The Garfield Show (TV Series 2008–2016) Poster

(2008–2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
49 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Underrated cartoon
emftamatalk8 November 2014
I think this is a decent show. I liked watching Garfield & Friends when I was younger but I still like the modern show better; it seems more creative with less bland dialog. I think the voices of the characters are better now and their personalities are more lovable.

This Garfield show is quite cute and most of the episodes have really good plot ideas. You can recognize the personalities of Garfield, Jon, and the other characters from the comic strips, and they don't look too different from their original design. I like the fluid animation but I think the CGI could be done better; maybe with better textures or brighter color? What makes Garfield stand out from other modern cartoons is that it doesn't try too hard to be funny, so that you can focus on the engaging storyline without too many pointless jokes.

Overall, it's a great show for Garfield fans and I think it's especially good for children who like the comics.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
FUN,ADVENTURE & SILLY HUMOUR!!! GOOD GARFIELD FUN.
lukem-527603 May 2019
The Garfield show is a nice little fun show for anyone of any age who like Garfield the character!!!

This show opens up the world of Garfield the most of all the different t.v shows the orange cat has had. I grew up reading & watching Garfield & like millions of others i loved that lasagne loving cat & i used to watch the old school cartoon Garfield & Friends where he had episodes & then the farm/barnyard characters had episodes it was great fun.

The BRILLIANT extremely talented voice actor legend Frank Welker is now the voice of Garfield & you wouldn't know the difference as he's that good!!! The original voice was the legendary Lorenzo Music R.I.P.

Anyway this is a lovely fun colourful show full of the characters we love & full of silly fun & harmless humour. There's adventure round every corner & it's nice to really explore garf's world & Jon's house. Just good Garfield fun.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nice show, but inferior to "Garfield and Friends"
TheLittleSongbird28 January 2010
"Garfield and Friends" is something I highly recommend. As with most people, I grew up with it and still love it to this day. "The Garfield Show" is good, it is nice to watch and quite entertaining, but in terms of charm and fun it is inferior. It is not quite the Garfield I grew up with. That said, the CGI animation here is very good indeed, with colourful background art and sharp character features. The theme tune is nice as well, and the voice acting was decent. Frank Welker is a brilliant voice actor, and while no Lorenzo Music who owned the character of Garfield, he is good. Oadie is quite adorable, then again I have always loved Oadie. And Jon is appealing enough. There are shortcomings however. One is the writing, it wasn't terrible, but it wasn't the dry and witty dialogue that made "Garfield and Friends" so enjoyable. Garfield's asides especially weren't as laugh out loud funny here. Another is Garfield himself, as I've said Welker was fine as his voice, but Garfield isn't quite the same here. He does eat a lot, thank goodness they didn't miss out the fact he loves lasagne, sometimes mischievous and not always that nice to Oadie, but here he isn't lazy enough. Also some of the stories are a little unoriginal and predictable. In conclusion, it is nice, but is it the best Garfield show out there? No, Garfield fans may be disappointed, but those looking for some harmless fun will like it. 6/10 Bethany Cox
18 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
My childhood lies in ruins
timgneher3 June 2010
If you've been witnessing the slow but sure descent of Jim Davis's classic comic strip into repetitive, agoraphobic oblivion with the same sickening disgust as I have, well then get ready for his new TV show. I'm sure you can't wait.

You won't like this show just because you like Garfield, or used to like Garfield. Nostalgia can't win out this time. It doesn't stand a chance. There is no liking this show. It is not possible. It treats your love for its protagonist the same way Garfield treats talking scales, it stomps all over it and leaves it crushed and insulted.

I grew up with Garfield. I learned to read by reading Garfield comic books. I was addicted to reruns of Garfield and Friends, the first and only Garfield show that deserves to exist. I was all set to give this show a chance. Heck, I even found the movies tolerable. This show is not.

Try simply getting past how this show LOOKS. I go to an art school, I've seen Freshman animation projects that look as good. It's about on par with those xtranormal.com cartoons people make. Jittery animation that looks like it's taking place in Balloon Land. Jimmy Neutron's show looked better 8 years ago.

And if you do get past that somehow, then try picking out a single joke. I sat through three episodes, I saw about four moments in total that looked like you were even SUPPOSED to laugh. I'm not sure if the writers knew this was supposed to be a comedy. Slow paced and lethargic, wandering and pointless. Paying attention to it is a chore. Even the music is bad.

Garfield sounds like he has a speech impediment. Jon looks like an insomniac or a drunk. Liz looks like Jon in drag. She's now his girlfriend, which you already know if you've abused yourself by reading the daily comics too. Figure that one out. It's like watching a new Peanuts show that takes place in college.

In summery, it looks and plays like it cost a dime to make. The end product isn't worth that much. Hooray for another cheap cash-in via Jim Davis, I thank you, the world thanks you. You've successfully proved that Garfield means as much to you as political parties mean to Arlen Specter, he's nothing but your big fat hairy cash cow. I hope he continues making you lots and lots of money for a long time, just know that none of it will be mine.

Do yourself a favor. Forget Garfield. Forget this show. Go read the older books and maybe rent a few seasons of the REAL Garfield show. You can just pretend he died of a massive coronary sometime in 2003.
19 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
New show has NONE of the charm of "Garfield & Friends"
firefox3354 June 2010
I couldn't agree more with timgneher's review. I'll add my 2 cents as well.

My daughter was watching this show and I sat down to give it a chance myself. Although the animation was very amateurish (in the vein of "Sid The Science Kid"), I decided to give it a try. I knew off the bat that since Lorenzo Music's death, any Garfield show wouldn't be "as good" as the Garfield of the late 80s/early 90s, but I thought it might be able to hold its own. I was sadly mistaken.

Even though I was thirteen when "Garfield & Friends" debuted, the show was so well written that you couldn't help but love it. The best part about it was the tongue-in-cheek jokes and pop culture references only the adults would get.

For example: "Hello, this is Garfield your doorman." - a reference to Garfield voice actor Lorenzo Music's roll on the 70s TV show "Rhoda".

Jon makes Garfield a bet that he can't go a whole day without watching TV. The TV comes to life and tries to entice Garfield to watch it. When Garfield unplugs the set, the TV counters with "Garfield, what are you doing? We had such fun together. Gaaarrrrfiieeelld... Gaaarrrrfiieeelld... ggiiivvveee mmeee yyooouuurrr aannnsswwweeerrr dddoooo" - a reference to Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey.

The list goes on. To me it was always as if the writers were saying to weary parents, "Yeah, we know you're up early with your kids on your day off, we feel your pain." The new show has none of that. Not one bit. It's geared solely to young elementary school aged children who don't notice just how much substance it lacks. The only similarity to the Garfield of old is that this show also stars a fat lasagna loving cat named Garfield. Jon and Odie are equally one-dimensional. I'm so thankful that Bill Waterson never let Calvin or Hobbs go though this kind of indignity (although, showing such respect for his own work maybe proof that he could have gone on for decades more.) Even Berke Breathed and Gary Larson's commercial success was always tempered with respect to their creation. It's clear that Jim Davis sees Garfield as his own personal ATM. He has that right of course, but it doesn't make it any less pitiful.

Mediocrity? Thy name is "The Garfield Show."
13 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Garfield is back home
ITALUKE21 February 2022
I just realized why Garfield looked odd in the live action movies. Because he was animated, that's why! Here Garfield is able to do things that were limited in the live action, like some cartoonish stuff or alive lasagna from outer space. Garfield was able to be what he is, a cartoon.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is just bad
amsutherland-940288 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The animation quality looks like something a first year computer animation student would make. More than that the writing is awful. Garfield is irredeemably an ass. Not in a funny way, but in a "...really?" Sort of way.

One episode shows Odie running away to a house across the street because Garfield made him think he was going to be taken by the police for some reason. Odie then plays with the kid all day. The kid asks his mom if he can keep him. The mother says he deserves it because he did good on his science project... what? What kind of garbage writing is that? The house is literally across the street. Odie would be visible to them daily. The suspension of disbelief a person has to have to enjoy this show is so high that even kids point out how stupid this is.

In short, as someone who has read all of the comic strips and watched all the episodes of Garfield and friends, this ain't it.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My favorite anime
Sussy_Bubby13 October 2021
The Garfield show is by far the greatest anime ever made. I would much rather watch this anime than the factory produced garbage weebs talk about. BTW I speedrun watching every episode of the Garfield show everyday while eating chef boyardee at 3 am.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You either like it, or don't like it. Its your choice.
TheCartoonfaxuator16 March 2013
In this review I'm only talking about the facts. That should explain to you why it got a 6 instead of a 1 or a 2 compared to other reviewers.

The Garfield Show isn't a good cartoon, but shouldn't be watched as a last resort if their is nothing good on the TV. The first thing that should be said about the show is that it has very well done graphics. These are what Garfield characters should look like in 3D animation. The characters act like how they should, and have pretty good voices. Thank goodness. There is only one true problem with the show. A majority of their episode have poor stories. 35% of their plots are good. The rest are mediocre. There is this one episode where Garfield saved the Earth from alien Lasagnas. Yeah that's some story. One thing the Garfield show does perfectly, is breaking the forth wall. Even though it's way over used, It's good to know that it's never done badly. The Garfield Show is a cartoon that could have done better. In the end it stayed decent.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wow, this is bad.
has_no_pseudonym2 January 2011
If I could give this show zero stars I would.

As a reenvisioning of "Garfield and Friends" it's atrocious. As a new strip-to-cartoon it's poor. As a cartoon show in its own right it's pretty bad. Sort of the level of super cheap, "let's throw together some drivel, the little kids watching this won't know what they're missing" sort of feel to it.

Garfield doesn't resemble Garfield from either the original show or the strips. There's no sarcasm, no confidence, no wit, no humor. What few jokes there are fall flat. The only reason Odie sounds right is because they got the same actor to voice him. Jon, instead of being an awkward, moronic sort of man, is a flailing pushover and frankly, boring. Where's his anger and impatience with Garfield's antics? (Maybe I need to see more episodes to see that, but...I really don't want to watch more than I have.)

The animation is sub par and erratic. The writing is just...bad. If the original "Garfield and Friends" was on the same level it would have flopped and not lasted seven seasons.
11 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This is a masterpiece of a TV show
ionimpulse-9060212 March 2019
Every time I hear the soft jingle of this show, I instantly am drawn to the nearest screen. I NEED to consume more of this show. I literally have an addiction to it, and i'm watching as i type this review. Garfield is so goddamn great, i cannot describe it with words.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An exceptional show, with a lesson learnt at the end
karl_with-1225 July 2009
Garfield - we've seen him as a stuffed cat who eats lasagna all day. But have we actually seen him on his own TV Show? Along with his best friend, Odie the dog, Garfield finds himself in sticky situations, and going through "cat issues" and like a random kid show, learning a valuable lesson at the end of the day.

Even though I've only seen one episode of the show, I've started to develop a certain liking for it... I mean Garfield and Odie embarking on a exciting expedition, trying to steal a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, guarded by a Lephracon. Then Garfield soon learns that "wealth isn't everything" and decides to do the right thing. What could be more better?

A typical kid show I know, but I'll recommend it to any Garfield fan.

*******/**********

(7/10 stars)

~Kalendra
13 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not the Garfield we grew up with
celestial-flight10 January 2010
I believe the previous reviewer is a bit misinformed. She acts as though Garfield never had a show when he, in fact, did. It was a cartoon show in the late 80s to early 90s called "Garfield and Friends." That show was far superior this one.

While the animation of this particular show is nice to look at, I feel it lacks the charm of the earlier show. The deliveries are flat and in many ways Garfield is not acting himself. Furthermore, I find myself missing US Acres, which was in included in "Garfield and Friends." If you are a fan of the show, you might be disappointed, but you can give a try to see if it's your... cup of lasagna? (Sorry, that was bad.)
10 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uuggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
njnya5 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
(This is me and my friend's review).

This is the worst show since Out of Jimmy's Head. The animation... where do I start. I KNOW! I'll start with the trees....FLAT. It's animated in 3D, but most of back ground props are 2D. Plus there's pretty much no texture in anything. The grass is just a flat plane of green with a few 2D sprigs here and there. Well, at least the characters have shadows.... do they? I don't know.

Another thing is the camera angles. The camera moves around a lot, sometimes the camera will pointlessly rotate around the entire area. In one episode, when the camera stopped rotating, it stopped behind a tree and half of the screen was covered by the tree.

What about the humor?

70% of humor = Jokes about Garfield's eating habits.

10% of humor = "Fourth wall" jokes.

20% of humor = other

Ya, most of the jokes are about Garfield's eating habits with some fourth wall jokes here and there. It's only made me come close to laughing once, maybe twice. Another thing is how there's not very many jokes in the show.

The Plots: I NEED LASAGNA, I NEED PIZZA, BUY ME FOOD, I'M FAT, I NEED MORE FOOD, I NEED SOMEONE TO COMPLEMENT ME ON HOW SKINNY I AM( His owner: Loose weight Garfield)! Also he can be kind of a jerk to some of the other characters, For example: beating up Nermel, throwing Odie out of the house ext. Other than that, the plots are mostly average like some guy being mean to his animal and then getting arrested.

Color scheme: The colors are mostly off like one scene (as seen by my friend) John's shirt was light blue in one scene and then dark blue in the next.

My friend says the character design is ugly because they are all round, and they lack shading.

It's hard to believe this show has over 150 episodes.

Over all, this show lacks in most categories. It's basically just your average kid's show (and below average in animation). Me: turns on TV, TV: Next up, back to back primers of the Garfield show, and after that, Johnny Test, and after that, more Garfield show! Me: Uuggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bland and forgettable
Rectangular_businessman10 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
While I don't hate this series, I don't like it very much either.

"The Garfield Show" pales in comparison with the vastly superior "Garfield and Friends", lacking the brilliant satirical angle which made that cartoon one of the best animations from the late eighties.

While "Garfield and Friends" had a clever sense of humor which made it enjoyable for kids and adults alike, "The Garfield Show" is way more childish, with more simplistic jokes and stories.

Without being terrible,"The Garfield Show" is frankly unremarkable and easy to forget.

Well, at least is much better than the awful live action movies.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Ehh...
batmanlover-2455422 October 2016
I mean, it isn't the worst show ever, but it's pretty bad. I used to love this cartoon, but after a while, I realized it was a cheap cartoon to entertain 4 year old toddlers.. The jokes aren't that funny, Garfield acts WAY too savage, Nermal is evil, and it is literally NOTHING like the actual comics. You know, it could've actually been a good cartoon. But no, it had to be a bad CGI cartoon. If you have Netflix, you may see a second option called "Garfield and Friends". If you see that, watch that instead. It's WAY better. Oh, and don't bother doing "Garfield's Fun Fest" either. It's just a small movie for "The Garfield Show".

So, in my opinion, this show gets a 3/10. I can't even explain how bad it is, but please, don't watch it.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated show
mechakoopa13 April 2024
When I became a Garfield fan through Garfield lasagna party, I started watching this show. And it's a shame that it gets hate as the animation is very neat.

Out of all the Garfield shows I give Garfield and friends an 8/10 and that 2019 show a 6/10. It's a fine reboot of Garfield and friends for what it is. However, the show is way too long and they are too heavily focused on aliens and sci fi- 10 episodes in season 1 alone have aliens or sci fi elements.

Honestly, the so many characters can be nauseating to keep track of due to the huge cast of major and minor characters.

But overall, it's a fine show despite these flaws.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I can't believe they keep showing this godawful show on Cartoon Network!
iansimsjam1 October 2011
Remember Garfield and Friends? That was awesome 80s and 90s nostalgia! I expected this show to be like that, but what I got instead was an ugly looking disaster.

First of all, it was made in France. Why would Cartoon Network show a classic American comic adapted by French?! That's the equivalent of Americans allowing a godawful German film about American history to hit the States. That was the horribly animated The Magic Voyage. This show fairly isn't as bad as that Dom Deluise atrocity, but it's still godawful.

Another problem is the animation. it looks cheap. especially for 2008.

Another problem is the target audience. The unfunny Garfield live-action movies were strictly for kiddies, but this show lacks any charm for adults. I liked Garfield and Friends because it was charming for both kids and adults.

The only thing good, is Garfield's voice. Frank Welker still has the ability to live up with Guy Lorenzo and Bill Murray.

Bottomline: It sucks. I would have given it 1 stars if it weren't for Frank Welker's decent voice.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great show though Isn't a sequel to Garfield and friends.
bloo-848-86264619 November 2013
I've seen shows trying to copy or remake the old one, but 70% of the time it ends up a total failure and gets canceled after the first 3 episodes. This show however wasn't made for adults, you can obviously tell with all the cliché jokes and the same plot line.

There is one thing you have to thank this show for, keeping Garfield alive and strong. Kids aren't in to comic books, or comic "strips" as much as they were 2 decades ago, Since Garfield isn't really adapted to TV yet since the 1980s or so (sorry if I'm wrong I'm 15) The spirit of Garfield might of just died out if it wasn't for change and I think this is it, getting CHILDREN to like this show so who knows maybe one of them will carry on Garfield through another 20 years or so? we could only hope Garfield lives as long as it can even if we have to go through some change.

Oh and I never actually reviewed this show, I think its pretty funny at times I actually like the animation style its not to much I think the way Jon runs makes me laugh the most (not the way he was animated but the way he was meant to walk)I honestly think any kid would like this show, but I know really long Garfield fans would have a hard time to adjust.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Garfield died.
ThunderKing630 August 2021
This show is pure madness. They body slammed Garfield then wrapped him in a body bag, then acted like it was alive.

This show is trash, plus they use the hash animation.

I Dunno how they can do this to a legend. It's mind-boggling.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
About The Show
lilithwinchesterx13 November 2020
I love Garfield and this show is just amazing, I love him even more. There's good humor and I just wish there was more episodes.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring, clichè and random
joachim00514 October 2013
I've loved the Garfield specials and the TV show, Garfield and Friends. I am a huge fan of this lazy, orange cat and looked forward to this new 3D-animated show. It was a mistake I should've never done. The first episode I watched was about invading lasagnas. The episode airing on TV now is a recent episode about robots invading the earth. It's basically the same episode, just slightly altered! The next episode was about Odie falling in love with a hair-brush (A watered down version of Rocko's Modern Life, perhaps), not to mention those horrible "pot of gold" and "dog contest" episodes, which has already been in countless cartoon.

Garfield talks in this show by moving his lips, which means humans can understand him in this show. This makes it a lot easier for the writers to solve his problems in the most typical ways.

There's very few reasons to even like this show. It has everything you've watched on TV before, but sugar-coated by using a popular cartoon character. The writing is horrible, the voices are annoying and the animation is mediocre at best. You can clearly see why they chose 3D- animation (Psst! Low production costs!).
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Are we having fun yet?
GoodMachines15 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It is kind of hard to talk about modern Garfield-stuff. Not only because the property has slowly devolved into a shapeless nothing for Davis to mold into whatever he pleases (knowing full well he will make tons of money no matter what), but also because it serves as a painful reminder that we can never truly go back to what made Garfield such an enjoyable property because of it.

Case and point, while the comics are still somewhat fun and enjoyable (even if a lot of the jokes fall flat), there will most likely never be a show, movie or special that is on par with Garfield & Friends. Is it an unfair comparison? Probably, but rest assured that this show, The Garfield Show, doesn't suck because Garfield & Friends set the benchmark so unattainably high.

No, it sucks completely by its own merits; the fact that it is a much worse show than its vastly superior predecessor is just salt in the wound. In fact, one could make the argument that both of these shows act as a representation of the standards and quality of the property as a whole. In other words, if Garfield & Friends represents everything that was good about Garfield, The Garfield Show represents everything that is currently bad about Garfield.

It is one of those shows where the problems become evident right from second one of the intro sequence. Besides having a theme song that doesn't at all match the tone of the rest of the show, the animation manages the impossible task of being too fast and too slow at the same time. In other words, it moves so fast that it looks as though everything is having problem catching up. The one positive is that this animation speed is not an indication of what the show will be like, but the point still stands; the animation isn't very good.

Sure, the animation and character movement are decent at best, but the one thing the CGI proves is that these characters just weren't meant to be portrayed in 3D. A lot of the time the character models and facial expressions look stiff (for instance, Nermal often looks as if he has a constant smile on his face, even though he isn't smiling), and the fact that this was originally made in France means that the lip-synching is almost always off in the American dub.

The voice acting is fairly decent (even if Frank Welker is a poor man's Lorenzo Music), but the things these poor actors get to say range from unfunny to mind-numbing. While Garfield isn't all that deep in the comedy department, he could, at the very least, make you snicker. In The Garfield Show, I didn't laugh even once; even at the stuff that was properly set up and delivered. I would mostly blame the fact that the comedic timing is way off, but I would also like to make the argument that they just limit Garfield to the things he's best known for: eating, sleeping, being mean to those around him. Those are three very prominent traits in Garfield's character, but come on; Garfield & Friends gave him lots more to work with.

As for what the episodes themselves are about... hoo boy. Talk about generic. Besides the large number of 'alien' episodes (there's like nine), and besides the few retreads of episodes from Garfield & Friends (but a lot worse), there really aren't any standout or noteworthy episodes of this show. A lot of the episodes could very well appear in any other below average cartoon show. In other words, it doesn't even feel like the show is specifically about Garfield most of the time, which is odd, given how the title is 'The GARFIELD Show'.

I'm not gonna sit here and act like Garfield & Friends is a masterpiece, but a lot of what it set out to do worked incredibly well; it had an identity, it had charm, and it had a lot of things going on besides the bare minimum. The Garfield Show has none of that; it has something, but it isn't anything I would consider good. Plus, a Garfield-show without U.S. Acres feels out of place to me.

In other words, this show is just another Monday.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This is just weird
dimitroll11 May 2021
Ok, let's get some things straight. I didn't grow up with Garfield. I didn't get the comics or the older cartoon as an adult either. Even right now I'm not sure why this is a popular franchise.

So I had no expectations going into this. I was disappointed anyway. The show is simultaneously too weird and completely generic.

The episodes are all over the place. Aliens, pirates, ghosts, science fiction. Many episodes use silly gimmicks that barely make sense like having a story within a story or weird homages the kids wouldn't get. Some episodes try (and fail) at emotional sincerity. Garfield is more of a mascot than a character in this show, so many episodes are barely related to him. Breaking the 4th wall is not in itself funny.

The animation is pretty bad. The character designs are really unflattering in 3d.

If you're in dire need of a TV show with talking animals to calm your kids down I guess it gets the job done.

Garfield likes food. That's more or less it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst show I have ever watched!
nmoshuris1127 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I grew up reading the Garfield comic books. I used to watch Garfield and Friends on TV but I found this sh-- on Netflix and I decided to give it a shot. The animation is ugly as crap and looks like cheap plastic, especially for something that aired in 2008. Another thing, they copy other episodes that they did. There are 2 episodes where Jon wins the freakin lottery! And they actually "lose" it in both of the episodes. What else... Oh yeah! They even reuse the characters you see walking in the street! I usually see a guy in a green shirt with glasses and gray hair. You see him in a TV show playing his guitar. Then, you see him dating someone inside Vito's. Then, you see him in a game show and then you find him eating ice cream in a buffet not minding his own business which looks nothing like a f--king buffet. Oh yeah! The show is very cheap and probably costs $100 to make. The facial animation looks like sh--. Sometimes, you see the characters head go through a wall. The voice acting is poor.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed