"Sherlock" A Study in Pink (TV Episode 2010) Poster

(TV Series)

(2010)

User Reviews

Review this title
53 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
very impressive
blanche-225 October 2010
They say a true classic is something that, despite costumes and taking place in another time, remains timeless. And we see with Shakespeare and other great writers, their plays are often put into modern settings and still work. The same is true of classic characters.

"Sherlock" brings Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson into the 21st Century. This isn't, of course, the first time these two have worked and lived in modern times, as the Sherlock Holmes film series starring Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce was used as propaganda during World War II.

This time, though, Sherlock (Benedict Cumberbatch) is young, working in the lab where he met Watson (Martin Freeman), the army doctor. Here, Watson has just returned from Afghanistan and is trying to adapt to civilian life. In need of a roommate, but feeling that no one will want to live with him, a friend introduces him to someone else no one wants to live with - Sherlock. Sherlock's landlady, Mrs. Hudson (Uma Stubbs) has given Holmes a deal on an apartment at 221B Baker Street. Watson moves in, with some trepidation.

This first case, A Study in Pink, concerns a series of suicides from the same poison, committed by three unrelated people. Holmes thinks they were driven to it, but how? He is called in by Lestrade (Rupert Graves) when a woman is found dead and Lestrade becomes desperate. Watson goes along and soon finds himself caught up in Holmes' deduction.

Fast-moving, fascinating, and delightful, Holmes and Watson now have use of the Internet, GPS, and cell phones. Sherlock, in fact, is a great texter. He wears three nicotine patches because smoking in London has become impossible, and he meditates on a crime while wearing them. The other modern touch is that everyone thinks Holmes and Watson are gay lovers. Instead of stories, it's looking like Watson is going to be writing a blog. All of these modernisms are very effective and work well in the story.

Stage and TV actor, 34-year-old Benedict Cumberbatch is Holmes, thin, youthful, fast talking and attractive; and the slightly older Freeman is a serious and troubled Watson, not the buffoon of Nigel Bruce, but a person who perks up when he becomes involved in the excitement of Holmes' case. They make a good team.

Really can't wait for more of these - very enjoyable, suspenseful, and entertaining.
90 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This Brilliant, Tantalizing First Step Leaves Both US Features in its Dust
drqshadow-reviews6 February 2012
A sharp, witty modernization of the Holmes mythos, the first in this ongoing series of feature-length chapters almost perfectly strikes the difficult balance between respect for the source material and fresh, original elaborations. Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman are equally prickly, sardonic and brilliant as Holmes and Watson, respectively, both to the common folks they're tripping over at every turn and to each other while they hash out the boundaries of their burgeoning friendship. Smart, fresh editing techniques give the audience an abundance of visual hints to Sherlock's methods at a crime scene, and also give the transitions between each scene a sleek, artsy edge that helps to convince this is more than a made-for-TV movie. Though it does occasionally leave Holmes himself in the dark just a bit too long in hopes that viewers at home will figure things out first, that's a very minor gripe and one I'm not entirely sure is actually a negative in this era of the deus ex machina. A bold, rewarding first step that sets the ball into motion for any number of future developments.
33 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
As a viewer I want this series to go on forever
wondervet-804-37141930 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
When the titles played and modern London was pasted on my screen, I was instantly skeptical - as a general rule of thumb I find this sort of remake somewhat lacking.

I was pleasantly surprised and, with the recent film staring Robert Downey Jr to compare it to, somewhat flummoxed. Although the purist in me wants to prefer the film, I must admit that Moffat's adaption is much better thought out - from the very start the answer to the mystery was paraded in front of the viewer and everyone I have spoken to needed Sherlock to spell it out.

