millers.
This may come to you as a surprise dear readers, but I actually enjoyed "We're The Millers" to quite an extent. Have I gone mad? No. It simply is a brilliant comedy.
On the pretence that "We're The Millers" was a complete failure, I was adamant to pass my own judgement on the film as soon as possible. Dragging my (only available) friend Sam along to this packed out screening, I really wasn't expecting anything special from this star studded comedy.
Instead, I laughed so regularly, my belly began to ache. The film continues to throw as many jokes as humanly possible into the mix, some being vulgar and others perfectly clean.
It's been a long time since a comedy has really surprised me and I had begun to lose faith in certain parts of Hollywood. Now my faith has (slightly) been restored, and I am beginning to trust the summer blockbusters, to a degree.
The acting from all the cast is a joy to watch. They all deal with comedy in such a way that includes perfect timing and style, which is perfect for their characters.
Verdict
"We're The Millers" is the fresh spin on the comedy genre that I have been waiting for. All summer long I have had to contend with disgraceful offerings like "Grown Ups 2" and "The Smurfs 2", but towards the end of the summer; I have been rewarded. It may not be outstanding, but it sure is satisfying.
7 stars out of 10.
Written by Scott Gentry.
This Is the End (2013)
It has it's highs and lows, but I am confident that "This Is The End" is one of this summers best comedies, if not for a long time.
"This Is The End" (15) Director: Evan Goldberg and Seth Rogen. Starring: Jay Baruchel, Seth Rogen, James Franco and Jonah Hill. Running time: 107 minutes. Rated: 15, for containing very strong language, strong sex references, drug use and gore.
When best friends Jay and Seth meet up over a weekend, they decide to visit their good friend James Franco, for a house party. On arrival, drugs, sex and all things crazy happen. When things (apparently) couldn't get worse, the apocalypse arrives and six friends including Jonah Hill and Danny McBride all fortify the house to escape the horrors that lie in wait on the outside. Then cabin fever sets in.
Comedy's of recent years have mainly been party or romantically based. A fresh take on the genre has been long overdue; the "Hangover" series has shed some light on that but nothing has broken down barriers quite like "This Is The End".
From the writers of "Superbad", "This Is The End" dares to kill off A- list stars, include religion and even show a rape scene by a demon. It really is a comedy that raises the bar. All the actors play themselves which is quite interesting and fresh. Most of the laughs from the film, relies on self-parody, for example the group of friends (real Hollywood actors) accuse each other of making bad films, for example Seth Rogen and "The Green Hornet".
After a while, some jokes just become reliant on sexual innuendos, which is a shame as the rest of the film works perfectly well as a dark and satirical film. The acting is good and the cast look as though they are having a great time, in the roles which they pretty much play in real life.
It has it's highs and lows, but I am confident that "This Is The End" is one of this summers best comedies, if not for a long time.
4 STARS
Written by Scott Gentry.
Pacific Rim (2013)
In conclusion, "Pacific Rim" is an enjoyable popcorn film, which has brains, wit and a fair few decent fight sequences.
"Pacific Rim" (12A) Director: Guillermo del Toro. Starring: Charlie Hunnam, Idris Elba, Charlie Day and Ron Perlman. Rated: 12A for containing, frequent moderate violence and one use of strong language. Running time: 131 minutes. Out now in UK cinemas.
Set in the near future, beneath the pacific ocean; a portal opens which lets large monsters (called Kaiju) invade the mainland and wreak havoc upon its citizens. Soon, war breaks out and when mankind seems to be on its knees, a turn in the war occurs and the "Jaeger" program is launched. Two pilots mind's combine to fight, within robotic machines that could be humanities last hope of survival.
Guillermo del Toro. The man responsible for some of Cinema's most abstract and challenging pieces. He began his career with short films and gradually worked his way up into larger productions, his first being "Cronos". Since 2004, Del Toro has left the abstract films and moved into more mainstream films like "Hellboy1+2" and "Blade 2"; but never forgetting his flair for the art in his sets.
He then moved back in 2006 to the fantasy genre, with "Pans Labyrinth". A film set during world war two, which follows the story of a young girl who instead of wanting to grow up, becomes fascinated with the existence of fairy tales. "Pans Labyrinth" was received well by the majority of critics. "Hellboy 2: The Golden Army" then followed and was met with praise on the film's special effects.
The idea for "Pacific Rim" has been in development since early two thousand and six and was passed from company to company, proving that "Pacific Rim" had to be of a certain standard. A popcorn movie. Del Toro was not pleased and the project was dropped from Universal Pictures; but was eventually taken up by Legendary pictures.
"Pacific Rim" is undoubtedly a largely enjoyable spectacle, that is clear. What isn't clear (unfortunately) is some of the scenes including the Kaiju. Most of the scenes take place in the night time and it is fairly hard to make out who is fighting who at many points. If a sequel is going to go ahead, then my only advice would be to show more action sequences during the day.
The acting is surprisingly good. Charlie Hunnam is a terrific actor, who has showed us his ability in the much loved series "Sons Of Anarchy" (in which he plays Jackson Teller). Here, he is put in a role suited to him in which he shines. Idris Elba takes a step back from his serious career and has chosen to perform a role that can be serious, but requires little effort from the star of BBC One's "Luther" but is still engaging to watch. Rinko Kikuchi, a star of many independent films, has finally had her chance to show her skill in acting and break away into a more mainstream film and acts well.
The special effects are a joy to watch. After the success of the "Transformer" trilogy, films on large scales had to be improved and "Pacific Rim" has achieved just that. Legacy effects were hired and had worked on projects similar to this before.
In conclusion, "Pacific Rim" is an enjoyable popcorn film, which has brains, wit and a fair few decent fight sequences. Improvement on the night sequences would be appreciated, but if "Pacific Rim" has a sequel similar to this; I think I'll be willing to watch it.
4 STARS.
Written by Scott Gentry.
The World's End (2013)
Enjoyable and witty, but nothing compared to it's predecessors.
"The World's End" (15) Director: Edgar Wright. Starring: Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Paddy Considine, Martin Freeman, and Eddie Marsan. Rated: 15 for containing very strong language and strong sex references. Running time: 109 minutes. Out now in UK cinemas.
Twenty years ago, five friends attempted the golden mile. A famous pub- crawl in which they would visit twelve pubs, starting with "The First Post" and ending with "The World's End"; with the incentive to become annihilated. The only flaw in their plan was, they never made it. Now, in the present day; Gary King (Simon Pegg) a suicidal alcoholic (who still believes he is a young teenager at heart), is attempting to bring the once close friends back together once again, to finish the golden- mile. The only thing that stands in their way is a race of robots, hell- bent on claiming the Earth for their own possession. Now it's up to five friends on a night out, to stay sharp and stay alive, otherwise they may face, a very bitter end.
It was Friday, the 19th of July and after six years of waiting, mine and (my friend) James's expectations were finally going to be fulfilled. Or so I thought.
"Shaun Of The Dead" and "Hot Fuzz" are two of the most celebrated comedies in British history. Any film following those, is going to have it's work cut out. That is one of my main problems with "The World's End". The film-makers seem to have tried exceedingly hard to produce a script, that is funnier than their last installments. I'm not going to lie,they don't seem to have succeeded.
"The World's End" is in many ways a disappointment. It has however, focused on the storytelling aspects and the relationships between the five friends. The film has it's moments and at times tells some laugh out loud jokes; but not as many as it's predecessor. Expectations were considerably high and perhaps, pressure is the reason why the film has failed on some aspects.
The acting is good to watch, with Nick Frost finally stepping out from his normal roles and into a serious character. Simon Pegg is an enjoyable character, but after a while he becomes a little played out. The rest of the cast is fantastic, with cameos from Pierce Brosnan and Micheal Smiley popping up all over the place.
"The World's End" is really a complete retro festival, the little references here and there to bands such as "The Soup Dragons", are delightful; a soundtrack to cherish in many ways. The chaotic bar fights are a nice recollection to the days of "Shaun Of The Dead", with scenes such as when Gary is trying not to spill and drink his pint, whilst fighting hordes of psychopathic Robots.
There are twists and turns throughout the film, but it just doesn't feel the same way as "Shaun Of The Dead" and "Hot Fuzz". Perhaps on repeat viewings, I may pick up parts that I didn't see before and could become pleasantly surprised. I'm not saying "The World's End" is an awful film in any way, as a final chapter to the famed trilogy, it delivers; but could be improved.
7 stars out of 10.
Written by Scott Gentry.
Monsters University (2013)
As a prequel, "Monsters University" is an almost perfect sequel that has lost a few of it's predecessors qualities, but not it's charm and wit.
"Monsters University" (U) Director: Dan Scanlon. Starring (voices only): Billy Crystal, John Goodman, Steve Buscemi, Helen Mirren, Charlie Day and Nathan Fillion. Rated: U, for containing mild slapstick and comic threat. Running time: 110 minutes. Out now, in UK cinemas.
Set many years before the events of "Monsters Inc", this film follows Mike's (Billy Crystal) tumultuous school life and his ascent into Monsters University; where monsters study to work in corporations that keep their world running through collecting the screams of young children. Once there, Mike encounters James Sullivan, (John Goodman) a large monster hot-shot who is an expert on scaring but not on exams. Soon, a rivalry grows, but if they want to succeed; they might just have to work together.
Disney Pixar are well known for creating some of the most loved children's films in animation history, with names like "Cars", the "Toy Story" trilogy and "Wall-E". Their sequels are generally quite good and don't fall short of their expectations. However, Pixar has never completed a prequel before now and the one problem with prequel's is, they rarely work.
Nevertheless, Pixar ignored the signs and has presented a piece of delightful amusement. From the offset, "Monsters University" produces the style we all acquainted with, from it's predecessor; whether it be the familiar opening titles, or the appearances of some of our favourite characters.
The characters are quirky and inventive; going from hippies to computer salesmen, who have returned to the university even in their old age. The voice talent is superb; Crystal and Goodman work together extremely well and produce some funny scenes.
The script is both inventive and funny, by daring to include characters not previously heard of in the original film. The jokes are highly enjoyable which will keep children and adults equally entertained. The animation is outstanding, as it should be from the Pixar crew, adding large set pieces and bundles of colour to the "Monsters" universe.
Verdict
As a prequel, "Monsters University" is an almost perfect sequel that has lost a few of it's predecessors qualities, but not it's charm and wit.
7 stars out of 10 = Excellent!
Written by Scott Gentry.
RED 2 (2013)
"RED 2" is large amounts of fun whether it be intelligent or not. An enjoyable sequel that doesn't try too hard; but ends up delivering a satisfying piece of film.
"RED 2" (12A) Director: Dean Parisot.
Starring: Bruce Willis, Helen Mirren, John Malkovich, Anthony Hopkins and Lee Byung-hun.
Rated: 12A, for containing moderate action violence and moderate language.
Running time: 116 minutes.
Out now in UK cinemas.
*RED stands for retired extremely dangerous.*
Following the events of "RED", Frank (Bruce Willis) and his girlfriend Sarah (Mary Louise-Parker) are now a happy couple who live together, uninterrupted by the life that Frank was so used to. However, he is soon forced to re-group with his old operatives, including Marvin Boggs (John Malkovich); and plunged once again, into the world of uncompromising assassins, vicious terrorists and relentless government officials. No- one ever said retirement would be easy!
"RED" was a surprise hit of 2010 (based upon a famed graphic novel); which boasted a fresh take on the action genre. It included a cast that may be elderly, but was more than capable to play characters of a demanding genre.
"RED 2" is much the same as its predecessor. It includes the original cast (excluding Morgan Freeman) and places them in chaotic and overblown action sequences, much like before. However, it is not a straight copy- cat film. "RED 2" mixes the unique blend of humour with plenty of action.
Saying that, "RED 2" seems to have a less intelligent script than before. It is written by the Hoeber brothers, who are well known for hit and miss scripts for films such as "Battleship" and "Whiteout".
It almost seems as though they have not tried very hard at all to produce an entertaining sequel, to a film that has grown in popularity.
"RED 2" is diverting, yet it lacks the narrative needed to carry the film through its close to two hour running time. Although, the film does not seem concerned by the quality of it's plot, but the characters and the jokes which accompany them.
The film's cast is well led, by the more than capable Bruce Willis, who uses his "Die Hard" charm to good use. John Malkovich is as zany as ever and Anthony Hopkins is more entertaining to watch than some of his recent roles.
Verdict
"RED 2" is large amounts of fun whether it be intelligent or not. An enjoyable sequel that doesn't try too hard; but ends up delivering a satisfying piece of film.
5 stars out of 10 = Good.
Written by Scott Gentry.
The Wolverine (2013)
Despite its flaws, "The Wolverine" has been delivered well, whilst trying to avoid the plot-holes of its predecessor. It has succeeded, to a degree.
"The Wolverine" (12A) Director: James Mangold. Starring: Hugh Jackman, Will Yun Lee, Tao Okamoto and Brian Tee. Rated: 12A, for containing moderate action violence and one use of strong language. Running time: 126 minutes. Out now in UK cinemas.
Many years after the events of "The Last Stand", we learn that the Wolverine has become a drifter. Moving from town to town, seeking justice where he can deliver it. One night, after a fight in a bar; the Wolverine meets Yukio (Rila Fukushima), a skilled samurai swordsman who asks Wolverine to journey with her to Tokyo, to meet the dying man that he saved during world war two. On arriving, Wolverine is given a chance to become mortal; declaring no, he is poisoned and is plunged into a life or death battle to become immortal once again.
Tuesday the 30th of July. It was finally my chance to watch "The Wolverine". From what I had heard (by other critics), "The Wolverine" was in some respects, a critical failure. So, due to these verdicts, I built the assumption that I was not going enjoy it and probably end up awarding it a low rating. That, however is not the case.
Instead, I was actually quite surprised at the efforts of "The Wolverine". Compared to it's predecessor ("X Men Origins: Wolverine"), it had improved greatly. Here, Wolverine is given a chance to develop his character, whereas last time large amounts of mutants were introduced to keep the story interesting; which didn't really work.
The film begins fairly slow, but as the story progresses, it begins to pick up the pace quite dramatically. When Wolverine arrives in Tokyo, it's not too long before he's busy stabbing and smashing his way through hordes of Chinese mafia.
The film continues to put it's audience through various set pieces that are quite inventive. For instance, the fight scene on top of the Japanese Bullet train, is funny and creative; swapping ludicrous action for a more realistic tone.
Here, I couldn't help but feel, the "The Wolverine" was similar to the popular Jason Statham film; "Crank". They have almost the same plot-line and both share the same tone. Despite it's similarities, "The Wolverine" is aimed at people of a younger audience, which pushes (in my opinion) the 12A rating.
As "The Wolverine" continues however, it begins to disappoint. The 3D effects are quite worthless for the film, as they are not used to their full potential. The CGI is also quite disappointing, for example the fight scene inside the large medical centre is very shaky.
It's the stars of the film that save it from failing. Hugh Jackman steps into a more personal role this time round, and acts perfectly well, cracking some good one-liners here and there. First time actors Tao Okamoto and Rila Fukushima, both act to quite a high standard considering it is their first feature length film.
Verdict
Despite its flaws, "The Wolverine" has been delivered well, whilst trying to avoid the plot-holes of its predecessor. It has succeeded, to a degree.
6 stars out of ten = Good.
Written by Scott Gentry.
World War Z (2013)
A sequel is being planned, but if it's any worse than this installment, count me out.
"World War Z" (15) Director: Marc Forster. Starring: Brad Pitt, Mathew Fox and James Badge Dale. Rated: 15 for containing sustained threat and strong violence. Running time: 116 minutes. Out now, in UK cinemas.
Former UN representative Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt) must travel the world in a race against to find the cure to the zombie apocalypse and return to his family all in one piece.
Originally a best selling book written by Max Brooks, "World War Z" is (supposed to be) a story told from different accounts of people during the great Zombie War. The film version is completely different, just featuring on one character and his struggle to find a cure.
"World War Z" (in my opinion) fails completely. To call itself a horror film would be a lie, in fact you could possibly call it a cuddly version of so many zombie films we have seen in the past. One of my concerns, is that it wasn't gory enough. It is almost like the film company weren't sure which age group they were aiming for, so they cut out all of the gore to play it safe. After all, what is a zombie film ,without a splash of gore?
The action is almost comical, with set pieces as large as I have ever seen before completely put to waste. The special effects were fairly decent, but become boring after so long. However when they have the invasion in Jerusalem, they work quite well, with zombie hordes climbing an insanely tall wall. The acting, is shallow; even for Brad Pitt's standards and leaves the viewer with the impression, that nobody really cares for this production.
Personally, I feel that the real reason for the failure of the film was the time, the production spent in development hell. There really is little to praise in the film, except that "World War Z" works well as an action film, but falters on the concept of the zombie apocalypse. A sequel is being planned, but if it's any worse than this instalment, count me out.
2 STARS
Written by Scott Gentry.
The Great Gatsby (2013)
In summation, "The Great Gatsby" is a good adaptation, boasting a great cast, lavish effects and the chance to bring an eighty-eight year old novel, into the modern age.
"The Great Gatsby" (12A) Director: Baz Luhrman. Starring: Leonardo Dicaprio, Tobey Maguire, Carey Mulligan and Jason Clarke. Rated: 12A, for containing moderate sex, violence and bloody images. Out now in UK cinemas.
After moving to Long Island (just outside of New York, America) Would-be writer and WW1 veteran Nick Caraway (Tobey Maguire), is thrust into the vibrant and alluring life of Jay Gatsby (Leonardo Dicaprio) his neighbour. Soon, Nick begins to question Jay and how he obtained his large fortune, with consequences no-one could have foretold...
Being a fan of the "The Great Gatsby" novel, I was very much looking forward to this adaptation. Many people remember the 1974 version, starring Robert Redford and Mia Farrow, which received mixed to positive reviews, but was a financial success. You see, there has never been a 'great' Gatsby adaptation, only mediocre ones. The latest adaptation (I hoped) would maybe become the definitive version.
"The Great Gatsby" (2013) is a well-rounded film, that likes to be daring and add in pieces that are suitable for the youth of today. For example, the film contains a fantastic soundtrack; including music from Shawn "Jay-Z" Carter and the likes of the rock band, U2. There are also plenty of light-hearted moments, action and lots of drinking and partying.
Baz Luhrman has not conformed to the traditionalist's view of the novel, and has instead put his own swing on it, which proves to be entertaining. The style of Luhrman is wonderful; the way he has set out the world of Gatsby is quite brilliant. It is colourful, vibrant and above all true to the book.
The cast was well thought out and I believe that "The Great Gatsby" gave Tobey Maguire his chance, to show the world that he wasn't just bound to the "Spiderman" franchise and can actually act. The moment, Leonardo Dicaprio signed on, I was hooked. Dicaprio has been making films for nearly twenty-four years, but has never won an Oscar. At the next Oscars, I hope that Dicaprio wins; as he is superb as Gatsby. The supporting cast is brilliant, Carey Mulligan (veteran of "Doctor Who") plays Daisy Buchanan, the love of Gatsby's life and is surprisingly good.
In summation, "The Great Gatsby" is a good adaptation, boasting a great cast, lavish effects and the chance to bring an eighty-eight year old novel, swinging and dancing into the modern age.
4 STARS
Written by Scott Gentry.