Another reason I find the film superior is the interaction between 'the freak' and Watson. The constant outbursts of 'thats amazing' and the awkwardness of each believing the other to be gay is endlessly amusing and keeps a constant, upbeat, pace to the rather dark story. 90 minutes fly by unnoticed. Martin Freeman and Benedict Cumberbatch breathe life into their roles and truly make Sherlock an amazing experience.

the only downside I can see is people being afraid of Black Cabs for a while. Moffat's done what Baz Lurmann tried to do for Shakespeare, only he's done it much better and its a much cleaner transition. As a viewer I want this series to go on forever.
31 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brilliant
flaming_nora1 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
When Watson does an on-line search of Sherlock, the audience is guided to suspend disbelief that this drama, although set in contemporary society, has one marked difference, that we are now in a world where Sherlock Holmes, the Conan Doyle character, does not exist. To show the web search is efficient and makes use of modern technology, being all the more convincing for it.

Sherlock's flat is wonderfully designed and has a convincing feel. The use of an on-screen map during the street-chase added tension and excitement. The pace is frantic with the exception, in this episode, of the slightly over-long conversation between Sherlock and the murderer.

Sherlock himself, is a wonder. He meets someone, and within minutes, feels the need to exclaim details of their recent life-history. This is wonderfully entertaining and thrilling. At the risk of over-exposing this talent of Sherlock's, we are shown his forensic deductions with on- screen text which fades as he looks at the next clue. This works perfectly and balances the exposure.

Freeman is perfectly cast as Dr Watson and excels in his method of seemingly under-acting but perfectly capturing his character's mood and actions, regardless.

I think I detected a sense of sexual tension at the end of the episode. Perhaps I projected this following the ambiguous references to the characters' sexuality, but, if it wasn't a figment of my imagination, then it was artfully, and subtly done.

This was a brilliant opening episode.
38 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Greatness
freecom-130 January 2011
Just watched it on Swedish Television (in Norway), this genial piece of modernized, classical institutionalized British fiction. It's fun and full of suspense. Freeman is perfect as Watson with his neurotic energy. Just as he is in the Office. Cumberbatch is good as the modern Holmes, much like Suchet in the role of Hercule Poirot the last 20 years. The first episode is exciting and fast pacing; reminds of the Dark Night (Batman). Sharp analysis and blending remarks of cosmic intelligence, replacing each continuously. The humor is dry and funny. Holmes'analysis of the initial dead people are clever and modern; you hold your breath while smiling.... Great photography too, dark and earthly colors... I love this episode and series, assuming that the rest is just as good. Holmes is living well in the present moment, his superior deductions are not possible for a conventional thinker, but still possible to relate to. Besides the unnecessary snide remarks about Watsons intelligence, he is as close to Buddhism as it is possible to get, west of Bhutan.
28 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well done, Very enjoyable
kevlarster-129 October 2010
Much like any 'modern' (set in present day, as opposed to a recent production set in period) remakes of Shakespeare or Sherlock Holmes, they're not quite the same. Not being and aficionado of either, I must say that after watching this on PBS last night, I found it very intriguing, well directed and acted, and a great pleasure to watch. This is a show that I would definitely add to my collection. I did enjoy it more than Guy Ritchie's Sherlock. Not knowing A.C.Doyle's version that well, I found it interesting to find out the relationship between Holmes' and the British Police/Gov't official. Also not knowing anything about Dr Watson's past, I found his character to be intriguing .
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very good, something for everyone.
clarasofie6 November 2015
The show is very good and well-made. Every detail is thought through, and it is very interesting to follow the mind of Sherlock through every moment of the series. Even if you don't like the plot or the acting, then the beautiful scenes of London by day, evening and night will create a atmosphere, you might never forget. In Sherlock you will find something for everyone - whether its the plot, the actors or just the classic story of a detective and his helper. Benedict Cumberbatch is a great choice of actor, and with Martin Freeman on the side they create a powerful match. The long, slim silhouette that is Sherlock next to the small and grey Dr. Watson is a vision you will always remember.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent episode that leaves you wanting more!
margheritaaroli5 November 2015
Absolutely fantastic episode in the series of Sherlock Holmes!

This series is a great remake of the original Holmes series and novels. The character Holmes is a complex, borderline insane man who loves solving crimes. With his new partner Dr. Watson, they participate in solving the murders happening around town in Central London. This leads to a lot of evidence, weird coincidences, and dangerous situations for both of the men.

I was rather skeptical before watching the episode but was left speechless in the end. The film was funny, exciting, and kept you on the edge of your chair at some points.

Benedict Cumberbatch, playing Sherlock Holmes, is a fantastic actor for this series and handles the character perfectly. His facial expressions are on point and his rude remarks concerning the CSI Anderson and Sergeant Donovan make the room fill with laughter. Holmes' mind is intriguing and his explanations of his discoveries leave you wanting more insight of his overactive mind.

I would definitely recommend this series to anyone who gets a kick out of crimes and solving them. It is a very enjoyable episode that makes you want to watch more. Suddenly, all your spare time will be spent on watching the nine episodes in the three seasons that right now have been aired.

Enjoy your life being taken away by Sherlock!
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dazzling
Sleepin_Dragon19 July 2018
It is no wonder that fans adore the early years of Sherlock, after re-watching the first episode I was once again drawn back into the magic that was created when Sherlock first debuted. I cannot throw enough plaudits at 'A Study in Pink,' it's intelligent, funny, dramatic, bursting with energy, and just generally fabulous in every possible way. The whole premise and setup are beyond genius, I love how the scene was set, with introductions and back story.

Jeremy Brett will always be Sherlock Holmes to me, but Cumberbatch is Sherlock, a new and updated version, his performance was simply iconic.

I found Series Four a bit of a disappointment on the whole, finding it somewhat self indulgent, none of that here, yes it's clever, but not smug.

Superb production values, amazing script, captivating performances, in particular from Phil Davies, what a stellar talent that man is.

Virtually perfect. 10/10
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A great start to the series
grantss26 June 2016
John Watson (played by Martin Freeman), an army doctor, is wounded in Afghanistan and invalided out of the Army. Back in London his search for a place to stay leads him to share a flat with Sherlock Holmes (Benedict Cumberbatch), a brilliant but eccentric private detective. He has hardly met Holmes when Holmes gets called in by Detective Inspector Lestrade to help on a case. People have been committing suicide in identical fashion - by a poisoned pill. The police are calling it "serial suicide" but it is clearly the work of a serial killer.

A great start to the series. Intriguing, engaging and sets the tone and background for the series. We are introduced to Holmes' methods and genius, see how Watson and Holmes met and see what Watson brings to the partnership.

Case itself is quite fascinating and a good test of Holmes' intellect.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Solid Start
ericksonsam6021 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Haunted by his time in Afghanistan, an army doctor named John Watson tries to adapt to living as a civilian. He decides to move into a flat in London and comes across a most remarkable roommate, a consulting detective named Sherlock Holmes. A quirky man with an astonishing ability draw facts by the observing the littlest of details. As a friendship between them begins to develop, a series of related multiple suicides by poisoning start to raise suspicions.

This first episode is inspired by the first Sherlock Holmes story that Arthur Conan Doyle wrote called "A Study in Scarlet." Like the original story, it does a wonderful job at introducing the two main characters. Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman have superb chemistry and make for an outstanding modern-day Holmes and Watson. This one also introduces the typical characters that are well known to the Holmes canon like Inspect Lestrade (Rupert Graves), Sherlock's brother Mycroft, and his motherly housekeeper Mrs. Hudson. Worth noting too is that it makes first reference to Moriarty.

Its story is intriguing with a satisfying denouement. I'm not going to play spoiler but lets just say the culprit is someone nobody would ever expect. There is also plenty humor particularly in moments where Holmes ridicules the police for their ignorance if not incompetence. My favorite quote is when he says " Anderson, don't talk loud. You lower the IQ of the entire street."

All in all it makes for a fine opening to the series
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Modern Holmes exhibition
Lejink23 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I'm actually coming to these BBC modernisations of Conan Dolyle's creation backwards having watched the second series first, but my appetite suitably whetted I was delighted to get the opportunity to go back to the beginning for this introductory episode and unsurprisingly I wasn't disappointed.

Even if Benedict Cumberbatch's title character does seem to have arrived out of nowhere, unlike the full back story we're given for Martin Freeman's Dr Watson (Army doctor, served in Afghanistan), this only adds to his necessary mystique. The writers skilfully weave in the traits of the literary original as it goes on, down to the great man's predilection for cocaine, culminating in the first mention of his nemesis Moriarty, with almost literally, the programme's last breath.

It is possible to recognise in Holmes the qualities which attracted writers Moffat and Gatiss after their successful reinvention of another British maverick icon, Dr Who, but here they don't get the freedom of expression that science-fiction writing conveys and in addition have chosen to defer to Conan Doyle by using his original characters for inspiration, including dotty housekeeper Mrs Hudson, scheming older brother Mycroft and long-suffering catch-up police inspector Lestrade. More than that, they have to deliver telling murder mysteries too and somehow update Holmes to the 21st Century with its modern technology of mobile phones, blogging, texting etc and I have to say they do it brilliantly.

In ninety minutes we get to meet all the main characters and get a devilishly clever "serial suicide" plot, not forgetting the nod in the title to the original, obviously riffing off his debut in "A Study In Scarlet". Holmes's quicksilver analytical thought-processes are cleverly conveyed demonstrating just how far ahead of the methods of everyday police practice he is.

The acting is excellent especially Cumberbatch in the crucial title role. He gets across the unique other-worldliness of Holmes' character right down to his apparent sex-lessness, giving rise to some wry humour about the Holmes-Watson relationship. He just looks and acts the part but in a more Basil Rathbone than Robert Downey Junior way. I took some time to get used to the familiar Martin Freeman as ordinary foot-soldier Watson, but I'm there now and the concentration on his character, as well as humanising proceedings only further highlights the offbeat strangeness of Holmes.

Throw in some sharp dialogue (Mycroft to Watson at their first meeting - "You don't seem scared of me", Watson "That's because you're not very frightening") and some pacy direction and you have the perfect recipe for probably the best Holmes and Watson I've yet seen.

The game is well and truly on!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
First episode
magferguson12 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It is and it isn't the Holmes of the book and this frustrated me a couple of times. First of all, the characters are depicted young. The 21th century Holmes looks like almost a teenager, in his early twenties. Watson is around 27-35, judging by appearance. Combined with the Holmes depicted, this brings series a bit closer to "The Big Bang Theory" than I'd care for, with Sherlock as a more worldly Sheldon.

The Sherlock of the episode is initially shown as utterly cold, rational and energetic. While this may be closer to the book, as I started watching the episode, I preferred the Sherlock of the Russian TV series of 1979-198x (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079902/): a mature, intelligent man, rather than the totally driven "sociopath" (as he calls himself) Cumberbatch. However, if we consider that this is a rework for 21th century, then the present-day Holmes would make more sense for a contemporary figure.

The episode is based, as one can judge by the name, on the "Study in Scarlet". I would agree with those reviewers who say that the plot of the original story is followed reasonably closely, but with some nice quirks for those who know the book. Those are lost on the ones, who don't, though, making the experience a little bland.

As I watched the episode, I did cover my head a couple of times when it seemed to me that the Holmes I was watching, was too cartoonish and flat or the filming just sub par. On remembering the episode AFTER watching it, though, the experience seems worthwhile and one that opened a new perspective on the great story, so I will definitely watch the next one, just to check out how Holmes is developing.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unaired pilot, the copycat...
Shmaden19 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Firstly, why in God's name they made the unaired plot again? The only difference was that this episode contained more scenes other than those from the 0 episode. I had to admit I liked some of them, because they brought explanations to the plot, but why couldn't they made only one episode with all the scenes that the episode should have, it would have made a greater impact.

The problem with the copied scenes from 0 episode wasn't that they were copied, was that they weren't played that brilliantly like in the first episode, and only the fact that were shown twice, made them horrible at times.

Last but not least, Sherlock realizes that the killer should be someone who could go unseen and take people without any suspicions, but then after chasing the taxi, and talking with the killer at his home, he realizes the same thing he realized before, so what's the point? Basically what Sherlock realized was doubled in the same episode because of bad script(and I'm not referring to bad original script but bat copied). I don't know what was the point of all the twist with this taxi, the double realizing of Sherlock and overall the copycat episode. Sorry but this was just boring and bad, and not good enough, my vote is 5/10.
11 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very good, what a modern re-telling should be
sqeaston927 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The essential ingredients for a good Sherlock Holmes story for me is a good plot and good acting, and I'm pleased to say this delivers. The writing and cast are excellent, which is particularly pleasing after the last Moffat/Gatiss collaboration was so bad, the Doctor Who story "Victory of the Daleks".

The re-invention of Doctor Watson as a war scarred ex-army Doctor adds a welcome new dimension to the character, and Holmes himself is eccentric in the extreme, and lacks the social skills to make friends easily despite his genius. To quote the character "genius needs an audience", and thus he can't help sharing insensitive (although astute) observations regarding those around him. Unsurprisingly, this alienates many of his acquaintances, but fascinates Watson.

This was a great start, and I'm hoping what follows will be of a similar quality.
32 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A study in Pink
katinkapr5 November 2015
We were pleasantly surprised to see how the well known story about the consulting detective Sherlock Holmes is remade into a new modernized version. Our impression of A study in Pink is overall brilliant, and gives you the exact same feeling and it, as the old version. It captures the city of London in the most beautiful way you could imagine. A 21st century type Sherlock Holmes has arrived to give us the experience of an extraordinary crime series, just like we have hoped and waited for.

The first case A Study in Pink takes us straight into the universe of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson's life, and is a perfect beginning to the exciting series.

The cast portrays the characters perfectly and the acting is really enjoyable to watch as well. it is outstanding filmmaking that tranfers the original story into a fresh young story, and we are sure that the younger audience will love it as well. The TV series explains Arthur Conan Doyle's plot in a different, yet elegant way
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprised by how good it is
snoozejonc31 August 2021
A contemporary adaptation of the Sherlock Holmes novel 'A Study In Scarlet'.

This is an excellent feature length television episode with a good use of the source material, solid production values and great performances.

The plot loosely follows the concept of the original story but provides enough original material to make it fresh and interesting. Particularly towards the end it gets very compelling, although it's not hugely suspenseful because you know Holmes' life would not really be in danger. You do, as much as Holmes, want to know how the antagonist can do what he claims to do.

What makes it work so well is the star power and charisma of the lead characters. These are two great actors playing two great characters and they constantly entertain thanks in part to the dialogue.

Visually it is excellent, with strong cinematography, editing and art design. I was not completely sold on the amount of title sequences used to help viewers keep up with Holmes' observations, particularly when he explains it a few minutes later, but this is a matter of taste.

Generally, the use of modern technology in place of the traditional devices with the same principle in the books is another strength of the production.

I have avoided this for over 10 years for being yet another Holmes adaptation, but have to admit it surpassed my expectation.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A great interpretation of a modern Sherlock Holmes
gabriel-baker-706395 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The episode is thrilling, entertaining and packed with a dark and sarcastic humor. To see a man like Sherlock Holmes with such a peculiar personality, and how he is not fitting in in a modern society makes the series very entertaining. You're easily getting hooked on the show, even though each episode contains a different case.

Sherlock's insensitivity is shown pretty much all through the episode. He comments on things that others wouldn't comment on, because they know it is impolite. His lack of social skills is what makes the series humorous.

It is very interesting to see how he is observing the crime scenes and finding clues that nobody else would see. His super-intelligence is very well portrayed, as we "see his thoughts" written on the screen.

The ending indicates that something bigger is going on besides each episodes case, when the mysterious character Moriarty is mentioned by "the cabbie".
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sherlock Holmes, a study in pink
vincentbuemail5 November 2015
A Study in pink truly has some excellent features to it. When you watch Sherlock, i specifically enjoy that he is so intellectually superior. His peculiar dark-side which is very difficult to understand is also very important, because it makes him so mysterious. As a viewer, it is nice to be kept in the dark, to a certain extent. This is something that is very true to the original book, which i enjoy a lot. Nowadays everything is redirected and changed, so the book and the movie will be two complete different stories. Fortunately this is not the case, with a study in pink. Off course there are some changes. It's more modern than in the book, and there are some minor changes to the personality of Sherlock. Luckily it doesn't destroy the Sherlock atmosphere. All in all, a brilliant remake. I would definitely recommend it, whether you have read the original book or not.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Study In Pink!!!WOW
dhruviekandhari28 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is a brilliant start for the New Series"Sherlock"Based on The modern day present London,England,written by brilliant literary geniuses Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss.The first episode is a brilliant start and Gives you a thrilling 90 minutes.It is really above expectations.The quality of writing is so amazing that instead of physically,it gives you a clue of what the series "Sherlock" is about,with some above expectations and brilliant performance Of Benedict Cumberbatch as Sherlock Holmes,The world"s only consulting detective and he himself invented the job and is really the heart of Sherlock,Martin Freeman is amazing as John H.Watson.The director has done a wonderful job in creating an amazing atmosphere that enhances your viewing experience.This episode follows a dark tone and at the same time is funny,clever,fine and thrilling.Must watch,9/10
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pleasant surprise
Bored_Dragon26 February 2017
Considering that seasons have three episodes each and that episodes last hour and a half, we can look on it as a movie serial. Last night I saw the first "episode" and I am pleasantly surprised. It is smart, witty and lots of fun. Slightly reminds me of Lucifer. I can not say I'm thrilled, but I surely look forward to the next episode. I don't regret starting it so late, because having three episodes a year is really sadistic.

8/10
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Quite great
bakchu17 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This first episode is quite great, as it transports the characters convincingly into our time, in a seemingly effortless way. It would have been easy (and common) to portray Dr. Watson and Inspector Lestrade as ridiculous buffoons; instead, they're intelligent, normal beings, just as Doyle wrote them - we can even sympathise with poor, overwrought Lestrade (and his colleagues). I appreciate that. It's also interesting that the episode, in a way, deconstructs the "Holmes myth". Yes, Holmes is shown as man of almost superhuman intelligence and powers of observation, but at the same time - he doesn't actually solve the case. In fact, he has only *almost* solved it when the murderer shows up to present himself to Holmes. That's unusual and I think I like it, too, as a refreshing approach (but I do hope that Holmes will appear in his "real" case-solving capacity in other episodes; this is the only one I've seen so far).
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Holmes & Watson For the 21st Century
Lebowskidoo13 August 2019
Why did I wait so long to finally start watching this series?

It's simply sublime, I have a new addiction!

Perfectly cast and written with so many layers.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Review of A Study in Pink
jonasmolbechkuskner5 November 2015
We are in present time with good old Sherlock Holmes. This modernized way of presenting the most brilliant detective of all time is brilliant in every way. We can easily relate to the series because of the modern type of crimes and characters. The dry humour of Sherlock fits very well to the present times comedians. The dark and gloomy colours are a great way to set a thrilling scene. Cumberbatch is fitting perfectly as an arrogant, brainy Sherlock Holmes in the modern world. He is tall, sneaky and has a glint in the eye like he knows something others have no idea about, which they often don't. After watching the first episode I just wanted to move on to the second instantly.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I hope the rest is better
Nadine267 January 2014
I normally don't write reviews, a lot of people get slammed for their 2 cents worth, But this time I was really disappointed. I've only now started watching Sherlock, everyone raved about it but his staring eyes bugged me. But I thought it shouldn't matter let's take a look. For someone who is so smart it took a long time for him to figure it out, I was calling out the answer to him as soon as he started summing up the possibilities, it was obvious after about 20min. this in Unaired Pilot (A Study in Pink). In S1-E1 which is the same story but told a little differently, there it was even easier to know who done it, plus Sherlock really blew it there by not listening or paying attention, which is completely out of character. Is that what everybody found so thrilling, It was irritating!
12 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed